Sterba's Subjectivism In Ethics Summary

Decent Essays
In Sterba’s Subjectivism in Ethics how should we as individuals question some strong ethical questions. In the reading Sterba uses the example of gay rights. Is it okay, or is it wrong. With many people going to both sides of whether it is write or wrong. Some think that there is nothing wrong with the LGBTQ community while others are totally against it, and we think of it based on our moral judgments. We as mortals just assume what is best in our opinion but there is not right or wrong answer because it is just based on facts rather than opinions. Just with the gay rights example there is no right or wrong answer, because no one really knows.
When making claims about certain subjects do we base it on our own facts and opinions or let others

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    De La Torre’s book Doing Christian Ethics from the Margins contributes to the ever growing number of Christian voices on the margins that seeks to challenge the dominant Eurocentric culture in the United States. Although this work is largely geared towards the classroom, it is a work that challenges all people to think and act theologically and ethically from an oftentimes neglected perspective, that of the disenfranchised or those who reside on the margins. To begin, De La Torre has the reader to critically think about the environment in which students study, the classroom. He writes, “The classroom is appropriately named, for it is indeed a room of class – a room where students learn the class they belong to and the power and privilege…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anthony Weston is an American Philosopher, teacher, and writer. He has written a book titled “Practical Companion to Ethics” that does discus Ethics, Religion, and Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics. Weston also discusses constructive moral dialogue. Constructive moral dialogue is concepts and ideas that makes our relationship with others easier. It allows us to get along with others that have different beliefs and concepts.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I support the Sprott Shaw Philosophy Statement as a whole which includes a principle message of all campuses delivering the same curriculum with similar objectives. I believe this unity across all the 16 campuses of Sprott Shaw will help produce students with similar skills and abilities. This similarity will enable Sprott Shaw to create standards they require of their student graduates such as the need to receive at least seventy percent in their courses. This in turn will protect the reputation of Sprott Shaw to produce successful graduates which will assist students in finding jobs as their potential employers will respect that they received their LPN educators from this college which will assist in the enrollment rates in future students as it will be known that their nursing program is respected. Due to all campuses keeping strict regulations and adhering to…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It seems Herrera tries to justify his wrong doings and make excuses for his unethical behavior in the beginning of his interview. Herrera’s actions are related to “cognitive rationalizations” because he admits in his interview that he was truly convinced that what he was doing was moral. (Fitch. 2011.) He was taught no other way and was being praised for it by his superiors. He said he knew it was wrong, at times, but, also, thought that is what he needed to do to get drug dealers and guns off the streets.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Honesty

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In all honesty I am not that big of a fan of using ethos or pathos for a few simple reasons. First, they can both be very easily questioned and argued. For ethos, if you’re only using your character to support your argument then if anyone has ever seen you do anything wrong and they have proof of it then they can/will destroy your argument and support. Also I can see multiple ways that your competitor could simply bring question to your character, even if they bring forth those questions through lies and trickery it will still cause damage to your claim. Now with pathos I have the same basic problem.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effective Messaging The documentary Inequality for All focuses on what happens to an economy when income inequality rates begin to sore sky high. Narrated by Robert Reich, he talks about how America came to be a nation of massive income inequality, the consequences of it and how to solve it. One of the most impressive things the film does, is a take a topic people study for years and turn it into an easily understandable 90-minute film. The documentary Inequality for All effectively got its message across through, accurate statistics, memorable visual aids, and real-life stores and firsthand accounts.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Views on Moral Relativism Relativism is one of the main concepts of ethics. Most moral theorist relate to ethics within their articles that they had written, either being against moral relativism or being supporters. Throughout Mary Midgley’s article “Trying Out One’s New Sword,” she argues about the problems that are related to moral relativism. Another philosopher, John Arthur wrote an article “Religion, Morality and Conscience,” which also addresses the issue of relativism from the perspective of foundationalism.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the last several decades the topic of animal testing for cosmetic purposes has taken the world by surprise. The throngs of questions concerning this matter have skyrocketed, yet how often are these concerns addressed? For that matter, how many citizens even understand what cosmetic animal testing entails? As defined by Humane Society International, “the term ‘animal testing’ refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology” (About Animal Testing). These procedures typically result in pain, physiological distress, and in extreme cases, death.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Vaughn (2015), ethical subjectivism or moral subjectivism is a philosophical theory that suggest moral truth are determined on an individual level. Under this theory, the individual does not have to justify his/her position of why certain actions are considered to be morally right or wrong to anyone. Nor does the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays