Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
45 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
Actus Reus (AR) Includes:
(1) Prohibited _____. (2) Prohibited _____. (3) ______ Circumstance. |
b. Actus reus – prohibited result
c. Actus reus – prohibited conduct d. Actus Reus – attendant circumstance |
|
|
AR prohibited result example?
|
Homicide
|
|
|
AR prohibited conduct example?
|
Possession
|
|
|
Three Requirments of AR?
|
(1) Act must be VOLUNTARY
(2) No act if not concious (3) All intentional acts are voluntary, but not all volntary acts are intentional. |
|
|
The three categories under Mens Rea (MR)?
|
(1) Intent/Knowing
(2) Reckless (3) “Criminal” Negligence |
|
|
Actus Reus (AR) Includes:
(1) Prohibited _____. (2) Prohibited _____. (3) ______ Circumstance. |
b. Actus reus – prohibited result
c. Actus reus – prohibited conduct d. Actus Reus – attendant circumstance |
|
|
AR prohibited result example?
|
Homicide
|
|
|
AR prohibited conduct example?
|
Possession
|
|
|
AR attendant circumstance examples? (3)
|
(1) Age of victim in Stat. Rape
(2) "At night" in burglary (3) "personal property of another" in larceny. |
|
|
"an exertion of the will manifested in the external world or a non-occurrence involving breach of a legal duty to act."?
|
Actus Reus
|
|
|
Actus Reus Rationale?
|
criminal law punishes acts, not thoughts.
|
|
|
Three problems with Actus Reus Rationale?
|
1. Problems of Proof – how do we prove thoughts?
2. Problem of Scope – Everyone would be criminal because we all have stray thoughts. 3. No real harm with thoughts alone |
|
|
AR Requirement: Behavior must be _____.
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Three justifications for "Behavior is voluntary' AR Requirement?
|
a. Cannot deter what is not voluntary
b. No need to isolate in a prison what is involuntary c. No need to rehabilitate in a prison what is involuntary (criminal law not appropriate forum) |
|
|
Four main examples of involuntary behavior (behavior actor can't control)?
|
a. Reflex
b. Somnambulism (sleep walking) c. Seizure d. Hypnosis (Other movement beyond control of actor.) |
|
|
Failure of act may result in criminal liability when there is a _________________.
|
Legal Duty to Act
(failure to act may be a criminal act) |
|
|
Five legal duties to act?
|
Duty to act based on conduct
Duty based on statute Duty based on status Duty based on assumption of care Duty based on creation of peril |
|
|
Rationale for legal duty to act?
|
Tough to decide among all the non-actors.
(Hard to draw line of “who are culpable ones” – who are blameworthy in actus reus area as opposed to everyone else in world.) Tough to prove why there was a failure Few omissions are criminal – public does not fear passive behavior. Tradition of individualism – doesn’t want to encourage others to interfere in our business – want law to limit failures to act that result in criminal liability. |
|
|
Newton holding?
|
All persons are capable of committing crimes except for those who have involuntarily been rendered unconscious
Unconsciousness exists where the subject physically acts in fact but is not conscious of acting |
|
|
Decina case?
|
D knew that he could have epileptic seizure, and did while driving, killing four people
Reckless homicide conviction upheld because the act was making the choice to drive, not actually killing the people |
|
|
Examples of different "Duty based on Status"?
|
Husband/wife
Master/apprentice Parent/child |
|
|
Duty based on assumption of care - two case examples?
|
Pope
Jones |
|
|
Jones case holding/significance?
|
D charged with involuntary manslaughter for failing to provide for a child whom she was watching over
Because relationship between child and D was unclear, no conviction |
|
|
Pope case holding/significance?
|
D fed, housed, and cared for child
D did not stop mother from beating child, nor did she report the incident to authorities Although court ruled in favor D, bad decision: D could have alleviated situation D probably assumed care of child given mother's condition |
|
|
An example of a legal duty created by statute?
|
Selective Service
|
|
|
Unconciousness is a complete defense to a crime (negates act element of crime) UNLESS...?
|
Unconciousness is a complete defense to a crime (negates the act element of a crime) UNLESS the unconciousness is SELF-INDUCED.
|
|
|
"SELF INDUCED unconciousness is no defense to a crime and D's actions while under self-induced unconciousness will satify the act requirement for crim. liability"
ANOTHER EXCEPTION TO GENERAL RULE? |
KNOWLEDGE OF PENDING CIRCUMSTANCES:
(i) A person can incure crim liab. by engaging in a course of conduct knowing he will or MIGHT become unconcious and do harm. - Decina Case |
|
|
Unconciousness is a defense to ______ but not ____.
|
Unconciousness is a defense to ACTUS REUS, but not MENS REA.
|
|
|
Unconciousness need not mean...?
|
Unconciousness need not mean a coma/total inertness.
|
|
|
Example EXCEPTION to general rule of unconciousness?
|
D starts a fight with A.
D struck in head and rendered unconcious. While unconcious - D kills A. D CAN be found guilty because he STARTED fight with A --- thus CAUSING his own unconciousness. |
|
|
In the special case of possesion, MOST COURTS and MPC view?
|
Most courts and MPC
Possession is only an act if the person is aware she has the thing she is charged with possessing, even where the statute prohibiting possession is silent |
|
|
In the special case of possession, SOME courts view?
|
Some courts
Where the penalty is not severe, it is sufficient that D SHOULD have known she possesses the thing |
|
|
In the special case of possession, FEW courts view?
|
Few courts
Drug possession statutes are interpreted as dispensing with any need to show that D knew or should have known of the presence of the drugs |
|
|
Three requirements for AR?
|
(1) Voluntary
(2) No act if not concious (3) All intentional acts are voluntary, but not all voluntary acts are intentional. |
|
|
Requirements for Act of Omission? (2)
|
(1) D must have legal duty to act
(2) Must be possible for D to Act. |
|
|
Distinguish _______ from "duty based on creation of peril"?
|
Distinguish ACCIDENTAL creation of peril.
|
|
|
Most authorities view ______ result for an ACCIDENTAL creation of peril?
|
MOST say --- Same Result!
(although less clear) So, even though who accidentally create the danger, have a duty to act to prevent the harm. EX: Cali Case ACCIDENTALLY set house on fire but INTENTIONALLY let it burn for insurance $ The ACT was letting it burn! ALSO - Status duty to put out fire because he was the owner of property! |
|
|
What time must MR occur?
|
MR must occur at SAME TIME as AR.
|
|
|
Crim law generally punishes omission to act/inaction only when there's a ____ duty to act and not a ____ duty to act.
|
Crim law generally punishes omission to act/inaction only when there's a LEGAL duty to act and not a MORAL duty to act.
Rationale? |
(1) Moral duty standard too broad. People have different morals, so what should standard be?
(2) Where would we draw the line? [ex. Pestinikas case - what if mailman came by and heard screams?] (3) Legal duties are more objective and easier to follow. |
|
Generally, D must have knowledge of the facts that...?
|
Generally, D must have knowledge of the facts that CREATE THE LEGAL DUTY.
|
|
|
Generally, D must have _____ to perform?
|
Generally, D must have ABILITY/CAPABILITY to perform.
|
|
|
Generally, D not required to have knowledge that the law.....?
|
Generally, D not required to have knowledge that the law IMPOSES A DUTY TO ACT. (ignorance of law is no defense)
|
|
|
Possesion requires voluntary exertion of _____ and _____ of baggie.
|
Possession requires voluntary exertion of POSSESSION and CONTROL of bagie.
|
|
|
The affairs tht must have existed when the act in question occurs.
|
Attendant Circumstances
|
|
|
Many crimes require Attendant Circumstances.
Whether or not D must be aware of Attendant Circumstance inolves _____ Analaysis. |
MR Analysis
|
|