Can Facts Be True Essay

Superior Essays
The key terms that should be identified from the prescribed title are ‘facts’ and ‘experts’. The key term fact can be defined as something that is known or proved to true meaning. Facts are verified through a mutual agreement of experts. Facts are used as guidelines for non-experts. They support our argument, ideas and opinions on specific matters. Although a fact may be regarded as a fact, there is no way to tell whether a fact is right or wrong. Thus, I ask the question “How can facts be verified of being true?”.
The first Area of Knowledge which I will be looking at is Natural Sciences. In Natural Sciences a fact is a careful and repeatable observation, often called empirical evidence. Facts in Natural Sciences are often regarded as being true as they are thought to have been proven by scientists. Facts are the building blocks to scientific theories, which many then interpret as being the same as facts. Despite
…show more content…
For example, I make a comparison between two football players, player A and player B. Between the 2 players I idolize only of them, player A. At the same time only one of the player is better than the other, which in this case is player B. Despite being biased towards player A, my personal knowledge says that I believe that player A is better player between the 2, as my emotions have appealed towards player A. However, looking at shared knowledge, in this case statistics, statistics would tell me that player B is the better player between the 2 as player B is statistically better than player A. Thus, proving me wrong that the player which I idolize, player A, is in fact worse than player B. In conclusion for this counterclaim, to an extent emotions can be a means for an individual to reach a conclusion, however, at the same time it isn’t reliable as emotions tend to ignore the facts which disprove the beliefs which an individual

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    However, this is not the case. Facts are scientific data that’s only been confirmed to a degree where it would be difficult to defy, and theories are an explanation of these facts (gould, 1981). The misunderstanding of these…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within that case, you will find mentioned the second case: Nordmann v. National Hotel Company, 425 F.2d. 1103 (5th Cir. 1970). That case establishes the basis by which the court in Margreiter determined the level of duty the New Hotel Monteleone owed to Mr. Margreiter. It may help you with the remainder of this homework.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yellow Rain Proofs

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout history and time there has been many truths that had been proven to actually be true, i.e earth is not flat, gravity, ancient civilization, technology, man on moon, etc. Most of these truths have proofs to support that it is true because it is neither has taken place or some kind of scientific studies had been done to confirm it. But what about the truths that does not has proof? Or proofs that do not have scientific supporting? Will that also be considered legitimate truths or proofs?…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eight Essential Terms in Writing Audience: An audience is a person or group of individuals to whom the writer is trying to address. A writer uses a particular style of language, content, and tone according to what the audience knows. In the book, Writing about Writing, Keith Grant-Davie wrote a piece which discussed audiences. He explains the precise meaning of an audience as, "1) Any people who happen to hear or read a discourse, 2) a set of readers or listeners who form part of an external rhetorical situation, 3) the audience that the writer seems to have in mind, 4) the audience roles suggested by the discourse itself" (355). Everything, whether written or spoken, have an audience.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Sterba’s Subjectivism in Ethics how should we as individuals question some strong ethical questions. In the reading Sterba uses the example of gay rights. Is it okay, or is it wrong. With many people going to both sides of whether it is write or wrong. Some think that there is nothing wrong with the LGBTQ community while others are totally against it, and we think of it based on our moral judgments.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout this week, we read two articles. They are “What is this thing called Science?---Science as knowledge derived from the facts of experience” by Alan Chalmers and “Philosophy of Educational Research-- Quantitative and Qualitative Research: False Dualism” by Richard Pring respectively. From the first reading, the message that the author wanted to argue is that science is not exactly fact, and this is a common way that people identify science. They tend to think that facts are obtained through observation and experiments.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inference: Video Analysis

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Inferences are viewed to be conclusion made for unknown situations based on known knowledge. Inferences are made based on facts or evidence such that one is certain about the occurrence of a particular event. Inferences can be made based on clues in the sense that the occurrence of a particular situation implies that an unknown situation, based on facts, is going to take place. Inferences are reliable as a result of experience or the occurrence of certain patterns that eventually lead to an event. They are also made based on observations such that a person is certain about the occurrence of an event.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a pretty frequent reader of the news, I try to keep myself updated on current events. I find it interesting and quite important as a citizen of this country. I consider myself on moderate liberal, so I tend to read and like the New York Times and Washington Post. I get daily emails each day during the week from The Skim and News York Times Evening Briefing in attempt to get an overall of what is currently happening around me. The Skim and New York Times Evening Briefing are definitely liberal sources.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Knowledge is Power Nowadays it seems as if many people are taking their educations for granted. They no longer realize that knowledge is power and what they can be capable of accomplishing if they apply the knowledge they have obtained to everyday life. Knowledge is power, and without it…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The ancient people in North America did not have an organized writing system like China or many other ancient societies. Although there are some forms of symbolic representations existed, people in North America did not have writings as far as our understanding now.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Correspondence Theory Over the last century, the world has become a place of everlasting technological advancement. The yearn for knowledge and advancements in academics has brought about an magnificent change in the world. Societies across the globe are rapidly changing and evolving due to new discoveries in the fields of knowledge, but many may ask the question: How can this knowledge be trusted? How is knowledge justified?…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is certainty necessary for knowledge? To really answer this question, we have to define what knowledge really is. Then in turn, we have to define what certainty really is. Truth also should be defined in order to help better understand the question. Once all three of these terms are defined then the main question can be dealt with.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers continue to revisit these ideas, supporting their initial claims and making counter arguments to rebuttals. While realism supports the idea that science is based on facts and the truth, using scientific theories to accurately depict the world, anti-realism claims that the purpose of science is to find theories that are empirically correct due to one’s own observations of the physical world. Ultimately, the debate of realism and anti-realism concern the aim of science, trying to discover why scientists perform certain actions opposed to others as a result of their individual beliefs. It comprises of the nature of scientific knowledge, how we can attain and are limited by it, and the overall interpretation of the scientific enterprise. Inconsistencies can be highlighted in both arguments, however, both embrace a certain truth if observed through an unbiased perspective.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hence it is important that within the domains of “science” we should form our own beliefs upon the evidence and support each case…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays