What Is Probable Cause

Improved Essays
Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion According to Cook (1970) probable cause commonly deals with a necessary condition in criminal law that police have sufficient causes to capture somebody, lead an inquiry, or seize property related with a crime. Reasonable suspicion is a standard utilized as a part of criminal methodology. It is not as firm than probable cause. Reasonable doubt is enough to legitimize brief stops and detainment, however insufficient to legitimize a full search. It is important to know the difference of these when being stopped by the police.

Police Stopping Vehicles According to Harris (1993) police can stop vehicles based on probable cause because there is an act that breaks a certain law, which ultimately gives an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Police have probable cause to arrest passengers in a vehicle where an illegal substance are found, as the presence of drugs allows reasonable officers to conclude that probable causes exist that a crime has been committed in their presence. Due to the small and contained area of a vehicle it is reasonable to assume that all occupants have knowledge or possession of the illegal…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis- Probable cause(pc) is when an officer in light of his training and experience reasonably believes that a crime has been committed and the person arrested committed it. Totality of the circumstances (TOC) allows the court to decide if what the officer knew during the arrest can help their belief that the suspect committed the crime. The officers had probable cause that Janay’s life was in danger when they heard her screaming and her eagerness to let them…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even if they do not have probable cause they can still question them and if after questioning them probable cause develops they can arrest them. The police can also…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Probable cause is when an officer has reasonable facts that a crime has occurred or is about to occur, it can’t just be a suspicion. To arrest someone without a warrant the officer must have probable cause before he even approaches the suspect. The police cannot just have a suspicion and arrest or search you, even if they later find out that there suspicion was right like finding something illegal. This means probable cause is not outcome determinative. If this was to be done it’s a violation of the first amendment meaning it was an illegal search and arrest and all evidence and any confessions from the witness cannot be used.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the war on drugs began police use anything they can to stop a vehicle. Traffic stops are motivated by a desire to hunt for drugs, not to enforce traffic laws. (p. 67) Unfortunately only the guilty people of color are heard from, not the innocent people of color. This is because they fear harassment or retaliation.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NYPD implementation of its Stop, Question, and Frisk program under Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD Commissioner Kelly has been a heavy controversial subject for decades (Garrison, 2014). Stop-and-Frisk has also been a contentious law enforcement practice since it was first approved by the Supreme Court (Rudovsky and Rosenthal, 2013). Terry Vs. Ohio established the Stop-and-Frisk act in 1968, concluding that the law enforcement had the right to stop citizens under reasonable suspicion that they have committed, committing or going to commit a crime. It was also concluded that if the law enforcement suspected citizens to be armed and/or dangerous, they could conduct a “frisk” or a pat down to citizens outer clothing in search for weapons.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Probable Cause Exists

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consent is one of the many types of exceptions that typically involves an individual giving law enforcement the right to search him or herself or their residence without a warrant. In order for the consent to be valid, it must be given without coercion or deceit. For the second exception, search incident to lawful arrest, law enforcement officers are allowed to legally search a person or their surroundings immediately after their arrest no matter what the individual was arrested for. Once the suspect is removed from the premises where the arrest took place all searches must come to an end. The purpose of this exception is to locate any possible weapons and provide a sense of safety to the officer during the process of an arrest.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop and Frisk states that police is able to stop and search someone based on a suspicion that this person is involved in criminal activity. The 4th amendment states that police is allowed to search someone if they have the reasonable believe that this person is committing, has committed or is going to commit a crime. This search consists of a quick pat down of the outer clothing. Stop and Frisk started with the Terry vs. Ohio case, in 1976, in which a police officer suspected three men of being about to commit a crime. The officer pointed his gun at them in order to search them.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Essay

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop-and-Frisk Policy Review According to the Washington Post article “Here’s what you need to know about stop and frisk — and why the courts shut it down” by Dylan Matthews, Stop and Frisk is “an NYPD policy wherein police will detain and question pedestrians, and potentially search them, if they have a reasonable suspicion that the pedestrian in question committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony or a Penal Law misdemeanor” (Matthews). This means that if a person appears suspicious of having commit or being about to commit a crime according to a police officer then that police officer has the right to question, search and detain this particular individual. This seems like something that would benefit society, preventing crime and ridding society of wrongdoers. However, there are serious issues with this policy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two police officers,while cursing near noon in a patrol car, observed Brown and another man walking away from one another in an ally in an area with high incidence of drug traffic. The police officers stopped and asked Brown to identify himself and explain what was he doing. Though the reason why the police officer arrested the defendant was because he looked suspicious and as well the police officers had reasonable suspicion that he wasn’t from this side of town. Though Brown refused to identify himself, he was arrested for violation of a Texas statute which makes it a criminal act for a person to refuse his name and address to an officer who has lawfully stopped him and requested for his information. Brown’s…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Supreme Court., which essentially and collectively stated that an LEO has the “right to make a temporary detention based on reasonable suspicion or a traffic stop even if that stop was primarily for the basis of checking out possible criminal behavior for which the officer lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause” (“Racial Profiling as”, n.d., para. 2). One of the cases that pulled us into the reasonable suspicion was the Terry v. Ohio case that leaded to the probable cause standard of our Fourth Amendment. Another case is the Whren v. U.S., where the judge replied to claims of a possible traffic stop by District of Columbia LEO in a neighborhood high drug activity…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stop and frisk should not be legal because many times these searches do…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police must determine a crime happened and establish probable cause from there, it is irrelevant where the suspect in question is currently located. The location of the suspect to be arrested has no bearing on whether or not he/she committed the alleged crime. Therefore, the police establishing probable cause as to the suspect 's location is unneeded. Search warrants are issued upon probable cause to include any areas in which items sought after can be found. Hypothetically speaking, An officer creates a search warrant for evidence related to, a financial scheme.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays