Eysenck's Model Of Personality Analysis

I. Theory Description The personality theory that best explains my own personality and life choices is the trait personality theory which makes the assumption that behavior is mainly determined by relative stable personal traits which act as the fundamental units of a person’s personality. Traits therefore act to predispose a person to act in a particular way, in spite of the particular situation he/she is in. This implies that traits need to remain consistent across all situations as well as overtime, but may actually vary between individuals. The reason why individuals vary in traits is a result of genetic differences. Also referred to as psychometric theories, they pay an emphasis on the measurement of personality through the use of psychometric …show more content…
The second is neuroticism or Emotional Stability which is identified with grumpiness versus calm attitude. Neuroticism alludes to an individual 's inclination to wind up resentful or passionate, while stability alludes to the propensity to remain candidly consistent. The third is Psychoticism whereby the people who are high on this attribute have a tendency to experience issues managing reality and might be withdrawn, threatening, non-compassionate and manipulative (Cattell, …show more content…
While most people concur with the fact that individuals can be depicted based upon their identity qualities or traits, scholars keep on debating the quantity of fundamental attributes that make up human identity. While this trait approach to personality has objectivity that some identity speculations need, (for example, Freud 's psychoanalytic hypothesis), it likewise has shortcomings. Probably the most well-known reactions of characteristic hypothesis fixate on the way that attributes or traits are regularly poor indicators of conduct or behavior. While an individual may score high on appraisals of a particular trait, he or she may not generally act that route in each circumstance. Another issue is that characteristic hypotheses don 't address how or why singular contrasts in identity create or rise in some situations (Boeree, 2006). As well, the genetic justification of why individual decisions vary while they might have the same traits is another angle of how this trait perspective is challenged. On the personal level, I haven’t been able to justify some of the traits that I have because they haven’t in any major way played a contributing role in the decision making process that I have to undergo every day, or the choices I have made in my