Probable Cause

Improved Essays
The Fourth Amendment was put into place to protect the rights of the American people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. Constitution specifically states “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…” (U.S. Constitution – Amendment 4). Additional, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that some searches and seizures may be classified as constitutional based on reasonable suspicion and not justified as probable cause. (Lushbaugh, C. A. and Weston, P. B. (2012) Probable cause is a discretionary law that is left up to the officer to determine if he/she has adequate information to entertain probable cause. This action much be established before a search, seizure, arrest and(or) warrant can take place. In the case of Brinegar v. United States 338 U.S. 160 (1949), where Brinegar challenged the legality of his conviction. An officer recognized him as he traveled on the highway and noticed that his vehicle was heavily overloaded. Upon approaching the vehicle, the …show more content…
For example, if a person is suspected of committing a murder, an officer has the right to stop and frisk the suspect to determine if he/she has any weapons. However, a person that is in a known drug area, but a connection cannot be established (e.g. physical signs of drug use) an officer does not have grounds for reasonable suspicion. The officer must be able to provide specific evidence to warrant an incriminating character. American citizens are protected under the U.S. Constitution against unlawful detainment and unlawful searches of their property. Therefore, it is important for officers to uphold the law with the upmost respect and apply the correct legal standards to every situation based on facts and circumstances. Probable cause and reasonable suspicion both are left to the rationalization of the officer and should be conducted with compos mentis and unbiased

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This can be considered as an exigent circumstance which is when officers immediately take action in order to make an arrest. In Brigham City, Utah v Charles Stuart, the court believed that under exigent circumstances, police should be allowed to enter a suspect’s home without a warrant. This established imminent danger as one of these circumstances. In Wilson v Arkansas, the knock and announce rule was used because the plantiff’s home was searched without letting him know it was the police. From then on, it is a requirement for police to do this with exceptions from Taylor.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp Exclusionary Rule

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a police officer suspected a criminal of violating the law, the officer had the right to search the suspect without any warrant. Moreover, Mapp v. Ohio limited what police can do to a citizen. For example, a police can’t search another person without any “reasonable suspicion” or “probable cause”. Furthermore, Chief Justice Warren introduced a new rule: inevitable discovery rule.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lawful arrest Lawful arrest does not require a search warrant when arresting someone. The officer can search the person and any area surrounding the person. The police search the surrounding are for evidence that could be throw or destroyed within the suspect wingspan. The lawful arrest is also helps when searching a vehicle, when the suspect is arrested. The Supreme Court can let a police officer search a vehicle if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the vehicle has weapons or drugs that belongs to the suspects.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unreasonable search and seizures is an issue where each side, the citizens and the law (police) want protection, what's right and to be heard, but their reasons are divided and desired outcomes are generally…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially the Court was in agreement that the stop and subsequent arrest in the Terry case was appropriate on the basis of the “probable cause” standard. Barrett (1998) states, Chief Justice Warren had initially approached this decision on the basis that the stop in the Terry case was appropriate. It was Justice Brennan who eventually persuaded Chief Justice Warren to render a decision which put forth the new “reasonable suspicion” standard (Barrett, 1998, 793-821). If Chief Justice Warren had maintained his original inclination of rendering a decision which clearly delineated the standards that a police officer must follow before a search is conducted there would be no controversy over this issue. However, had this actually occurred then…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the court reiterated that there is a common law rule governing police powers of the detention must be viewed as reasonable necessary of the circumstances , informing the officer's suspicion that there is a clear Nexus between the individual to be detained and recent or on-going criminal offences . Reasonable grounds figure at the front-end of such as assessment underlying the officers reasonable suspicion that the particular individual is implicated in the criminal activity under investigation. The supreme court preferred the phrase "reasonable grounds to detain " rather than the phrase " Articulable cause " .…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What´s Probable Cause?

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The basic requirements for obtaining search warrants begin with probable cause. Probable Cause is the level of suspicion that must be reached under the Fourth Amendment in order to issue a search warrant (Hall, 2014). Probable cause can be based on an officers training, experience, and the totality of the circumstances. Totality of the circumstances can include statements, observations, and evidence, which can include hearsay (Hall, 2014). Probable cause is a higher suspicion than reasonable suspicion and is a level that would cause a reasonable and prudent person to believe that a crime has been, is being, or is going to be committed and the person(s) in question is responsible for the crime.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Probable Cause

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasonable doubt is enough to legitimize brief stops and detainment, however insufficient to legitimize a full search. It is important to know the difference of these when being stopped by the police. Police Stopping Vehicles According to Harris (1993) police can stop vehicles based on probable cause because there is an act that breaks a certain law, which ultimately gives an…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Officers Daily are faced with the balancing act of up holding the Fourth Amendment rights of individual people and protecting and upholding the law. Officers must know when they can can stop and question someone, conduct a search, who can authorize a search. Police also have to know when they are allowed to arrest someone. Simultaneously, police must know when to uphold the law and keep suspect rights intact. The most important, is for an officer to uphold a persons Fourth Amendment Rights, which gives people the right to be safe and secure in their home and are protected from unreasonable search and seizures.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Definitions 1. Plain view is a legal term that describes the ready visibility of objects that might be seized as evidence during a search by police in the absence of a search warrant specifying the seizure of those objects. To lawfully seize evidence in plain view, officers must have a legal right to be in the viewing area and must have cause to believe that the evidence is somehow associated with criminal activity pg. 205 2. Terry Stop is a brief detention of a person by police on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity but short of probable cause to arrest.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consent to search and seizure should be granted in a household in which two persons share a computer but use different login names and passwords when both parties are present and both most give consent otherwise officers can only search the consenting persons portion of the computer. If the one person is present and the other person isn’t the only way the person who is home has authority to consent to a search of the whole computer is by providing passwords for both users. It is recommended that you get consent in writing and make sure the individual understands the scope of consent as a layman would. Also, be very specific and detailed in the request for consent (Knetzger, 2008). Defendants may claim that the person who granted consent to search and seizure did not have the authority to do so.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This short essay details how to speak to law enforcement officers in the scenario of a traffic stop, in an effort to protect and preserve civil rights granted by the Constitution. Violating the stipulations placed by the Forefathers outlined in our Bill of Rights undermines the values the United States was built on. Disregarding, ignoring or never learning about the laws that defend the people against mistreatment in the United States is how tyrannical figures dissolve them without reproach. Protecting Civil Rights Special interests will always conflict the good of humanity. For that reason, it is in the best interest for everyone to keep their safeguards well-kept against any tyrant of law.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasonable suspicion protects the suspects, while it allows the police to do their job the right way. In orders to balance the power of the police with the rights of suspect, PACE was introduce as guideline. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 states that the police can search an individual at a “place to which at the time when he proposes to exercise the power the public or any section of the public has access, on payment or otherwise, as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission”. However, reasonable grounds for suspicions depend on the conditions of each case at the time of the search. Police officers have high level of authority over the public, which gives them the right to stop and search any individual.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays