The article, “Does the Ribosome Challenge our Understanding of the RNA World?,” by Anthony Poole was published in the Journal of Molecular Evolution. RNA world hypothesis is a model framework explaining the origin of life on earth like genetically translated proteins and deoxynucleic acid from the point of view of ribonucleic acid based hypothetical systems. It suggests that ribonucleic acid existed before the deoxynucleic acid molecule.
Chemical and Darwin’s evolutionary theories attempt to explain the origin of life on Earth. Darwin's theory exemplifies the origin of species through natural selection; it is clear from these theories that complex life originated from a simpler form of life.
Translation is the process of making proteins from …show more content…
In fact, this was the main reason this article was written: to answer the challenges posed by Bowman and his colleagues in their article.
Cellular evolution shows the development of complex cells and organisms from simple cells. It shows the origin of life from simple cellular components, prokaryotes to more complex cells eukaryotes. However, in relation to this research concerning the RNA world hypothesis, the origin of life follows the same route, simple ribonucleic acid molecules to more complex form of life.
Bowman and his colleagues stated that ribosomes pose challenges to the RNA world hypothesis, especially when it is incorporated in dating back the establishment of an RNA world. The authors of this article are precise to refute this challenge by not consenting with Bowman and his colleagues’ idea because they argue out their idea without factoring in the Darwinian process of descent with biological modification and natural selection about refinement and evolution of ribosomal peptidyl transferase center (PTC). It is clear from the authors that uniting the perception of the origin of life on Earth to biological and chemical evolution paves a way in understanding Darwin's early evolutionary theory, which Bowman and his colleagues do not seem to
Chemical and Darwin’s evolutionary theories attempt to explain the origin of life on Earth. Darwin's theory exemplifies the origin of species through natural selection; it is clear from these theories that complex life originated from a simpler form of life.
Translation is the process of making proteins from …show more content…
In fact, this was the main reason this article was written: to answer the challenges posed by Bowman and his colleagues in their article.
Cellular evolution shows the development of complex cells and organisms from simple cells. It shows the origin of life from simple cellular components, prokaryotes to more complex cells eukaryotes. However, in relation to this research concerning the RNA world hypothesis, the origin of life follows the same route, simple ribonucleic acid molecules to more complex form of life.
Bowman and his colleagues stated that ribosomes pose challenges to the RNA world hypothesis, especially when it is incorporated in dating back the establishment of an RNA world. The authors of this article are precise to refute this challenge by not consenting with Bowman and his colleagues’ idea because they argue out their idea without factoring in the Darwinian process of descent with biological modification and natural selection about refinement and evolution of ribosomal peptidyl transferase center (PTC). It is clear from the authors that uniting the perception of the origin of life on Earth to biological and chemical evolution paves a way in understanding Darwin's early evolutionary theory, which Bowman and his colleagues do not seem to