Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
36 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Describe Ivan Pavlov's classic experiment.
|
**Pavlovian conditioning was first recognised physiologist Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936)
**Used surgical procedures to measure saliva flow; presentation of meat into dogs mouth elicited a salivation reflex. Experienced dogs salivated before food was presented. **Dogs predicted that onset of US through the CS |
|
What is the Unconditioned stimulus (US)?
|
A stimulus that elicits an unlearned response (no learning associated with it)
|
|
What is the Unconditioned response (UR) ?
|
The unlearned response to an US
|
|
What is conditioning?
|
The association or pairing of a US with a neutral stimulus (soon to be a CS)
|
|
What is the Conditioned stimulus (CS) ?
|
A stimulus to which an organism must learn to respond
|
|
What is the Conditioned response (CR)?
|
The response to a CS (which is learned)
|
|
What is the key difference between Pavlovian and Operant conditioning paradigms?
|
**Pavlovian conditioning is purely association;
**operant conditioning deals with rewards/punishers |
|
What are the three stages of Pavlovian conditioning?
|
1. Habituation
2. Acquisition 3. Extinction |
|
What is the Habituation phase of Pavlovian conditioning?
|
**Check that US elicits a CR (usually physiological measures such as skin conductance or startle)
**Something novel will elicit a response; habituation phase extinguishes orienting response. |
|
What is the Acquisition phase of Pavlovian conditioning?
|
**Where learning is acquired; CS is paired with the US
**The change is strength of a CR is what is called the learning curve; the strength of the CR increases with more acquisition trials (there is a ceiling effect) |
|
What is the Extinction phase of Pavlovian conditioning?
|
**Presentation of CS alone will elicit the CR response.
**In extinction repeated exposure of CS alone will weaken the strength of the association |
|
What happened in Watson and Rayner 1920 Little Albert experiment.
|
Little Albert onditioned to fear white rat; but resulted in generalised fear
|
|
What processes affect the acquisition learning curve?
|
**Intensity - the more intense, the more rapid learning
**Order – the CS coming before the US yields better learning **Timing (delay; trace; simultaneous; backward) |
|
What is the difference between Delay conditioning (short) and Delay conditioning (long) ?
[Timing affect the acquisition learning curve] |
**(short) – CS proceeds onset of US, but US onset still coincides with CS (most effective) (seconds)
**(long) – long delay between CS and US, generally weaker than short delay conditioning (minutes) – generally not effectively but there are exceptions (taste aversion) |
|
In Delay conditioning what is the most important factors?
|
Interstimulus interval (ISI) – the interval between the two stimuli that are being presented
also Intertrial interval (ITI) -- the longer the better |
|
What is the optimal Interstimulus interval (ISI)?
|
**Optimal ISI – depends on conditioning: eyelid reflex is ~200ms (very short); and in taste aversion is ~30mins, but can still be there after a 24hr delay
**Generally is 0.4sec to 1sec is optimal in humans |
|
What is Trace conditioning?
[Timing affect the acquisition learning curve] |
CS proceeds US and there is a trace interval between the two, Is still effective but weaker than delay conditioning; the length of the trace interval determines effectiveness of acquisition
|
|
What is Simultaneous conditioning?
[Timing affect the acquisition learning curve] |
CS and US start and end together, but is least effective covered so far (besides backward)
|
|
What is Backward conditioning?
[Timing affect the acquisition learning curve] |
CS is meant to predict US but sometimes can get excitatory response, but rare and is sometimes used as a control
|
|
What is Excitatory conditioning (CS+) ?
|
CS predicts the occurrence of the US: A-US, A-US, A-US (elicits CR)
|
|
What is Inhibitory conditioning (CS-) ?
|
**CS predicts the absence of the US: A-US, A-US, AB, A-US, AB (no CR)
**Where AB predicts the absence of US **Inhibitors are silent behaviours – needs tests to confirm inhibitor status |
|
What are the two Tests for Inhibitors (Rescorla)?
|
Inhibitors must pass BOTHthe retardation and summation tests
|
|
What is the Retardation Test?
|
**How long does it take to make the inhibitor and excitatory stimulus with a neutral stimulus
**Passes it there is slower learning of inhibitor to excitatory than neutral to excitatory in same process (I < N) |
|
What is the Summation Test?
|
**An inhibitor is presented with an excitatory; and compared to excitatory stimulus or excitatory stimulus, neutral pairing.
**The inhibitor passes if there is reduced learning of the I + E pair compared to both E and N + E separately. |
|
What are some possible explanations for Extinction?
|
**Forgetting – (passive decay over time) doesn’t explain faster learning during re-acquisition and that Pavlovian condition can be maintained over long periods of time
**Unlearning – actively learning that there is no association between CS and US ****CS becomes ambiguous – as seen by the phenomenon: spontaneous recovery, renewal and reinstatement. (most likely) |
|
What is Spontaneous recovery?
|
Reintroduce the CS after a ‘break’ in time; the CR reappears: CR is not completely removed, the CS becomes ambiguous (not sure if it predicts or not)
|
|
What is Renewal effect?
|
When extinction is context specific, then in a different context (such as the context acquisition took place) the presented CS can elicit CR
|
|
What is Reinstatement?
|
(Reminder effect) present US alone after extinction, then present CS and it yields CR
US alone can reinstate association of CS: CR |
|
What are the Hidden assumptions of classical conditioning?
|
Equipotentiality
Contiguity Contingency |
|
What is Equipotentiality ?
|
Any stimulus can be paired with any response (false)
|
|
What is Contiguity ?
|
The more two stimuli are paired, the stronger the individual will associate them (false)
**Control and blocking groups had same pairing and the same number of trials but different strengths of association |
|
What is Contingency ?
|
Conditioning changes trial to trial in a regular way (false)
**Pairing is not enough though |
|
What is CS preexposure (Latent Inhibition) ?
|
Preexposure to the same CS that your about to be conditioned with retards learning (preexposure effect), but not if you present something else pre-acquisition
|
|
What are some explanations for CS preexposure (Latent Inhibition) ?
|
**Not purely habituation, since it’s not context specific; but CS preexposure is context specific (can preexpose in one room and acquire conditioning in another – context specific)
**Not a Conditioned Inhibitor, since it does not pass the summation test (E + conditioned I < E + latent inhibitor, therefore isn’t a conditioned inhibitor) **But it does retard learning |
|
What is the Blocking effect?
|
CS+ that predicts CR; pairing CS+ with X wont stimulate learning
**(nothing is learned about X because there is already an association between CS+ and CR, thus Blocking of X occurs) |
|
What is Super conditioning ?
|
CS- that predicts the absence of CR; pairing of CS- with X stimulates rapid learning about the association between X and CR, since CS- predicts the absence of CR.
**(learning of X occurs, thus super conditioning) |