Richard Dawkins Memetic Ideas

Improved Essays
“The Selfish Gene:” a paradigmatic novel in which Richard Dawkins describes evolution in terms of the gene and ultimately depicts the fitness that is maximized by organismal beings on the genetic level. Similarly to the gene, Dawkins implements the term “meme” in his description of societal evolution regarding the spread of ideas throughout civilization. As stated by Scott Atran, a meme is “an element of culture that may be considered to be passed on by non-genetic means, especially imitation.” Memes begin as ideas and continue to spread when those ideas become communicable. Those concepts then continue to proliferate by eliciting thoughts in other human minds, thus causing those notions to flourish in the behavior they inspire. Similarly …show more content…
Dawkins’ ideology regarding the nature of ideas, for example, affects the philosophies of numerous theorists, three of whom are Kuhn, Popper, and Lakatos. Those philosophers provide distinctive theories as to how paradigms arise in science. Despite the differences in their ideologies, however, Kuhn, Popper, and Lakatos all demonstrate Dawkins’ memetic ideas. Kuhn, for example, crafted a systemic, three-step ideology consisting of “pre-science,” “normal” science, and revolutionary science. Kuhn’s ideology emphasizes acceptance of falsification: if an anomaly arises, it is the researcher’s fault, not the paradigm’s. Kuhn’s philosophy also concludes that prior paradigms are superseded during periods of crisis, which often create a bandwagon effect. Popper, however, employs a mentality of falsifiability in which one falsification nullifies an entire theory. Popper’s falsification analysis utilizes the belief that sciences can never be proven, only disproven. Popper also exemplifies an ideology in which organismal beings are goal-oriented with a principal regulator mechanism: in the case of humans, this control mechanism is the …show more content…
This system permits Lakatos to create a program in which anomalies are permitted and in which the program is broadminded enough to endure such irregularities. Lakatos also believes that any theory cannot be falsified until a superior theory comes along to replace it. Despite the individualistic demonstrations of Dawkins’ ideas in each philosopher, the interrelatedness of the three mentalities serves as perhaps the best exemplification of Dawkins’ perspective. Kuhn, Popper, and Lakatos present interconnected ideas, all of which build off of and are inspired by one another. This demonstrates the evolution of ideas and the variety of interpretations of ideas amongst individuals. As such, Dawkins’ ideas support the methods by which the three aforementioned philosophers envisioned scientific evolution. This can be further exemplified by the paradigm shift of transitioning from Newtonian to Einsteinian physics – one of the causal motivators of the three aforementioned philosophers. For centuries, Newtonian physics dominated the global perception of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In these cases, each new theory was built upon the negation of past ideas considered archaic, obsolete or deleterious to society and its constituents. Simply, theorists likewise scientists and scholars, always try to find the new breakthrough that betters past…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Darwinian Evolution is gone. Some may dispute it has changed. We can suspect that it has been changed in a drastic manner, and in a quite small period, so as to describe our modern-day understanding as a modification of Darwinian theory instead of an addition to it. Bawazer’s enthusiasm concerning human selection and engineering are remote from Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection. People-manufacturing genomes through a method of controlling the fitness of genes is sacrilegious by comparison.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Epilogue of An Elementary Christian Metaphysics by Owens, the author summarizes what was argued and discussed throughout the book. The crucial points that were discussed in this section include the definition of Metaphysics, Christian Metaphysics and how it contrasts to Christianity, as well as its status in science and the subject of Metaphysics. Overall, Owens provided a conclusion of his arguments that summarized what the Metaphysics course is about and how it is understood and determined. Metaphysics is a deep understanding of what a being is and how it relates to the universe, how it leads to the supernatural and explains how metaphysics is a science.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is the demarcation problem a philosophical pseudo-problem? For a long time in history, philosophers of science have dedicated to the construction of a boundary between science and pseudoscience. Despite the substantial efforts putting into the demarcation problem, none of those well-known demarcation criteria successfully classify science or pseudoscience. The failure to provide a universally accepted demarcation, or at least gain acceptance from a majority of the community, leads to two assumptions: the unique features shared by all sciences are not yet found; alternatively, there is no such criteria distinguish science and pseudoscience, therefore, resulting in the fact that the demarcation problem is likely to be a pseudo-problem from a philosophical point of view.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Mill 95). He mentions how it is common to have some confusion and uncertainty in areas like the sciences. He also mentions how in the sciences there are the first principles that are the basic start for all learning in the sciences. These principles are always held true in the…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carnap senses that only experience can tell us the knowledge imbedded in the world of phenomena (as described by Kant). In order to access the truth of this world, Carnap came up with a criteria of theory choice and demarcation which is required to evaluate competing scientific theories and deduct the ones that are better or worse. Here, Carnap introduced verificationism, to see if a principle is scientific or not. A theory is scientific if it is…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bermuda Triangle: Pseudoscience? Coined by philosopher, Karl Popper, ‘Pseudoscience’ is a term that is prevelant and used to describe theories or even fields of study that appear scientific but are not authentically so. Much like scientific claims or theories, pseudoscientific ideas also stem from curiosity of the humankind. They tend to use seemingly scientific jargon to rationalize concepts but are often scarcely refutable and are devoid of experimentation and evidence. This essay aims to bring out the flaws in pseudoscientific claims through the example of the Bermuda Triangle and demonstrate how and why this concept is not scientific. For many years together, the mysterious disappearance of ships, planes and even two nuclear submarines in and over the region popularly called the Bermuda Triangle (or the Devil’s Triangle) has fiddled with human curiosity and compelled our race to make repeated attempts at unravelling this mystery.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Dawkins is a well-known biologist and a writer who takes after Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin was the man who originally discovered the possibility of natural selection. Scott LaFee is a science writer who believes that Dawkin’s work proves that he is very similar to Charles Darwin. “Richard Dawkins, the 68-year-old English biologist and best-selling author, whose rousing defense and explanations of evolution have earned him international admiration, the enduring enmity of creationists and the nickname ‘Darwin 's Rottweiler.’” (LaFee).…

    • 2304 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is creationism science, pseudoscience, or non-science? Support your argument with an analysis of the distinction between science, pseudoscience, and non-science. Mainstream society is very familiar with the word “science” and that without a doubt science plays a detrimental role in our lives. However for many people there seems to be a discrepancy about the correct distinguishiment between science, pseudo-science and non-science. The aims of this essay are to establish the differences between science, pseudo-science and non-science, before then examining the appropriate categorization of “creationism science”.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance Of Knowledge

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    The natural sciences are very much paradigmatic in nature. As outlined by Thomas Kuhn, the natural sciences are revolutionary as opposed to “normal”; Kuhn argues that in “normal science”, scientific progress is limited to the scope of the current paradigm itself. Revolutionary science deals with paradigm shifts, in which there is a change in the basic assumptions of a scientific theory. Paradigmatic thinkers, however, are often disregarded and brushed off due to their dynamic views. For example, the earth was thought to be flat for was widely accepted until Pythagoras introduced a spherical model.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For one, Dawkins doesn’t rely on blind faith but rather what has been proven. He expressed how there was no God driving the evolution of all living things as proven by Darwin. Dawkins brought forward a form of comparison where he compared Evolution to a swerving driver. He said that if a car was werving you would think that an agent was controlling the car and in that case Lennox would be…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the roots of this perspective are positivist assumptions that science…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Paradigm Shift

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People may interpret Kuhn’s theory of paradigm as more assumption than concrete fact. In the article “Normal Science and the Extension of Theories,” the author makes clear that Kuhn was convinced that the paradigm is not necessarily the theory of the new idea, but simply a proposed direction toward the discovery and establishment of a new worldview that comes as a result of the shift in thought. As detailed on page 243 on the “Diffusion of Innovations”, Kuhn infers that scientific revolution occurs when big ideas are discussed and unusual ideas are proposed once the existing science is found to be flawed and cannot be fixed using the science accepted. When Aristotle had formulated his beliefs, it was based upon minimal experimentation and more observation of the physical reality. As he strictly believed the earth was at the center of the universe, the rest of his postulates followed quickly behind, depicting a specific view that would otherwise be false if sufficient evidence or explanation is not…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays