Russian Revolution Causes

Improved Essays
The Russian Revolution was perhaps one the most important events of the 20th century; it cannot be doubted that it had a massive influence on social ideologies and world history. The Russian Revolution, known today as a bloody and chaotic revolution, was characterized by the friction that existed between the citizens of Russia and Tsar Nicholas II. In 1917, two revolutions swept through the country, ending the imperial rule that existed. In March, the February Revolution erupted and forced Nicholas II to abdicate. The Provisional Government was created and established, however, it was later overthrown by the Bolsheviks during the Bolshevik Revolution, where they took over several buildings in Petrograd and created a new government. Many people …show more content…
The people claim that the great loss that the country suffered in the Great War was what led the citizens to rebel since they were unsatisfied with how the country performed and unhappy since they were suffering. This claim can be given merit because if Russia would have never participated in the war, the citizens would have never suffered. However, even if Russia would have never participated in World War I, the country would still be unsatisfied with the Tsar due to his poor leadership skills, which still remained. According to his claim, Thomas Earl Porter said, “In this view, if the disasters of World War I had been avoided, Russia might have followed a peaceful course to a prosperous future” (“Russian Revolutions of 1917”). Although the fact that if the disasters of World War I had been avoided, they would have caused less trouble for the Russian citizens is true, this prevention would have not changed the fact that Nicholas II was still in power and that he had the ability to do with Russia whatever he wanted. Therefore, World War I was not the primary cause of the Russian Revolution because even without its existence, Russia was still in danger of being the center of a civil revolution since the man that ruled it was incompetent. No matter what …show more content…
If this tsar would have never been chosen to as leader during the early 1900’s, perhaps a revolution would have never started and Russia would have never suffered as much as it did when he was in power. It is true that having millions of casualties in a war like World War I was something hard Russia had to face, yet even this wasn’t the main thing that enabled the Russians to start their own revolution. Every war has their own causes that led to it, yet there will always be one that stands out the most -- and in this case it was the Tsar of Russia’s weak

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia before the Russian Revolution. “Nicholas II, who assumed the throne with trepidation upon his father Alexander III’s death, was a clumsy and ineffective leader” (SparkNotes Editors, 2009). This was evident when Nicholas II did not respond to the events of ‘Bloody Sunday’, a catastrophe that caused two-hundred thousand protesters led by Father Gapon peacefully up to the Winter Palace and were met by armed soldiers and mounted Cossacks on the 22th of January, 1905. Nicholas II was present in the Winter Palace at the time so other ministers decided to ‘deal’ with the situation, when Nicholas had returned to the Winter Palace he did not respond to the event and lost respect from the lower classes in Russia, such as workers, and peasants. For ten months it seemed that Nicholas II was going to lose control of Russia until he made his October Manifesto which addressed some of the objectives in the petition that Father Gapon presented, such as free speech and the establishment of the…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main issue regarding the event of WWI is the Tsar’s ill-conceived decision to “take supreme command of the active forces” as Commander-in-Chief, against the advice of his ministers, seeing as from that moment all military disasters would be directly associated with him. This decision, contrary to popular belief, was catastrophic not as a result of the Tsar’s military inexperience, since he had previous experience in the military, but as result of his decision to leave the Tsarina in charge of the running of the government and his successive ignorance concerning the issues and problems faced by his people. Although the Tsar saw this action as being, “for the good of the State,” and a “necessity” to ensure the safety of Russia, it did quite the opposite and was one of the main short-term causes of his downfall, as by leaving the capital he became oblivious to the sufferings of his people and entrusted the Tsarina to govern in his stead which, as predicted, had a devastating impact on Russia as she was inexperienced and distrusted by the people of Russia. This decision led to the people’s consequent loss of hope in the Tsar and his government and triggered outbreaks of violent…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His incompetence was characterized by a proud tyranny that damaged his status and provoked both his opponents and supporters. Throughout his reign, Tsar Nicholas II had increasingly lost connection with his people. On his orders, Cossack guards brutally repressed the 1905 revolution, memorialized as ‘Bloody Sunday’, and the 1912 Lena goldfields protests. Suddenly, people discovered that their leader was not the caring idol they had previously idolized, but a ruthless official determined to keep order. His most grave mistake was when he took over full control of the armed forces in August 1915.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The revolution happened because I didn’t kill him in time to stop it” Felix Yusupov How far did the political and personal influence exerted by Rasputin lead to the downfall of Tsarist Russia?  General information on this topic Nicholas II of Russia was the last emperor of Russia (1st November 1894 to 15th March 1917). His reign saw the dramatic fall of the imperial Russian empire. After the Febuary revolution of 1917 Nicholas was forced to abdicate the throne. In 1918, Nicholas and his family were tragically executed by the Bolsheviks.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constant riots broke out in Russia, and on March 15, 1917 Nicholas II abdicated the throne. He and his family were placed under house arrest in the Ural Mountains. Russia was engaged in a civil war in the spring of 1918. “On the night of July 16, 1918, Nicholas and his family were murdered Bolsheviks under Vladimir Lenin”…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Russia as a whole was already a relatively unstable country when it came to their participation in World War I. Germany was very controlling while Russia’s leader was very incompetent, and thus resulting in chaos when the country began to notice they were losing numerous battles and the war entirely. Russia had already attempted different forms of government, entering the war with tsarist autocracy. Prior to the war, the Russian people were desperate for change, very aware of their state of destitute. Due to the government’s neglect and the people’s constant demands, a revolution began while Nicholas II of Russia, now the former emperor of All Russia, was clinging onto his tsarist autocratic throne. Once the war hit, Nicholas was caught completely…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of the war, Russia was forced to give up Port Arthur and the southern half of Sakhalin Island to Japan, to move out Manchuria, to recognize Korea as a Japanese protectorate and grant Japanese fishing rights north of Vladivostok. After losing the war, people in outrage, due to russian weakness, helped lead to the Russian Revolution, which was a wave of conflicts that lasted more than a year and still didn’t manage to overthrow the Tsar’s government. The February Revolution was the first major event and it was chaotic. The people had this unrest towards the Tsar for his cruel treatment toward them which includes, poor working conditions for city workers and peasants being treated poorly by patricians. Nicholas II was incompetent and didn’t realize that he was failing Russia…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The collapse of the Old Regime could have been avoided if there was a strong leader for Russia. The last Tsar, Nicholas II, was an incapable leader which led to him making a series of mistakes that brought an end to the Old Regime. Nicholas was not a natural leader, which he was aware of, and he decided to avoid any changes and follow his father’s rule. Nicholas was easily persuaded by those advising him and a lot of the time he followed bad advice . However, he was also stubborn and he believed that it was his divine right to rule .…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The historical events that took place prior and after the Russo-Japanese War are very important/significant to analyze the eloquent contribution towards the Russian Revolution of 1905. The Russian Revolution was not only based on the outcome to the Russo-Japanese War, rather a collective conflict which arose way before the war. Russia was no where near a perfect nation, more like a struggling nation. Their political ideology, and politics in general as well as their rising population created unrest feelings from the general public. The government not only struggled to provide for the nation but also had challengers who wanted to change the face of Russia, more or less political terrorists!…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsarist Russia Essay

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist regime in Russia had begun deteriorating in the early 1900s due to widespread political, social, and economic instability. Both the Russo-Japanese War and WW1 exacerbated the situation, leading to higher levels of discontent amongst the people. Below I will analyse the fall of Tsarist Russia from 3 aspects: the political, social, and economic before and after the wars, and explain how each of these factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Tsarist regime. The extent of political instability in Tsarist Russia became apparent in the 1900s.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Due to late industrialisation, the economy of russia was very weak, leading to there being no way for russia to provide for its people, soldiers and even war supplies. The russian army was even left with ridiculous supplies, many soldiers fighting barefoot and without weapons.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peasant Revolution In Russia

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    The war sped things up, but a revolution would have occurred anyway because of the unfair conditions peasants had to live in for years. At the end of the day, the working class lived their days filled with endless hours of work that wasn’t worth their wages. They could not afford to keep their families alive and since they could not own their own land their homes were cramped and drafty. They also were not able to own their own land, they had landlords who they owed too much money . Furthermore, even though World War I was a major setback in Russian civilization, Russia was not doing well at all to begin with.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Umme Rahman December 11, 2014 Global History Essay Section 9E Citizens who appreciate and agree upon their ruler have no reason to act upon or rebel against the ruler, which explains why Russian civilians rebelled against Tsar Nicholas Iain 1915, Tsar Nicholas II too complete control of Russia. He was not the ruler the people hoped he would be. By 1917, most Russian civilians lost hope in him, which led to the February Revolution which happened after World War I.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the first socialist country in the world, Russia had a lengthy and tough time to change and develop the country in 1917. The Russian Revolution of 1917 covers the major events such as the February Revolution and the October Revolution that result in the established of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution caused the encounter of labors and people. Their sacrifices and protests eventually made the revolution come true. Since the socialist government overthrew the czarist government, there were both political and economic exchanges occurred in the revolution.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolution according to the Webster Dictionary "is a sudden, extreme or complete change in the way people live work etc". During the World War 1 Russia witnessed the transition to a different and renewed that brought with itself some good and bad consequences; however it is necessary to analyze and understand each phase of the process in order to create a concept and a point of view. The Russian revolution has three main causes: political, social and economics.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays