Thomas Aquinas discusses the five argument, …show more content…
Each of the previously mentioned arguments stems from a natural phenomenon and results in the phenomena occurring because of a divine source, which Aquinas relates to God. Aquinas first testimony to God lies in motion, which was inspired by Aristotle. Aristotle suggests that everything in the universe was provoked to move by something or someone and could not have been in movement if not for some primary movement. Aquinas assumed this “primary mover” as the God of Christianity, thus motion. Aquinas’ second argument is that of causation, stems from the idea that an entity or event is responsible for any specific thing. It states that every cause that occurs comes from a singular first cause because there cannot be an infinite chain of efficient causes. The third of the Aquinas arguments are based upon a contingency, which distinguishes between possible and necessary. This states that all thing in existence is possible to exist or not exist. If all things are able to exist they had to have come from something non-existent, which is not achievable by human means. Therefore, there must be a necessary being who was here before all possible beings that do not exist but rather came into being from