The FLB accounts for the aspects of languages shared between species and also the properties shared with other cognitive systems such as computers, whereas the FLN is said to account for the property of language that is uniquely human (Hauser, Chomsky, & Fitch, 2002). The FLN is said to include only recursion, which is the only thing making language uniquely human (Hauser, Chomsky, & Fitch, 2002). Pinker and Jackendoff (2004) disagree with Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002) in their claim that recursion is unique to language, claiming that recursion is not unique to language, but the ability to express recursive thoughts is uniquely human. The FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, but what those reasons may be remain a mystery until more research can be done into
The FLB accounts for the aspects of languages shared between species and also the properties shared with other cognitive systems such as computers, whereas the FLN is said to account for the property of language that is uniquely human (Hauser, Chomsky, & Fitch, 2002). The FLN is said to include only recursion, which is the only thing making language uniquely human (Hauser, Chomsky, & Fitch, 2002). Pinker and Jackendoff (2004) disagree with Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002) in their claim that recursion is unique to language, claiming that recursion is not unique to language, but the ability to express recursive thoughts is uniquely human. The FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, but what those reasons may be remain a mystery until more research can be done into