A scientific theory is a type of theory used in the scientific method. The term theory can mean something different, depending on who you ask.Most people use the word 'theory' to mean an idea or hunch that someone has, but in science the word 'theory' refers to the way that we interpret facts.
Every scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A scientific hypothesis is a suggested ending for an unexplained thing that happened. According to the Dictionary, a hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence adds up to support a hypothesis, it moves up to a theory. In the scientific method and becomes accepted.
A scientific theory is a type of theory used in the scientific method. The term theory can mean something …show more content…
Facts and theories are two different things. In the scientific method, there is a obvious difference between facts, which can be observed and their theories,explanations and interpretations of the facts from scientist
A scientific theory is not the result of the scientific method, theories can be proven or turned down, like a hypotheses. Theories can be changed for the better if more information if found to benefit the correctness of the prediction overtime.
Theories is the foundation for exploring scientific knowledge and for putting the information gathered to work. Scientists use theories to develop inventions or find a cure for a disease.
Some think that theories become laws, but theories and laws have different roles in the scientific method. A law is observed by the natural world that is true every time it is tested. It doesn't explain why though, it just states that it is true. A theory explains observations that are found during the process.While law and theory are part of the scientific process, they are two very different roles and …show more content…
Every single definition agrees that a theory needs to be substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and estable. To break down,substantiated, is a theory that cannot be independent of past work and evidence, there needs to be some justification of it, within previous work in the field (other currently accepted theories) and in the sum of available evidence. For (b) is needs to actually explain something about the science it is in. The explanation covers causality. So, for example, the laws of thermodynamics are laws rather than theories because they describe rather than explain what happens. (c) and (d) are linked. A theory needs to make predictions that can be tested, so that the theory itself can, in principle, be rejected. And for the theory to be sound there needs to be a genuine commitment to reject the theory of the tests fail to support it. It isn't really a theory if, for example, there is either the intent or the logical possibility of interpreting evidence both ways. There is often a fifth criterion, which is essentially a coherence or elegance - does the theory "feel" right. This can include Occam's razor, ruling out excessively or unnecessarily complicated theories, which can easily be devised. Whether all of these are truly "essential" is probably a matter of debate, defining features of any category can be a problem, but together they describe the common characteristics
Every scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. A scientific hypothesis is a suggested ending for an unexplained thing that happened. According to the Dictionary, a hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence adds up to support a hypothesis, it moves up to a theory. In the scientific method and becomes accepted.
A scientific theory is a type of theory used in the scientific method. The term theory can mean something …show more content…
Facts and theories are two different things. In the scientific method, there is a obvious difference between facts, which can be observed and their theories,explanations and interpretations of the facts from scientist
A scientific theory is not the result of the scientific method, theories can be proven or turned down, like a hypotheses. Theories can be changed for the better if more information if found to benefit the correctness of the prediction overtime.
Theories is the foundation for exploring scientific knowledge and for putting the information gathered to work. Scientists use theories to develop inventions or find a cure for a disease.
Some think that theories become laws, but theories and laws have different roles in the scientific method. A law is observed by the natural world that is true every time it is tested. It doesn't explain why though, it just states that it is true. A theory explains observations that are found during the process.While law and theory are part of the scientific process, they are two very different roles and …show more content…
Every single definition agrees that a theory needs to be substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and estable. To break down,substantiated, is a theory that cannot be independent of past work and evidence, there needs to be some justification of it, within previous work in the field (other currently accepted theories) and in the sum of available evidence. For (b) is needs to actually explain something about the science it is in. The explanation covers causality. So, for example, the laws of thermodynamics are laws rather than theories because they describe rather than explain what happens. (c) and (d) are linked. A theory needs to make predictions that can be tested, so that the theory itself can, in principle, be rejected. And for the theory to be sound there needs to be a genuine commitment to reject the theory of the tests fail to support it. It isn't really a theory if, for example, there is either the intent or the logical possibility of interpreting evidence both ways. There is often a fifth criterion, which is essentially a coherence or elegance - does the theory "feel" right. This can include Occam's razor, ruling out excessively or unnecessarily complicated theories, which can easily be devised. Whether all of these are truly "essential" is probably a matter of debate, defining features of any category can be a problem, but together they describe the common characteristics