Kantian Moral Theory: Categorical Imperatives

Improved Essays
QA: 1
A. Introduction:
Kantian moral theory is one of the most importance and famous theories in our world that people should know about it. From what I had learnt, I got that Kantian moral theory has two important points, which are respecting others1 and having right intentions1 when you communicate with others or do some things. The two things are still working in the present to help to promote the whole society. Kantian moral theory is originated from a philosopher whose name is Kant1. Kantian moral theory has two important Categorical Imperatives2 (2 rules). In the following, I will tell you the first version of the Categorical Imperatives2 with my understanding. Then, I will also give you the detailed explanation about the second version
…show more content…
First, through the universal law2, all the people in the world will have the awareness of making our world more and more peaceful and beautiful. For example, all the people will be glad with the peaceful situation without the war by communicating with each country gently. Second, we will become a good or kind person with the reversibility2. When we want someone to help us, we should consider if we can also help them as the same time, then the relationship between they and us will be better. Third, be nice with the people around you instead of using them3. When you see the people around you on the bus, you can smile with them or say “hi” with them even if you do not know them, you will not only make them happy, but you will also make yourself happy. Last but not least, you should respect others1 with the Kantian moral theory. Everyone is equal to each other in our world, no matter how great, rich, or bad you are, you are equal with the other in the world. Therefore, the rich should respect the poor without laughing at them or looking down upon them.
E. Conclusion
In my opinions, most aspects of Kantian moral theory that I have described above are great, thus, I will do some the Kantian moral theory in my daily life. Kantian moral theory still works nowadays. But according to the different people, different ideas, and different areas, people’s views maybe different on the universal law2. Therefore, from my point of view, the moral theory can change with the different

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative means that anytime an act is made, it must be able to stand as a universal law. It provides us with a pattern of morals that does not contain anthropological information. There are five major complaints to Kant’s theory. First, people believe that it is too hard to apply to real life. Next, it does not include enough acts that are common in real life.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative has three formulations but only two will be discussed. In the first formulation of the categorical imperative Kant states, “ Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that should become a universal law”(Justice, “The Supreme Principle of Morality”). With this statement maxim means being a principle or a general rule, will means to intend to do something, and universal law states how all people ought to act without any exceptions. Basically do act on things with good intent and not self-interest because then it would not be any moral worth if things were just done for the…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This brings Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory of the Categorical Imperative, which is based on three rules. First, someone must refer to a maxim in everything he does and test if this maxim can be a universal law, in a way that everyone else agrees on it. Second, every human being is priceless and has ““value beyond price”, so no human could use another to accomplish a self-interested task.” (Woolsey, 2010). The third golden rule is to treat others as they want to be treated.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To achieve the goal of thriving in a world where there is a complete and undeniable direction towards moral humanity would greatly benefit society. Knowing the distinction of when you are in the right or the wrong of morality could prevent many issues that we experience in society today. Immanuel Kant crafted an impressive system known as the categorical imperative, which requires a thorough examination to truly understand its aspects. I believe it is also important to analyze the aspects of the categorical imperative to determine if it is applicable in today’s societies.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thank you for writing to me about this. I know that you are in a difficult situation in your marriage and that it can be tough to know if an action is morally right. With that said, I cannot advocate your decision to have an affair no matter what the consequences are. My moral beliefs are centered on two rules that help me determine whether a decision is morally good or bad. Your actions are not morally right according to the two rules that I call the categorical imperatives and I would like to explain why.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good will, inclinations, and categorical imperatives are clearly addressed in the statement which the paper started off from. To act out of "good will" for Kant means to act out of a sense of moral obligation or "duty". In other words, the moral agent does a particular action not because of what it produces (its consequences) in terms of human experience, but because he or she recognizes by reasoning that it is morally the right thing to do and thus regards him or herself as having a moral duty or obligation to do that action. In the case of good will, man recognizes that there is a need for universal law, and even if they do not want to participate in it, they recognize that it is the morally right thing to do. Categorical imperative: "Act as if the maxim from which you act were to become through your will a universal law."…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the major tenets with this theory is that morality is based strictly on the intentions of an individual rather than on the consequences of an action itself. The problem with this aspect of this theory is that we can have the greatest intentions possible but still have catastrophic consequences. Secondly, Kant argued that for an act to be moral, that it must always be done from duty. The problem here is that if we adhere to the “wrong” moral laws to begin with, then even if we have and engage in perfect duty to those laws, then our actions would also be wrong by default. Then of course, those duties have to universal and without contradiction.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Immanuel Kant is a very famous German philosophers and an opponent of utilitarianism. Categorical Imperatives is an ethical theory developed by him, to use as a guideline for morality. There are three main formulations in this concept, which are the formula of universal, the formula of humanity and the formula of autonomous. In this paper, I am going to use Kant’s ethical theory to find directions about the morality of abortion. Besides that, I will relate the findings of my case study to the flaws of Categorical Imperatives.…

    • 3077 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kantian Perspective and Animal Rights Introduction According to the American Pet Products Association, Americans spend 60.28 billion dollars on their pets in 2015 alone. Domesticated animals have integrated their way into every part of the globe. Our pets have become a part of the family, but consistently animals moral rights are challenged. This essay will explore the Kantian perspective, its views on animal rights, and show that animals are deserving of rights under the Kantian perspective.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Through his moral theory and more specifically through two aspects of the categorical imperative procedure, the universal law formulation and the humanities formulation, it becomes clear that Kant’s theory sometimes requires people to sacrifice self-interests for the benefice of others. Finally, it has been made clear that Kant’s moral theory is a deviation from John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, which only cares about the results of action. Therefore, such a move by Kant to include motives into moral calculations shows an overall broadening of moral…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) " So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the same time as a principle establishing universal law. "(2) "Act so as to treat humanity, whether in your own person in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to have a set of rules like Kant’s, to help guide us through difficult situations. Rules are what help regulate the actions of society as a whole. If everyone were allowed to do their own thing without being held accountable for our actions, society would crumble. We should assess each dilemma with the mindset that the outcome of our decisions should be one that we would hope would apply to others as well. Realistically, the outcome of a decision, especially with the expectation that there are no exceptions to this rule, is going to be subjective.…

    • 2275 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays