Authors, Alan Taylor and Benito Mussolini, both wrote essays regarding the political culture during a specific time period. For instance, Alan Taylor wrote an article of the American nation post-revolutionary time in Ontario, Canada which examined the political institutions and economic policies implemented to avert another Revolution. Likewise, the article written by Benito Mussolini in 1932 defines the political ideology Fascism. The examination of both authors’ articles yields a sense of nationalism and political ideology.
In The Late Loyalist by Alan Taylor, the argument is about the movements was for naught because the people were still paying higher taxes than those given to them by Britain compared to other parts of Britain’s dominion such as Upper Canada currently Ontario-Quebec boundaries. Moreover, the focal topic of Taylor’s paper was to identify the gains/losses when comparing Upper Canada and the rebellious American; however, Britain learned lessons were put into practice in Upper Canada to preserve peace and order. Certainly, Parliament restricted the participation in politics and social discontent or outburst against the empire. Taylor identifies certain aspects of how Britain was going to lower the strength of the Americans and increase their strength in Canada. In the act of 1791, Parliament was to allow Americans to enter …show more content…
His emphasis of collectivism, rising people’s ethical values, and awareness of others rather than their own suffrage. Fascism was also encouraged violence rather than being a coward, a pacifist in the face of war. Thus, recognizing how dangerous can an authoritative ideological governmental system can be without limitations can bring great analysis through the lens of the historian to compare ideological system identifying flaws between each
In The Late Loyalist by Alan Taylor, the argument is about the movements was for naught because the people were still paying higher taxes than those given to them by Britain compared to other parts of Britain’s dominion such as Upper Canada currently Ontario-Quebec boundaries. Moreover, the focal topic of Taylor’s paper was to identify the gains/losses when comparing Upper Canada and the rebellious American; however, Britain learned lessons were put into practice in Upper Canada to preserve peace and order. Certainly, Parliament restricted the participation in politics and social discontent or outburst against the empire. Taylor identifies certain aspects of how Britain was going to lower the strength of the Americans and increase their strength in Canada. In the act of 1791, Parliament was to allow Americans to enter …show more content…
His emphasis of collectivism, rising people’s ethical values, and awareness of others rather than their own suffrage. Fascism was also encouraged violence rather than being a coward, a pacifist in the face of war. Thus, recognizing how dangerous can an authoritative ideological governmental system can be without limitations can bring great analysis through the lens of the historian to compare ideological system identifying flaws between each