Why Abortion Is A Bad Thing Or Not?

Improved Essays
Abortion Term Paper In every topic there is always two different sides which are the pros and the cons, one group is for it and one group is not. Abortion is a heavy topic that many people have an opinion about. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most likely in the first twenty one weeks, which some people do not abide by and sometimes is after the said time. Is abortion a bad thing or not? I feel that there is no right or wrong way to feel about it because everyone is different and has been through different things and situations to make them feel the way that they do pertaining to abortion. With that being said, in chapter ten; Abortion, there are two opposing detailed articles where two authors explain their point …show more content…
Marquis also feels that everyone’s life has the same great value, so who are we to rob someone of theirs? He feels that killing a fetus deprives them of what they would value, or could value if given the chance. He also feels that above all it is seriously wrong to kill infants or kids. Which explains his views on the topic abortion. What marquis wants the world to understand is it is not about one person, it is about people realizing that everyone deserves to have a chance at a valuable future, like you and I. He also thinks that the right to life overpowers the right to ones’ body. Meaning that the mother should not have a said right in abortion. His beliefs that if a fetus is classified as a human, it has a right to live, period. In contrast Marquis cites Thomson, by saying that all fetuses have the right to live, which is the said argument that Thomson felt was a basic argument to use being pro-choice. He does come to the conclusion also agreeing with Thomson that if a woman is raped than the abortion is permissible. Marquis believes: “All humans, whatever their race, gender, religion or age, have the right to life” (Marquis). This quote means that he is not biased in any way and a fetus is a baby, infant it has a said “age”. His purpose for exceptions are to get rid of the instances where abortions will be immorally okay. He also acknowledges that people that are pro-abortion, don’t acknowledge fetuses as having the means for communication, fetuses just being things and not people. And by looking at them as things, it makes it easier to be pro-abortion, because they aren’t considered people to you. He makes it very known that he feels that the pro-choice views are in a way flawed because how can one prove that a fetus is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomson’s and Marquis’ Views on Abortion The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cleary killing one of these individuals would be wrong so killing a fetus would also be wrong. In laying out his argument Marquis claims that abortion is always wrong except in…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson presents the anti-abortionist argument in the beginning of her paper. In order to get a better understanding of the argument I have taken the time to put it in numbered premise conclusion form: Every person has a right to life. The fetus is a person.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A more obvious answer is better. What primary makes killing wrong is neither its effect on the murderer nor its effect on the victim’s friends and relatives, but its effect on the victim… The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future”(Marquis, 469). What Marquis is saying supports my argument because looking at abortion from a virtue ethics perspective, that child will not longer have a future. Once the abortion is done there is nothing to look forward to, no child, no one to look after or wait for.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren mainly emphasizes that “the rights of an actual person always outweighs those of a potential person” (Munson & Ian, 2016, p. 493). Just like the “anti” abortion views, Warren finds it always permissible to receive an abortion when due to rape. The woman carrying the child is an actual person who participates in the community around her, while the fetus has the potential to be a person just as the woman. But the fetus has yet to become this actual person. Warren would argue against Marquis view, that the value of the future for the woman carry the fetus is more important than the future of the fetus.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cynara Collins Phil 230 02/04/2018 Abortion is a serious issue that has been going on for years, many people don’t fully understand abortion, and why people choose to do it. Abortion is the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus. This usually is performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. There are different views on abortion, some agree and some don’t. abortions take place every single day, and yet public opinion remains at a standstill as to whether abortion is ethical or not.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis publishes his argument “Why Abortion Is Immoral” operating under the assumption that the moral status of the fetus stands or falls on the question of whether or not it is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to take. He notes that he does not argue for cases that involved special situation pregnancies like implantation or those that threaten the life of the women, but only ‘most’ cases. His argument is a significant change from many other anti-abortion arguments because Marquis attempts to distance himself from the assumption that a fetus is a person. Instead, he uses what he titles the “future-like-ours” argument.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Is Wrong

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abortion is wrong. Abortion is the murder of innocent children. Life commences at conception, and just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there. Unborn babies are human just like you and me and deserve the right to live. They are not less than us, so why shouldn't they get a chance?…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics