Essay On Tort Law

Improved Essays
A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to.
There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.
The first element is known as the “duty of care.” A duty of care arises when the law recognizes a relationship between two parties, and in this relationship, one party has a legal obligation to act in a certain manner toward the other. The second element is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by not exercising reasonable care in fulfilling the duty. The third element is causation. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two typed components of legal causation which are the actual cause and proximate cause. Actual cause exists when but for the breach of the duty of care, the injured person would not have suffered an injury. Proximate cause exists when the type and extent of the injured person’s injuries were reasonably related to the breach of the duty of care. The fourth element is injury. The injured person must have suffered an injury that can be remedied by money damages, which is the legal term for monetary compensation.
…show more content…
Negligence is conduct by an individual that drops below a reasonable standard of care and causes harm to another person. An individual has a duty to act reasonably when interacting with others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others, that individual is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay # 1 – Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. In this essay, I argue against Cardoza’s ruling in the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. I disagree that the original judgment finding the Railroad Company negligent should have be overturned. I begin with a summary of the case.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ii. 9. 20 Injured citizens of Eugene, NM a. Claims Against: i. Vs. City Of Eugene 1. Rule: Negligence a. Rule Definition: When a reasonable person fails to do their duty to take a certain standard of care in their circumstances.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Susie V. Tommy Negligence To prove negligence, the defendant must owe a duty to the plaintiff, that duty must be breached, and the defendant’s actions or inactions were the cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Duty Duty is the legal obligation required of an individual to act as a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances. Drivers are required to act with reasonable care when encountering other vehicles and pedestrians. Tommy was the driver of the vehicle and Susie was a pedestrian.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Second, condition the defendant failed to act a certain way. Third, the defendant must have breached that duty and it must have been actual and the cause for the plaintiff’s injury. Fourth, the breach must have caused harm or injury which the court can award damages. Analysis: Brian a owner of a delivery business is dropping off some…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pbins 401 Assignment

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term negligence would apply in a situation where someone did not use the level of care or skills that another would ordinarily have used in a similar situation (Phillips, 2013). Alternatively, malpractice is considered the “careless performance of duty” and requires that the expected delivery of a level of care equal to educational capability, a deviation from that training occurred and someone was directly harmed by the action or inaction which was incongruent with training received to perform the duty (Phillips, 2013, p. 39). Moral Principles in Decision Making A way to guide our ethical practice is essential.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that your insurance company must cover your medical expense and lost income even when the other person is at fault. The only way the other driver may have to pay for the costs is if there is a serious injury. To meet this requirement, you would have to have significant scarring, permanent injuries or disfigurements. Since these descriptions are fairly vague, the courts would have to figure out if your injuries fit the “serious injury” threshold.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law (10th ed. 2005) Torts, § 835, p. 52.) A person cannot hold another liable if he or she injures themselves or another if they are “actively careless.” It is expected if a person does not use “ordinary care” while involving themselves in an activity they should anticipate the possibility of future harm. Another form of duty of care is known as an “affirmative duty.”…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group of ideas are designed to change an underlying liability rules in the civil justice system, tort reform. Tort reform often alters the cultural aspect of civil litigations and makes it difficult for the plaintiffs’ to do the following: a) whom to file the case against, b) filing a lawsuit, c) obtaining an enormous amount of money for their suffrage, and etc (Daniels & Martin, 2000). Even though, tort reform makes it difficult for the injured person to sue a company, expecting millions of dollars for every claim is ridiculous. Ramseyer and Rasmusen (2010) mentioned about McDonald’s Coffee incident when Ms. Liebeck received $2.86 million for a coffee spill. If McDonald’s keeps satisfying every injured person with the money they demand, their business will be penniless.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Intentional torts are when an individual purposely commits a wrong act. Negligence is the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm done to an individual. There are four attributes to negligence which would be duty owed, breach of duty, proximate cause and harm done to an individual. Foreseeability plays an important factor in an individual being prosecuted for negligence because that’s ones’ judgment of what is likely to happen.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence is one theory. Negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care to keep you from having an accident. Negligence cases result when someone's inaction or action causes the injury. The other theory is liability. This legal theory is when a product you have used caused the injury.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction In order to establish criminal liability, the actus reus must generally be proved. The actus reus of an offence are comprised with the prohibited conduct, the relevant circumstances, the consequence and causation. Causation is one of the four elements of actus reus. Causation in the criminal context is concerned with the legal attribution of criminal responsibility for consequences.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays