Atul Gawande Mistrust Of Science Summary

Improved Essays
“The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence. Furthermore,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For instance, she blames the challenges that result in misunderstandings and confusions of the public on matters of scientific developments to the difficulty that the scientific communities experience when finding appropriate terminology. In addition, the professor argues that the complex nature of modern science as another course of people’s misunderstanding of the advances being made in scientific fields. Question 3 In essence, Randall’s audience appears to share her warrants, owing to the fact that there is a significant level of misunderstanding of scientific developments. Therefore, the concerns raised by the author of the article are authentic, and they deserve to be addressed.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Influenza In the excerpt from his book “The Great Influenza” John M. Barry, characterizes scientific research as “grunt” and “tedious” work, highlighting that scientists must acquire courage to accept and embrace uncertainty. Barry develops his ideas by utilizing an extended metaphor comparing the unknown and the known, antithetical ideas of uncertainty and certainty, and rhetorical questions to mirror the thought process a scientists encounters. Using references from scientists Claude Bernard and Einstein, Barry bolsters his thesis by establishing ethos to emphasize that a scientist requires courage to “embrace-uncertainty.” Barry’s ostensible audience are scientists because he opens and closes the excerpt by directly addressing…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The traditions practiced has came with distrust to science but also a great achievement to humans by the technology it has created. Oscar Handlin explains that scientist are not always looked at as individuals that create technology. He goes on to say, “a deep underlying distrust of science runs through the accepted attitudes of people in the most advanced nations.” This distrust…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Science is not a body of facts. Science is a state of mind” (Angier 490). Both essays, “The Canon” by Natalie Angier and “Scientific Literacy and the Habit of Discourse” by Thomas W. Martin, discuss that science is not a set of facts to be learned, but is best practiced through actions. These two articles approach the topic differently by using different rhetorical modes and styles. Even though the article’s main points have similarities, the essays contain many differences through their rhetorical modes, approaches, and writing styles.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barry asserts that scientists exist at the “frontier” of discovery though “only the best among them move deep into the wilderness.” Barry furthers his analogy by highlighting precarious nature of scientific inquiry. He likens research to standing on the edge of a cliff. One step can send scientists into a “world that seems entirely different.” Another step could lead directly to failure.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Exploring the Unknown Science is one that is often thought of as a methodical process. Students are taught to follow a set group of rules to achieve a predictable result. But, once these students are actually engaged in the reality of the scientific world, they find out that scientific research is far more complex and adventurous expanding beyond this simple ruleset they are presented with They learn that science embraces the risk of being wrong and pushes its pursuer to explore knowledge that had previously never been explored. Scientists are expected to grasp knowledge that no one had ever before been presented with, making the field of scientific research one filled with risk and unpredictability. In the excerpt from The Great Influenza,…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public discussion is frequently a positive platform for opening discussion topics and easy worldwide access. However, in Merchants of Doubt authors Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway presents the dangers of relying on the public or popular platform. One of the major issues is the public platform is the number of people in the discussion only fuels to the argument, thus it takes longer to achieve their objectives. The other issue is the stakes and implications the debates have on policy. In general, Merchants of Doubt teaches readers it is important to understand the source of the issue versus what is being debated and to further examine the purpose behind each side.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Specter’s TED Talk “The Danger of Science Denial,” is an argument on why the scientific method is great and why it is an important part of the society. According to Specter, science has been the transformative force, which has remarkably improved the society in the last thousands of years. He argues that this happens to be the best time in society, in terms of mobility, wealth, health, and opportunities. However, science has been at the center of increased suffering for billions of societies across the world, with the rise of hunger. He argues that science has led to the degradation of land, which has then led to suffering for some parts of the society.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: The Danger of Science Denial It is important to appreciate the current nature and status of the world because there are individuals who laid the appropriate foundation for it. As Michael Specter’s TED Talk on The Danger of Science Denial, he outlined the challenges that might emanate from science denial. There are reasons that ought to be checked critically since they affect the current and future generation and they include health, wealth, mobility, opportunity and declining rates of diseases. It is critically clear that Specter did an excellent job that the audience can relate to, he did this by discussing emphatically on important issues that affect the current world.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is the demarcation problem a philosophical pseudo-problem? For a long time in history, philosophers of science have dedicated to the construction of a boundary between science and pseudoscience. Despite the substantial efforts putting into the demarcation problem, none of those well-known demarcation criteria successfully classify science or pseudoscience. The failure to provide a universally accepted demarcation, or at least gain acceptance from a majority of the community, leads to two assumptions: the unique features shared by all sciences are not yet found; alternatively, there is no such criteria distinguish science and pseudoscience, therefore, resulting in the fact that the demarcation problem is likely to be a pseudo-problem from a philosophical point of view.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the March 2015 issue of National Geographic, an article by Joel Achenbach entitled “The Age of Disbelief”, discusses the rise of climate change skepticism, explore the increasing polarization between cynics and advocates, and examines the what is causing reasonable people to distrust reasons. Achenbach, who is a staff writer for left leaning Washington Post and a monthly contributor for National Geographic, points out that the concept of climate change is born out of scientific methods which bear truths that are less than self-evident and can be hard to swallow. These are the same methods that Galileo use to proclaim that earth orbits around the sun and where Darwin proposed that we all evolved from a single celled organism, both of which vehemently opposed…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dexter Sommerfeldt Dr. Alexander Phil 366 11 December 2015 Vogel on the Refutation of Skepticism In the essay “The Refutation of Skepticism,” we see author Jonathon Vogel attempt to deny any skeptic claims about the external world. In its most simple form, his argument claims that to deny skepticism would be the best explanation of the material world. For slight background information, skepticism is the epistemological view that we simple lack the ability to have knowledge of a material world; the reasoning for this will be described later. First, defining Vogel’s complex argument is a necessity, then I will be providing a critical analysis of his essay as well as provide potential objections.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays