Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

Improved Essays
To achieve the goal of thriving in a world where there is a complete and undeniable direction towards moral humanity would greatly benefit society. Knowing the distinction of when you are in the right or the wrong of morality could prevent many issues that we experience in society today. Immanuel Kant crafted an impressive system known as the categorical imperative, which requires a thorough examination to truly understand its aspects. I believe it is also important to analyze the aspects of the categorical imperative to determine if it is applicable in today’s societies. The categorical imperative can be broken down to better understand its meaning. An imperative is basically something that should be done, or is something in which someone …show more content…
My immediate reaction towards the categorical imperative is that it is a reliable system to use to base key decisions off of. However, I also feel that it should be used as a guideline rather than a strict standard to base all of your choices off of. I think people in society have the ability to use their common sense to make decisions that sometimes don’t necessarily follow the categorical imperative. The classic example of not being able to lie to a person with an unconcealed weapon who is looking for someone greatly illustrates my point. Although this certain scenario is highly unlikely to happen to us, I feel that we would sense the danger, and base our decisions off of our natural instincts. Even though we sometimes don’t have all the information of a situation present to us, I think it’s important to rely on our senses to make a proper judgement call to prevent a negative occurrence. I think the best thing to do when contemplating the use of the categorical imperative is to reevaluate the situation if it doesn’t feel right. To bind ourselves wholly to principles and definitions would be insulting to our biological capabilities. One thing that I find difficult about the use of the categorical imperative in society is that it seems that a lot of people don’t know that it exists. I had no idea that the system existed prior to attending this philosophy course. I feel that a large portion of society knows about The Golden Rule, which is a similar system, but still has some major differences. I think one of the motivations that drives the application of the categorical imperative is that you would receive the same moral treatment from other people that you would display towards others. This would prove to be difficult due to the fact that the universal use of the categorical imperative has a low awareness

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypothetical imperative is applicable to those with the desire, end or goal they want to achieve. And so, if I don’t desire to get an A on the exam or maybe I am satisfied with a C grade, the hypothetical imperative if you want an A on the exam, you ought to study does not apply to me. On the other hand, a categorical imperative is a rule or moral directive from reason that is binding without condition; a command that applies to all rational beings, no matter what. Actions done in accordance with these rules are morally good or morally…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is where Kant’s categorical imperatives come into play. As stated before, the first is that we are to never treat people as a means. Secondly, we are to adhere to a maxim that can govern all people and eventually become universal law. There is an incredible difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical imperative. The difference is evident because to the Kantian, morality should be based on the categorical imperative, or something that is help to be good in any scenario at any time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many ethical theories require the individual to take a hard look inside and question the decisions that they are making to ensure that their decisions are matching their code of ethics that they want to or are attempting to live by. Neither, Ethical Egoism and Emmanuel Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative are exceptions to this. Although both of these ethical codes fit under the same umbrella of looking inward at an individuals own personal decisions, they also have some very important differences. This essay, looks at both of these codes and compares as well as contrasts them and then gives a final decision as to which one, with the opinion of the author, is better.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral duties don’t always align with feelings, we may desire to perform a particular action because it seems to be right. However Immanuel Kant, states that morality is about good will (motives), not consequences. The only thing unqualifiedly good is a good will. Pertaining to this scenario, I think Kant would refer to this as a Hypothetical Imperative, since he considers lying as wrong all the time. The rational person, one of good character, would create their own inner struggle, attempting to justify the lie.…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral theory that the nurse would use to support the patient then would be Kantianism’s Deontology which states that it is the intention (what he calls maxims or good will) that is truly weighed against one's duties/responsibilities through a string of tests (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.14). Before any decision can be made Kant puts it through a series of three tests called the Categorical Imperative (C.I.) in order to see if the act is permissible or prohibited, where the situation only needs to pass one because Kant claims that it will then pass them all (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.17). The first test within the C.I. is universality formulation that states that an act is permissible only if it can be created into universal rule and…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This brings Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory of the Categorical Imperative, which is based on three rules. First, someone must refer to a maxim in everything he does and test if this maxim can be a universal law, in a way that everyone else agrees on it. Second, every human being is priceless and has ““value beyond price”, so no human could use another to accomplish a self-interested task.” (Woolsey, 2010). The third golden rule is to treat others as they want to be treated.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first Critique there are only hints as to the form Kant's moral theory would take,[15] and the account of practical reason in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and Critique of Practical Reason (1788) is radically new. Kant now claims to have discovered the supreme principle of practical reason, which he calls the Categorical Imperative. (More precisely, this principle is an imperative for finite beings like us, who have needs and inclinations and are not perfectly rational.) Notoriously, Kant offers several different formulations of this principle, the first of which runs as follows: “act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law” (4:421). (On the different…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe it is wrong for someone to expect other people to follow a certain law that one does not follow themselves, that is hypocritical behavior that does not fall under good-will. It wouldn't be equal nor fair to the people who follow that certain law and are able to form a master within themselves that allows them to be bound by a law. From a moral perspective, categorical imperative has its pros and cons. Although most of it is true, it’s sometimes not beneficial; which is why many people lack to follow the law and act in a hypocritical behavior. The purpose of categorical imperative is to do something that will help others for the sake of the preserving the human race, rather than the sake of self-will.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The categorical imperative idea was introduced by Immanuel Kant in 1785 in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals book. Before I get into what his categorical imperative is all about, let me tell you how Kant saw morals. Kant believes that there are different motives that pull at our human will making us take different paths or choosing different ways to do things. He then goes more into depth saying that there are two classes of morals, selfish decisions and rational obligations. Unfortunately us being normal human beings most of our morals are more on the selfish side and as long as we choose to indulge in our selfish ways, they are not moral.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the hypothetical imperative, a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose. Doing something purely for the attainment of happiness is an example of this. The categorical imperative, however, is much more elaborate and noteworthy. In the categorical imperative, action is necessary in and of itself. One cannot find evidence of the categorical imperative in observed decisions or actions; it must be derived a priori, before experience and based on pure reason.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    '(3) "Act according to the maxims if a universally legislative member of a merely potential kingdom of ends. " In other words, Kant argues that particular action requires conscious thought of the rule governing the action. Whether if everyone should follow that rule, and if the rule is acceptable for universal action, it should be adopted. If the rule is unacceptable, then it should be rejected. In order to understand whether or not an action follows Kant's "categorical imperative," we must prescribe those norms that we wish to be universal…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays