Written right after the gun plot of 1605, when Queen Elizabeth died in 1603, James Stuart VI was handed the throne and became James I of Britain. The Tragedy of Macbeth is historically based off an eleventh-century Scottish king by the name of Mac Bethad mac Findláich and in short English terms known as Macbeth. The play version William Shakespeare wrote doesn’t exactly follow every single detail to the real Macbeth, but it shows a few similar traits you can compare them both to one another. Macbeth was born around 1005 in Alba, Scotland. Fathered by Findlaech Mac Ruairidh and his mother was Donada the second daughter of Malcolm II. Which was the king of Scotland at the time At the age of seven his parents sent him to a Christian monastery camp to learn about his religion. When Macbeth was 15 years old his cousins Malcolm and Gillecomgain killed his father for an outrageous reason. Macbeth left in anger and didn’t come back till 1032, to become commander of Moray and marry to Gillecomgain’s widow to increase his power in the …show more content…
That was The Tragedy of Macbeth because it was so different from his usual lovey dovey plays. This one was full of tragedy and regret. The historic stories alone make it fell different. With all of its superstitions, it even made me fear and question what to believe. The fact that actors change the title of the play, avoid the word Macbeth on the stage and think that Shakespeare might have cursed the play himself using spells doesn’t help deny the superstition are real. All the historic events of passed play's can also help make it very easy to believe. When it comes down to what I think I would believe the superstition to a certain extent because some of the incidents were not on stage. Their things that happen to everyday people. I say that because there’s so much information you could put on it to make people say the curse is real, but looking towards the other side of things you can’t convince everyone nor make them believe you. It just seems too fake for them to start to believe. You would have to prove it to them so they can see it in their own eyes. Also, incidents did not occur every single time the play took the stage, they just happened to pile up over the 400 years. To make someone a believer just depends on their personality and what they see. At first, I didn't want to believe for this to be a thing, but after