Stop And Frisk Research Paper

Improved Essays
Stop and Frisk states that police is able to stop and search someone based on a suspicion that this person is involved in criminal activity. The 4th amendment states that police is allowed to search someone if they have the reasonable believe that this person is committing, has committed or is going to commit a crime. This search consists of a quick pat down of the outer clothing. Stop and Frisk started with the Terry vs. Ohio case, in 1976, in which a police officer suspected three men of being about to commit a crime. The officer pointed his gun at them in order to search them. One of the men named John Terry argued that the police officer did not have enough reasonable evidence to search then, despite the fact that 2 weapons were found on …show more content…
The Exclusionary Rule was created by the Supreme Court in 1914 and extended to state courts in 1961 (Powerpoint). Originally this rule had three main purpose; to protect citizens from intentional or unintentional wrongdoings by the police, to prevent police from misconduct, and to maintain judicial integrity (powerpoint). One example would be the case Mapp vs Ohio. Police suspected Mapp to be a bomber. They forced their way into the house and searched his home. This search eventually uncovered a different offense. Since the police did not have a reasonable suspicion that Mapp was committing this crime that he eventually was charged for, the Supreme Court later reversed this decision. One law that can over rule the Exclusionary rule is the Good faith Rule. If a search is conducted without knowingly breaking the law, the evidence found may still be used in …show more content…
One component is the protection against excessive bail and fines. This is the second Bill of Rights guarantee that has not been extended to the states (powerpoint). If bail is granted or not depends on different factors such as the nature of the crime, the evidence that has been collected as well as, if the defendant is able to pay his/her bail. The most important factor, however, is the seriousness of the offense. Judges are not allowed to give a unreasonable amount of fines or bail. Another component of the eight amendment is the protection abasing cruel and unusual punishment. Due to many cruel and unusual procedures and punishments, practiced the Supreme Court interpreted "Cruel and Unusual Punishment“. Punishments that were illegal included torture,inhumane treatment and unfair death penalties. Another component is protecting the accused from Miscarriages of Justice. Unfortunately it often happens that people who did not commit the crime are still doing the time for it. The component of the 8th amendment is supposed to help in situations like this. Wrongful convictions often happen when the police or prosecution has made a mistake or there was an eyewitness misidentification. Unfortunately many also plead guilty despite being insolent due to the pressure, they eventually end up taking the plea bargains. A study

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The stop, question and frisk policy emerged from the case of Terry v. Ohio was designed to stop and search individuals based upon reasonable suspicion of an experienced police officer that a criminal activity might be occurring. Yet, the discretions granted to law enforcement agencies have been abused as the enforcement tactics are racially biased toward minority groups. Past analyses showed that police would further determined whether their suspicions are reasonable enough to constitute a stop if the suspect was a Caucasian rather than an African American. Racially discriminatory enforcement of the stop and frisk has important policy implication as race is often viewed as an important factor of suspicion by the police rather than the actual…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    raised, and completed the ‘stop and frisk’. He took them to the police station and Terry and Chifton were charged with possession of a conceal weapon. This moment in time is what sprouted the beginning of an effective case. John Terry believed that the search that Detective McFadden had processed was unconstitutional because of the fact that he felt that there was no facts or complete evidence however the court possessed the gun as evidence. The men were being suspicious walking outside of the store, so the state court believed that it was fine for McFadden to search the men.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police should be allowed to stop and frisk subjects who seem suspect. In the case Terry v. Ohio (1968) the Supreme Court’s ruling allowed the procedures of “Stop and Frisk” to be acceptable. For a stop and first to be considered legal, the police officer must have reasonable suspicion that a crime has already occurred or is about to take place. Only then can a police officer start a line of questioning toward the suspect. However, the “frisk” portion of stop and frisk must only be done if the police officer suspects the individual is carrying any dangerous weapon.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Summary

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stop and Frisk are all about numbers. Commonly in each video the discussion of meeting the quota or getting numbers, is brought up several times. Through out watching the videos there were several concepts that I wanted to discuss. My first reaction was stop and frisk should be eliminated, because people’s rights and privacy are being violated. Then I thought wait a minute maybe it shouldn’t be stopped, but rather tweaked on how the stop and frisks are being carried out.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The exclusionary rule, means the rule that illegally gathered evidence may not be used in a criminal trial. Its evidence that is obtained by a unconstitutional search or seizure is inadmissible at trial. The exclusionary rule enables courts to exclude incriminating evidence from introduction at trial upon proof that the evidence was procured in contravention of a constitutional provision. (Hall, 2015). The rule allows defendants to challenge the admissibility of evidence by bringing a pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The implementation tactics of the stop and frisk policy is racially discriminatory because the number of members of the minority group stopped by a police exceeded the number of whites. Racially discriminatory enforcement of the stop and frisk policy is also a risk factor for the well-being of the society as it promotes prejudice against a certain group of individuals within the criminal justice system. As Gelam et al. (2007) raised the issue of geographic heterogeneity that was found in their analysis of stop-and-frisk. They questioned the legitimacy of the criteria the police used for determination before a stop that caused unjustified disparate impact among the racial demographic of the stop-and-frisk.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There needs to be reasonable suspicion that the individual being stopped either is about to commit a crime or recently committed a crime. The officer utilizing this policy must be able to articulate the facts of his suspicion that indicate why he believed the person was involved in criminal activity. A frisk needs to be based on a reasonable suspicion that the person being frisked may have a weapon of some type. Lastly, the frisk or pat down needs to be narrowed down to the person’s outer clothing for the purposes of finding a weapon and or perceptible contraband.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment protects an individual from illegal searches and seizures. A search is defined as “explorations or inspections, by law enforcement officers, of homes, premises, vehicles, or persons, for the purpose of discovering evidence of crimes or persons who are accused of crimes” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 105). It is considered a search when a person’s expectation of privacy is impinge upon. A seizure occurs when a person or persons or…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am in agreement with the court’s decision to block the ruling that deemed the New York Police Department’s stop and frisk policy unconstitutional (Boyette, & Martinez, 2013). Although the ruling will not stop minorities and Hispanics from being targeted unfairly, it is unconstitutional not to protect the safety and welfare of citizens. If this policy is permitted a lot of innocent people will fall into the category of suspect of being stopped. There should be some responsibility to the public interest in protecting the rights of the people by maintaining trust in law enforcement. In my opinion the NYPD’S policy on stop and frisk is unconstitutional because it could possibly harm the citizens in the community and not help them based on personal feelings of the people who are in the dictating positions.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stop and frisk search is one of the most controversial procedures that the police execute. According to the legal dictionary, stop and frisk refers to “the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect’s outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon.” The officer also questions the person during this process. The policy was put in place to stop crimes before they even happen. The main goals are to get guns off the streets, solve crime sprees and mainly scare criminals.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The importance of exclusionary rule is it that it affiliates itself with cases involving searches and seizures. “ In Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). Weeks involved the appeal of a defendant who had been convicted based on evidence that had been seized by a federal agent without a warrant or other constitutional justification. The Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction, thereby creating what is known as the "exclusionary rule." In Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to the states.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police officers in gun searches face disbelief in courts simply because judges do not believe them or their stories. This is an important issue because this has to do with both our court system and our law enforcement officers, which should be working together to enforce laws and provide justice to individuals that were wronged. For a judge to have this type of problem of disbelief in a court room from a police officer that is truly an ethical issue that should be fixed. I believe that police officers face disbelief because some police officers abuse the authority and power given to them by the state.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays