Promissory Estoppel Research Paper

Improved Essays
This essay will define promissory estoppel within English Law. Promissory Estoppel is defined within English Law as a principle of justice, and can also be referred to in earlier cases as ‘equitable estoppel’ . This means that a promise made can be enforceable by law, even if there hasn’t been a formal consideration, meaning that it is a legally binding contract. Promissory Estoppel falls under contract law and has enabled legal obligations, meaning a person who has entered in to a contract cannot go back on a promise to another party even if there hasn’t been any consideration. The saying that “promissory estoppel may be used as a shield and not a sword” originated from the case of Combe V Combe, meaning that it could be used as a defence mechanism. A sword is defined as a weapon, as something that can be used to strike another person, although promissory estoppel is only used to protect the person and for it not to be used as a weapon. This was originally used in the case of Hughes V Metropolitan Railway co [1876-1877] but was then not used for some time until Lord Denning used it again in the Central Property Trust Ltd V High Trees Houses Ltd case in the 19th century.
Lord Denning lead the implementation
…show more content…
The rule in common law is that if there has been a promise that has already been made along with a pre-existing legal relation, it cannot be enforceable without the consideration of the other party. This is demonstrated in the case of Pinnel, where Lord Coke had demanded that there needed to be a payment from the debtor to the creditor. The defendant owed a sum of money, but did not pay the full balance, despite promising too, this meant the creditor can sue the debtor for the outstanding balance, as the case of Combe V Combe shows due to their not being consideration when originally making the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The crux of this case hinges on the construction of the provision of the HCGPP that, between 2007 and the spring of 2013, provided: A Police Services Supervisor I who is called in to work hours which are not contiguous to their regular shift shall receive a minimum of 4 hours pay at the overtime rate. The HCGPP is promulgated and revised by the Personnel Officer and enacted upon a vote of the County Council pursuant to Article VII, § 706 of the Howard County Charter. Although the HCGPP is a hybrid between a local government ordinance and an administrative regulation, “[w]hen we construe an agency’s rule or regulation, ‘the principles governing our interpretation of a statute apply.’” Hranicka v. Chesapeake Surgical, Ltd., 443 Md. 289, 298 (2015) (quoting Christopher, supra, 381 Md. at 209). Accordingly, as we set out to construe the HCGPP, our analysis begins by…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The general rule says, company has approved or endorsed an act or contract that has been done or made except prior authorization. (PRBL Week 5 2015) As Karen and Jones were two legal directors so they were legal authority by law to take decisions. They thought it would be a good expansion opportunity for Delish and took the loan.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay # 1 – Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. In this essay, I argue against Cardoza’s ruling in the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. I disagree that the original judgment finding the Railroad Company negligent should have be overturned. I begin with a summary of the case.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay about the case of Baig v Harvie [2015]. The case concerns an appeal from a man who was previously convicted under section 38 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 for abusive and threatening behaviour directed towards two parking attendants. The appellant’s appeal centres on the fact that his improper conduct was only verbal and that he had not been proven to have caused fear or alarm to the attendants. This essay will explain the terms of section 38, how they apply to the facts of this case and discuss some issues with the defence laid out in Subsection 2. It will also critique the defences provided by Baig and explain why the decision was correctly upheld.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Collateral Estoppel Case

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prior to a foreclosure sale, “a party to the lien instrument . . . may file in [a foreclosure] action a motion to stay the sale of the property and dismiss the foreclosure action.” Md. Rule 14-211(a)(1) ; Thomas, supra, 427 Md. at 444 n.5.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    here are two recognised standards of proof in Scots law. The first is beyond reasonable doubt, which is usually in criminal cases. The second is on the balance of probabilities which arises mostly in the civil context. This would suggest that the law on the standard of proof is straightforward. However ambiguity arises in the argument that there is or that there should be a third standard.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charters (or Bills) of Rights and Judicial Review are twinned and often inseparable in the academic controversy surrounding their use and implementation. In Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends, Waluchow attempts to defeat critics of Charters and Judicial Review by reframing the desirability of the two concepts in a manner that he argues is compatible with modern democracy. While a broad spectrum of previous conceptions of Charters fail to overcome the arguments set against them by the group Waluchow terms ‘the Critics’, he claims that his argument offers a fresh view of the Charter ― the jumping off point from which he aims to make his defence . He then begins to lay the footwork for his new conception of Charters, covering four…

    • 1773 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated bibliography Name: An Vinh Nguyen Tutor and tutorial time: How does Double Indemnity represent gender? This annotated bibliography showcases a brief account of my further research on gender representation, one of the most unique features of film noir in Double Indemnity. Angryanchovie's viewpoint quite one-sided since it pays too much attention to masculinity.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuanced Consent Theory

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order for a state to derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, all individuals within the state must be able to give their consent, willingly and autonomously, knowing that to do so, is to incur certain political obligations to said state. They must also understand that in doing so, they also authorise certain actions of the state towards them. In the case of consenting to the UK state, these obligations are mostly in the form of an agreement to obey the law, and the acceptance of any sanctions/punishments the state may consider fit. This essay will argue that the UK cannot derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, as there is no way for the governed to truly give their consent to be obligated to the state.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is irrefutable that, to a considerable extent, legal and non-legal actions are effective in administering justice for consumers. Consumer law has continually evolved in order to maintain its ability to protect consumers within the ever-changing modern marketplace - progressing from the common law notion of caveat emptor to an intensive legal framework recognising the fundamental need for consumer protections. While much of this contemporary framework - comprised of statutory bodies, law courts and tribunals, and working in conjunction with a myriad of other non-legal avenues - is highly effective in its delivery of justice, there remain areas of concern currently inadequate in safeguarding rights. Thus, although legal and non-legal measures…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Albion's Fatal Flaws

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Douglas Hay in his chapter “Property, Authority and the Criminal Law” was arguing that the criminal law system during the eighteenth century made it possible to govern England without the use of a police force or large army. In contrast to this argument is John Langbein’s argument in his article “Albion’s Fatal Flaws.” Langbein argued that the criminal law and its procedures existed to serve and protect the interests of those who were victims of crime – a group that was largely non-elite. Of these two arguments I believe Hay’s argument holds more weight and is more convincing. Langbein’s article is in response to the first chapter only of Hay’s book Albion’s Fatal Tree.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this reflection paper, I will be discussing the R v Jobidon case. In this case, the specific issue from the judgement I would like to address is the issue whether consent can be read out of the offence of criminal assault. According to section 265 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code, assault is defined as the intentional application of force to another person “without the consent of [the other] person.” This reflection paper will first acknowledge implications of statutory interpretation of common law, instead of the Criminal Code.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The defendant original wanted to sell a farm for £1000; however the claimant made a counter offer of £950. The Counter offer was not accepted so the claimant subsequently tried to accept the original offer. The defendant then refused to honour the original offer. The claimant bought an action of specific performance against the defendant, but was unsuccessful because as soon as a counter offer is made this immediately voids the original offer in its entirety (Duxbury 2011) and the offerer is not bound by the original offer. Nevertheless due to differentiation of interpretation of language and conduct, both potential outcomes must be analysed and then assessed which course of action would be most…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays