What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why? If I were a prosecutor in this case I would asked if peter could be place in the CBCF correctional
…show more content…
The defense attorneys are known as the equalizers in the bargaining process. Regardless of what Pete want they have to make sure that it all with in the best for the client
As Sneaky Pete’s defense attorney, what would you suggest as a possible plea bargain to resolve the case against him? If I were Sneaky Pete’s attorney I would also offer a program that would help Pete and keep him off the street and help him learn the importance of having and education and having some kind of life skill to make it in the world today. He never had the right guidance by his mother or father so maybe by giving him the right guidance can influence him a lot to changes his ways. I would also offer the CBCF because it teaches him all the skill need to be a man on his own.
Chris, why should I take a risk on this guy by not sending him to prison? Should I take a risk on Sneaky and agree to probation? Chris needs to make sure that he addresses the reason why Pete should not go prison. I would address the fact that he has never had anyone around to help him go down the right path. All he knew was staying in trouble because his dad or mom wasn’t around to discipline him when he needs to be discipline. Chris needs to push for probation but he should push even harder for me to get in the CBCF program and not on …show more content…
The judges have many roles to for filed they are ones that interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearing and trial unfold in the courtroom. Most impotent role that the judges have is making the imperial decision maker in the pursuit of justice.
Based on the role as judge, would you have suggestions to both counsels on a plea resolution in the case?
I would suggestion what I through might be best for Pete going to prison might not be the best thing for him. He will be able to and education but will he get the right guidance. I think putting him in The CBCF program with kids that are his age and where they will help him under the value of life and also work with him to get and education.
As judge, do you perceive risks in granting probation to Pete?
Yes there are many reason why I wouldn’t granted Pete probation because he has an addiction and a habit he will go right back on the streets and do the same thing that landed him where he is at now. I would say probation is not a good option for
The defense attorneys are known as the equalizers in the bargaining process. Regardless of what Pete want they have to make sure that it all with in the best for the client
As Sneaky Pete’s defense attorney, what would you suggest as a possible plea bargain to resolve the case against him? If I were Sneaky Pete’s attorney I would also offer a program that would help Pete and keep him off the street and help him learn the importance of having and education and having some kind of life skill to make it in the world today. He never had the right guidance by his mother or father so maybe by giving him the right guidance can influence him a lot to changes his ways. I would also offer the CBCF because it teaches him all the skill need to be a man on his own.
Chris, why should I take a risk on this guy by not sending him to prison? Should I take a risk on Sneaky and agree to probation? Chris needs to make sure that he addresses the reason why Pete should not go prison. I would address the fact that he has never had anyone around to help him go down the right path. All he knew was staying in trouble because his dad or mom wasn’t around to discipline him when he needs to be discipline. Chris needs to push for probation but he should push even harder for me to get in the CBCF program and not on …show more content…
The judges have many roles to for filed they are ones that interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearing and trial unfold in the courtroom. Most impotent role that the judges have is making the imperial decision maker in the pursuit of justice.
Based on the role as judge, would you have suggestions to both counsels on a plea resolution in the case?
I would suggestion what I through might be best for Pete going to prison might not be the best thing for him. He will be able to and education but will he get the right guidance. I think putting him in The CBCF program with kids that are his age and where they will help him under the value of life and also work with him to get and education.
As judge, do you perceive risks in granting probation to Pete?
Yes there are many reason why I wouldn’t granted Pete probation because he has an addiction and a habit he will go right back on the streets and do the same thing that landed him where he is at now. I would say probation is not a good option for