This type of economy is beneficial for all members of the state since the wealth is evenly distributed to all (“Marxism”). To reach this state of equality among members of the state there must be a social revolution to attain this state. The ‘Bourgeois’ according to Marx and Engels are capitalistic upper-class members who own the means of production in a capitalist society, and ‘Proletariat” is the lower working class (Marx and Engels 63-66). This type of economic plan is modified to include some capitalist ideas and used in many Fascist regimes such as Hitler’s Germany or Mussolini’s Italy (“Fascism”). The economic ideas of both ideologies have the ability to work in a society. However, the fascist’s use of capitalist ideas of ownership would put a strain on the relationship between the leadership and the population. Overall, the economic ideals of Marxism are more practical in a society of today in which the under class greatly out numbers the ruling …show more content…
Communist “regard equality as a fundamental value and, in particular, endorse social equality.” (Haywood 104). Fascist however, “Believe that humankind is marked by radical inequality, both between leaders and followers and between the various nations or races of the world” (Haywood 104). The history of Fascism is marked by violent genocides and racial discrimination. In order to have a society thrive the people of the nation need to feel secure and that they are equal with one another. With this in mind, the ideals of Fascism do not allow for the spread of a regime to other areas without the treat of war and the deaths of the people of the area. Marxist societies are open to other idea and do not discriminate against you if you do not share their ideals. These views on the equality of all human beings allow for Marxist expansion and may encourage the social revolution needed to create a society with this type of political