Is Abortion Morally Permissible Essay

Great Essays
Abortion is the act of purposely killing a human fetus. This action is legal in the United States of America due to the differing opinions regarding it. In this essay, I will discuss whether, or not abortion is morally permissible. If Abortion is in fact morally permissible, is it permissible in all or just some situations? I will argue that abortion is only morally correct in cases of a fetus having a severe genetic disorder and when the mother’s life is in danger. I will defend my argument by explaining how a fetus is a human being and that abortion deprives the fetus from having its meaningful future. Lastly, I will respond to the objections of a fetus not being a human being, speciesism, and specific cases of genetic defects in a fetus.
The first and main thing I must address is the phrase “human being.” We can all agree, that a fetus is a human being in the biological sense. When looking at human life from a moral point of view, can a fetus be considered a
…show more content…
Some may argue that fetuses are unaware of their future. Yes, fetuses may not know their future, but neither do we. Even if we do or do not care about our future now, it will still happen regardless of what we may want. Whether moments are great or saddening, something will be learned from each unknown future occurrence in our lives. A famous philosopher, Don Marquis, who is against abortion, also agrees with me on the topic of abortion depriving the future of the fetus. In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    I have to admit that Marquis’s argument is strong and clever. He avoids the traditional “personhood/sanctity of life” debates and the unusual circumstances that can easily form a forum. In order to establish there is not sufficient condition of the wrongness of killing some being, I mainly focus on arguing against Marquis’ crucial moral category “having a valuable future like ours” in his argument. In addition, I clam that the fetus does not justify as a human being nor have a desire to go on living. Therefore, it will not consider as killing nor moral impermissibility of…

    • 1515 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Marquis essay he argues that abortion is not right because killing the fetus is like killing an adult. Throughout the essay he questions that if it is right to kill a fetus it is right to kill living human. He then gives us the example of why it is wrong to kill a human. Marquis says that if you kill a human who has been alive that you are taking away their future and something valuable from them. You are ruining future possibilities of that person and he then ties that with the reason of why it is wrong to kill a fetus.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pro-choice advocates would argue that the right to life is only for “persons”. Philosopher and author Peter Kreeft is quoted as saying "Persons have a 'right to life ' but non-persons (e.g., cells, tissues, organs, and animals) do not.... If the fetus is not a person, abortion is not the deliberate killing of an innocent person; if it is, it is." (C. Watkins (Ed.), At Issue. The Ethics of Abortion, 2005).…

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Then, I will recapitulate the basic foundations of utilitarianism and finally, delve into my assessment. 1. Summary Marquis precedes his argument concerning the philosophical immorality of abortion by summarizing the arguments of both those who favor strict restrictions on abortion and…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dan Marquis proposes that it is wrong to kill a fetus for the same reason that it is wrong to kill a person: killing them would deprive them of their future of value. I want to argue, however, that this reasoning cannot be used to conclude that all abortions are impermissible. In particular, I argue that Marquis does not give us good reason to think that abortions that occur within the first 25 weeks of pregnancy are impermissible. The paper will include two main arguments. Firstly, I will argue that, even if Marquis’s proposal for why it is wrong to kill a person is correct, abortions during very early stages of pregnancy are morally permissible because, in these stages, there is nothing that has a future of value.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harman And Embryo

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are two possible considerations that are argued. The first being that at the stage of conception, human embryos and fetuses have equal rights to human beings. In Elizabeth Harman’s article, Judith Jarvis Thompson argues that “a fetus has a full moral status of a person [and] abortion is nevertheless permissible” (Harman). The second argument is that human embryos have some legal rights in comparison to humans. Elizabeth Harman argues the permissibility of an early embryo’s moral status.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three main viewpoints on this topic. The first viewpoint is that embryos have full moral status. Supporters of the viewpoint argue that, “Development from a fertilized egg into to baby is a continuous process and any attempt to pinpoint when personhood begins is arbitrary.” (EuroStemCell para. 5) The opposite side argues that the embryo has not yet attached the wall of the uterus and lacks all the properties we associate with humans.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A more obvious answer is better. What primary makes killing wrong is neither its effect on the murderer nor its effect on the victim’s friends and relatives, but its effect on the victim… The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future”(Marquis, 469). What Marquis is saying supports my argument because looking at abortion from a virtue ethics perspective, that child will not longer have a future. Once the abortion is done there is nothing to look forward to, no child, no one to look after or wait for.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I argue that abortion is prima facie morally wrong. Prima facie morally wrong means that the action at first is wrong, however sometimes there are ways to override its wrongness. My primary goal is to demonstrate that abortion, or killing a fetus, is prima facie morally wrong for the same reason that killing an innocent adult human being is morally wrong. I will also explore an objection to my claim and discuss my rational for why it fails to refute my argument. I believe it is prima facie morally wrong to kill an adult human being primarily because it denies them of a “future like ours” (Marquis, 1989).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is Abortion Ethical? Since the 1900’s abortion has been one of the topics on the hot seat of debate in our nation. Abortion has been a reoccurring debate where Americans ponder whether or not aborting a fetus is an appropriate moral action. On one hand some people feel that abortion should be legal because a woman has the right to choose what she wants to do with her body.…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, abortion eliminates any “potential societal contributions of the future human being” (“Should Abortion be Legal”, 2016). Think about our world today without a particular individual. To put this into perspective, imagine our society without the contributions of Celine Dion, Cher, Justin Bieber, and Steve Jobs, whose mothers actually considered having an abortion for various reasons (“Should Abortion be Legal,”…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Thomas Hilgers is founder of the Pope Paul VI Institute for the study of reproduction and firmly supports unborn human life. He has witnessed to this life through videos that walk viewers through the development of babies still in the womb. He is a believer in “human beings with potential,” not “potential human beings,” and there is a difference. “Potential human beings” states that the fetuses have potential to be human beings, assuming they are not yet human. In contrast, “human beings with potential” means that the babies are human even though they are not yet born into the world.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A human life begins start at the time of the conception. A children does not deserve to be kill for the irresponsibility of their parent. According to Life Site News, "Abortion is a defining human-rights issue of our time.." (Ricker 1). Everyone stands up for their own human rights, but when it comes to abortion no one stands up for the baby’s human rights.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays