The Conquest Of Cyrus

Improved Essays
A modern military strategist would see Cyrus as a military officer guilty of mission creep. Cyrus expanded what was said to be a purely defensive mission into the triumphant establishment of an empire. Cyrus was not satisfied by simply pushing back the advancing Assyrian army, he wanted to annihilate them permanently. He was able to act for his own agenda despite being by all means a hired mercenary or at least a mercenary by obligation to his family. How is it then that Cyrus was able to turn his defense mission for Cyaxares into an offensive charge for his own glory? Cyrus is able to turn his defenses mission against the aggressive Assyrian army into a conquest for all of Asia by amassing an army large enough and loyal enough to act on …show more content…
The first incident occurs when Cyrus asks permission from Cyaxares to launch the first campaign against the neighboring countries. Cyrus through his oration convinces Cyaxares that being offensive is the best strategy to avoid harm. Cyaxares eventually concedes and allows Cyrus to go forward, however Cyrus waits and says no to Cyaxares initial remark. Cyrus then waits and sends the following message, “Report this to him in front of everyone. Nevertheless since it seems [good] to him, I shall now march” (p.109). Cyrus had disregard Cyaxares initial demand for him to march and made it a point to show that he will go when he wishes clearly showing Cyaxares he has power. This moment also gives Cyrus the opportunity to start his military operations offensively as apposed to defensively per his orders. Secondly Cyrus clearly demonstrates that he has power of Cyaxares through the following quote, “ Do not send for him with threats; and when you declare you are alone, do not deliver threats to large numbers, lest you teach the to think nothing of you” (p.134) This is a clear threat by Cyrus in which he indicates two things to Cyaxares. The first being that Cyaxares is alone and that his own men chose Cyrus over him. The second being that because Cyaxares has no men, he has no power and that therefore leads to people thinking of “nothing” of him. This interaction clearly shows the paradigm shift, where Cyrus has become the one in charge, the commanding officer. Finally there exists an episode in which it is explicitly show that the soldiers only follow the orders of Cyrus and think nothing of Cyaxares. “The Medes followed Cyaxares, (for Cyrus gave them a nod to do so)” (p.174) Cyaxares own men would have rather followed Cyrus had he not corrected them. Cyrus destroys any shred of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cyrus was responsible for uniting Persia under his leadership (Spielvogel 40). While both kings of the Assyrian Empire and the Persian Empire used violence to obtain their respective empires, they both obtained them in different ways. Assyrian rulers were more known for being cruel and using terror tactics during war such as burning their prisoners or cutting off body parts. With every piece of territory that they captured, they took the citizens of that territory as their prisoners. Those that tried to rebel against them were tortured.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A main figure acting as an external force against all sides involved in the Wars, is Alcibiades. He influenced multiple people and was highly appreciated in numerous nations, giving him a wide berth for manipulation of important figures to cater to his own plans. Involved in the Peloponnesian conflict since the battle involving Potidaea, Alcibiades’ ideas were respected among influential persons; given the fact that he had been brought up by esteemed member of society, Socrates (Krentz, 2003). Showing his political strength in Athenian court, Alcibiades overruled current acting general Nicias’ logical judgements on proposed expeditions such as Sicily (where he outlined the fact that it would be a work of great difficulty), for his own personal gain…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicias and the Importance of Persuasive Leadership How did Nicias fail to convince the Athenian assembly that the Sicilian Expedition was a strategic error? His arguments, while valid and logical, are not sufficient to win over the assembly to undo their vote of war. Not only does Thucydides have incomplete information about these events, but Thucydides’ prior knowledge of Nicias’s failure colors the way he reconstructs Nicias’s ineffective arguments against war. Nicias attempts to dissuade the assembly from a war it has already approved by discussing the lack of a compelling reason to aid the Egesteans, the challenge of conquering and ruling Sicily, and the fragile truce with Sparta. Because Nicias’s appeals are ultimately unsuccessful, Thucydides uses this failure as an example of ineffective leadership in the Athenian state.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Out of the three characters Cyrus is the only one who continues to push his metaphorical rock up the hill. The Rastafarians believe that they Holy Emperor will be coming for them to take them far away from the wickedness of Babylon since they have paid for the sins of their fathers. It is dramatic irony that the ship will not be coming for the people of the Dungle and that they will be forced to continue their Sisyphean task of paying for their fathers’ sins. Camus’ theory that Sisyphus is happy pushing the rock up the hill with the hope that one day it will not roll down the other side. As readers one can see that there is no hope for Cyrus, he is stuck waiting for something that will never happen.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his work, The Histories, the Greek historian Herodotus gives an account of Darius and Xerxes, who were two members of the Achaemenidai family, and ruled as Kings during the Greco-Persian Wars. Persian kingship was different from earlier Greek kingship. I believe, however, that if we examine the virtues that Darius and Xerxes had, we could see they shared similar values than the Greeks. In this essay, I will argue that Herodotus does indeed provide us with a narrative that indicates that Darius and especially Xerxes did possess values that defined them as good leaders. Persian leadership resembled Greek leadership in the following ways: kings portrayed as intermediaries between gods and men; virtues of wisdom and patience; good military leadership…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Salamis Summary

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This was especially disheartening for the Persian army. Xerxes ordered the attack first. Also, this battle was very costly for Persia. They needed even more ships for supplies and to also transport troops. On the other hand, the Greeks were proud, not only did they trick the Persian army, which was proven a game-changing tactic, they were also triumphant over an army more than three times their size.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Themistocles was arguable one of the most significant political and military figures of Athens during the fifth century. He is often remembered for his emphasis on naval power and for his influence on the success of the Greeks during the Persian wars. However, more can be learned from studying Themistocles than war strategy and political conduct. In his work, Themistocles, Plutarch examines the role ambition plays throughout Themistocles’ life. His evaluation serves to highlight the boundaries and dangers of ambition, while emphasizing its double-sided nature.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In early fifth century B.C.E, the Greeks constantly suffered from the threat of being conquered by the Persian Empire. Although Persian power vastly exceeded, the Greeks unexpectedly triumphed. Similar to the tale of David versus Goliath, the Greeks defeated the Persians due to divine support and Greek unity. The threat of the Persian Empire expansion into Greece and the imminent possibility that they would lose their freedom and become slaves to the Persians, so horrified the Greeks that they united together and risked their lives in order to preserve the one thing they all shared in common, their "Greekness".…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the fact that the movie itself describes a war which is typically in need of a contingency leader to defend Sparta from the Persian attack, Leonidas shared with the Spartans a vision that admires the Freedom of their people. Leonidas leadership passed through the different elements of the transformational leadership, form creating a strategic vision and communicating it till building the commitment of the team which is revealed in their lives sacrifice decision. All of the above will guide us to say that Leonidas was a transformational leader and not transactional, he built a team, motivate his members and ensured a one spirit group. In the following I’ll be studying some of the leadership characteristics and evaluating them on a scale from 0 to…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Is Odysseus Selfish

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Odysseus is a self-centered leader who allows his own personal desires to cloud his judgement as a leader which puts not only himself, but his men in danger. When Odysseus and his men come upon a cave full of sheeps and crates full of cheese, Odysseus decides to enter the cave. Even when his men advise him to take some cheese and drive the lambs to the ship and set sail, odysseus lets his curiosity get the best of him and decides to wait for the giant to return. “...We looked around at everything inside…. My men came pleading, take these cheese, come back, throw open all the pens, and make a run for it. ….…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, humans have invaded and conquered the lands of other human beings, with only the interest of themselves in mind. Invasions ranging from the time of the Persian Empire to the settling of the New World exemplify the maltreatment of other humans for personal gain as a recurring process. At the beginning of the cycle is the Persian Empire, a prime example of how humans invaded and conquered previously owned land for self-interest. In order to have the largest empire and increase the number of accessible trade routes, the Persians continuously went on conquests to take land from other empires using brute force. In particular, in 525 BC the Persians took on the great Egyptian Empire.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With his father present, he strives to mimic his traits and is further exposed to Odysseus characters which influences him. Odysseus shows the traits of being cunning when he is disguised a beggar in the palace. As Telemachus is being exposed to the brilliant cunning by his father, his knowledge is also increasing as he is learning about different strategies of war. The trait of cunning was seen at the beginning of the book when makes the decision not to inform his mother of his decision to travel in search of his father. He shows great cunning, as he informs his nurse not to bring it to his mother’s attention until she askes for his whereabouts.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the most important quality of an honorable leader? In The Odyssey, Odysseus is looked upon as an admirable leader for his accomplishment. While reading this epic, the majority people can notice some characteristics that a leader needs to possess. Odysseus shows multiple positive character traits, but the most important one is persistence. Persistence is the main factor of telling a good leader from a bad one because without it you have no way of solving any solution.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So, Cyrus decided to act into his own hands because of the complaints there were. While taking over…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yvonne Mascorro AC0617108 Assignment 2 HS150 World Civilization I “Describe the conquests of Alexander the great and analyze the legacy of his empire”. In just twelve years, Alexander the Great conquered many territories, and took control of lands from west of the Nile to east of the Indus. Alexander took control over Syria, Palestine, Egypt, most of the Middle East, and many more. Alexander was one of the eight children of Philip II.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays