Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Improved Essays
Show More
What is plea bargaining? To some individuals this is an easy way out for the criminals who have committed the crimes that they are charged for but all in all the criminal is receiving some type of punishment that gives a small glimpse into their future. May not be the sentence the families of the victim or victims, the prosecutor, or the public society were hoping for. Throughout this paper, I will be sharing some knowledge of Plea Bargaining.
Before the suspect is even offered the plea bargain, the pretrial has begun to hear the indictment and allow the defendant to enter a plea. Once, the defendant entered the plea the prosecutor has the power to decide if the case is worth prosecuting. Prosecutor will then decide on what the charges will be and at this point certain criteria needs to be met. The criteria that needs to be met is: They found a crime has been committed; the criminal can be identified; and there is enough evidence for a guilty charge. The prosecutor, who is the most powerful in the administration of justice, will meet with the defense attorney, defendant, and in some jurisdictions the judge, to come to an agreement on the sentence.
Defendants have the rights to hear their rights and options in a plea bargain. If …show more content…
Improved conviction rates, ability to concentrate on perplexed cases, avoiding the trial and delays, are some of the pros of plea bargaining. The cons of plea bargaining are: The defendant could feel the need to take the plea; results in a different and lesser sentence; and it may pressure the innocent to plead guilty. There are many more pros and cons of plea bargaining that in time they could change. Some judges and attorneys do think this plea has taken the rights away of the defendants to have a trial. The plea bargain is like everything else in this world, take it or leave it. You going to take it and hope for the best or leave it and go with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining In Alaska Case Study
    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea Bargaining In Alaska Case Study

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Pros And Cons
    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Pros And Cons

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Assembly Line Justice Case Analysis
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assembly Line Justice Case Analysis

    As criminology majors, we must learn the inner workings of the court system as well as the crucial courtroom players. We have all watched series such as Law and Order, CSI, American Crime, etc., but they give us a false sense of what an actual courtroom setup looks like. Unlike these shows, there are various steps that must be taken before the defendant is prosecuted. There is the arrest, initial appearance, bail is set, either a grand jury or preliminary hearing is conducted, arraignment occurs, along with all pre-trial motions being heard before trial, a trial is then started, a sentence is given, and sometimes the defendant appeals the charge. In contrast, assembly line justice cases end at the arraignment phase since the defendant accepts a plea deal.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Explain The Steps Following Arrest In The Court Process
    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain The Steps Following Arrest In The Court Process

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Plea Bargaining ought to be abolished in the United States criminal justice system. The reason for this is because it is unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral. Firstly, it is unconstitutional as it requires offenders to waive the rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th amendments: the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. Additionally, plea bargaining is unethical as it allows criminals to evade accepting responsibility for crimes they have committed.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process
    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Process

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examining Wrongful Convictions Chapter 10 Analysis
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examining Wrongful Convictions Chapter 10 Analysis

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Crack Cocaine Sentencing Report
    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Crack Cocaine Sentencing Report

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process
    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Process

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Plea Bargaining Effective
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Plea Bargaining Effective

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments Against Plea Bargains
    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Arguments Against Plea Bargains

    The advent of plea bargaining in the legal system in the past century has rendered the classic "trial" virtually obsolete. Plea bargaining1 is a crucial feature of our criminal justice system, as approximately 95% of convictions that occur within a year of arrest are obtained by a guilty plea. For at least a century, the institution of plea bargaining' has been a central feature of the American system of criminal justice. In September 203, the Justice Department again revised its guidelines regarding plea bargains. Lawyers and non-lawyers alike have generally assumed that the reason for this is the enormous size of the case load in relation to the available legal personnel.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance Of The Insanity Plea
    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of The Insanity Plea

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights
    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Police Discretion Case Study
    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Police Discretion Case Study

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Court Process Analysis
    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal Court Process Analysis

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings