• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/29

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

29 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What are the 4 major approaches to molecular phylogenetics?
Maximum parsimony, distance methods, maximum likelihood, Bayesian posterior probability methods
Cladistics
phylogenies based on analysis of evolutionary patterns of particular characters, only shared derived states count
PAUP
program used in maximum parsimony
Problems with maximum parsimony/PAUP
DNA seqs have only 4 characters states and can flip back and forth, homoplasy, long branches attract artifact
Maximum parsimony
minimizes total number of evolutionary steps required to explain a given set of data for smaller tree
long branches attract artifact
more rapidly divergent the sequences, the more (by chance) they are to come together and look alike
homoplasy
accidentally shared/comvergent//analogous characters tthat don't reflect true evo relationships
Distance methods
Makes overall estimate of similarity/differences of all sequences in dataset, uses these as criterior for building tree by neighbor-joining
neighbor-joining method
two closest sequences joined together, then more distantly related ones added, etc
advantages of distance methods
good speed for large datasets, distances can be corrected to account for multi changes in distant past so better for highly divergent proteins
drawbacks of distance methods
ignores individual characters, throws away much detail of data
Maximum likelihhood
Model of how sequences are evolving used as standard to compare various possible trees to see if they best reflect the pattern
Idea behind maximum likelihood
DNA/protein seqs evolve in somewhat unique way in every dataset, derive model from actual data, use model as standard to compare to
Use of own dataset vs standard model
Large/robust dataset = can use, usually use standard model though
PAM
point acccepted mutation: aa exchange frequency matrix for ML trees of protein seqs
BLOSUM62 matrix shows what?
aa's most likely to remain same or change to chemically similar ones, higher the number = higher frequency of conversions
Advantages of Bayesian posterior probability methods
Sometimes provide support for branches/clusters/clades that other methods don't find/support
Disadvantages of Bayesian posterior probability methods
How reliable are the relationships? Takes long time to compute so hard to apply to large datasets
Types of data for molecular phylogenetics
allozymes, chromosome banding patterns, immunological, complete genome DNA/DNA hybridizations, DNA/protein sequences, using gene order as characters
Determining Species level molecular phylogenetics
use non-coding nucleotides (quickly evolving), design PCR primers to conserved flanking regions and amplify/sequence inbetween variable regions
Determining genus level molecular phylogenetics
Use rapidly evolving genes (ADH), 3rd codon positions in otherwises conserved genes, mito sequences
What have the mitochondrial sequences of pocket gophers and chewing lice suggested?
They co-speciated
Determining family level molecular phylogenetics
more conserved genes like rRNA genes
Determining order level mollecular phylogenetics
18S/28S rRNA plus morphology
Problem with Wheeler's results
Hymenoptera actually basal within Holometabola, Strepsitera more closely related to Coleoptera than Diptera
Determining class level phylogenetics
rRNA, multiple protein-coding genes
Alternative approach to original class level phylogenetics approach
phylogenomics: generate large EST sets from each species, extract overlapping set for each from them
Phylum level molecular phylogenetics
rRNA was original, now rRNA and EST analyses
Findings of phylum level molecular phylogenetics
Nematodes = closest relatives of arthropods, protostomes broken up into Lophotrochozoans and Ecdysozoans