Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
29 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What are the 4 major approaches to molecular phylogenetics?
|
Maximum parsimony, distance methods, maximum likelihood, Bayesian posterior probability methods
|
|
Cladistics
|
phylogenies based on analysis of evolutionary patterns of particular characters, only shared derived states count
|
|
PAUP
|
program used in maximum parsimony
|
|
Problems with maximum parsimony/PAUP
|
DNA seqs have only 4 characters states and can flip back and forth, homoplasy, long branches attract artifact
|
|
Maximum parsimony
|
minimizes total number of evolutionary steps required to explain a given set of data for smaller tree
|
|
long branches attract artifact
|
more rapidly divergent the sequences, the more (by chance) they are to come together and look alike
|
|
homoplasy
|
accidentally shared/comvergent//analogous characters tthat don't reflect true evo relationships
|
|
Distance methods
|
Makes overall estimate of similarity/differences of all sequences in dataset, uses these as criterior for building tree by neighbor-joining
|
|
neighbor-joining method
|
two closest sequences joined together, then more distantly related ones added, etc
|
|
advantages of distance methods
|
good speed for large datasets, distances can be corrected to account for multi changes in distant past so better for highly divergent proteins
|
|
drawbacks of distance methods
|
ignores individual characters, throws away much detail of data
|
|
Maximum likelihhood
|
Model of how sequences are evolving used as standard to compare various possible trees to see if they best reflect the pattern
|
|
Idea behind maximum likelihood
|
DNA/protein seqs evolve in somewhat unique way in every dataset, derive model from actual data, use model as standard to compare to
|
|
Use of own dataset vs standard model
|
Large/robust dataset = can use, usually use standard model though
|
|
PAM
|
point acccepted mutation: aa exchange frequency matrix for ML trees of protein seqs
|
|
BLOSUM62 matrix shows what?
|
aa's most likely to remain same or change to chemically similar ones, higher the number = higher frequency of conversions
|
|
Advantages of Bayesian posterior probability methods
|
Sometimes provide support for branches/clusters/clades that other methods don't find/support
|
|
Disadvantages of Bayesian posterior probability methods
|
How reliable are the relationships? Takes long time to compute so hard to apply to large datasets
|
|
Types of data for molecular phylogenetics
|
allozymes, chromosome banding patterns, immunological, complete genome DNA/DNA hybridizations, DNA/protein sequences, using gene order as characters
|
|
Determining Species level molecular phylogenetics
|
use non-coding nucleotides (quickly evolving), design PCR primers to conserved flanking regions and amplify/sequence inbetween variable regions
|
|
Determining genus level molecular phylogenetics
|
Use rapidly evolving genes (ADH), 3rd codon positions in otherwises conserved genes, mito sequences
|
|
What have the mitochondrial sequences of pocket gophers and chewing lice suggested?
|
They co-speciated
|
|
Determining family level molecular phylogenetics
|
more conserved genes like rRNA genes
|
|
Determining order level mollecular phylogenetics
|
18S/28S rRNA plus morphology
|
|
Problem with Wheeler's results
|
Hymenoptera actually basal within Holometabola, Strepsitera more closely related to Coleoptera than Diptera
|
|
Determining class level phylogenetics
|
rRNA, multiple protein-coding genes
|
|
Alternative approach to original class level phylogenetics approach
|
phylogenomics: generate large EST sets from each species, extract overlapping set for each from them
|
|
Phylum level molecular phylogenetics
|
rRNA was original, now rRNA and EST analyses
|
|
Findings of phylum level molecular phylogenetics
|
Nematodes = closest relatives of arthropods, protostomes broken up into Lophotrochozoans and Ecdysozoans
|