Plato's 'The Ring Of Gyges'

Improved Essays
Plato’s “The Ring of Gyges” tells the story of a shepherd named Gyges who came upon a mystical gold ring when an earthquake split up the ground and revealed a dead body wearing that ring. He found out that it could turn him invisible when worn in a certain manner and used it to seduce the queen, kill the king, and take over the kingdom. Then, Plato explains that if a righteous man and an unrighteous one both had such rings, the righteous man would be compelled to also do unrightful things for his advantage and if such a person did not do that, he or she would be both commended and ridiculed by society.
If I possessed a magic ring that could turn me invisible, I surely would act differently in some aspects of my life, but I would still stick
…show more content…
Other people who have the amount of courage I wish I had would do whatever they want to do. They would steal what they want and need since it is in our human nature to want to rebel against something. It gives us the adrenaline rush we all like to experience at a lower cost since no one would be able to accuse an unseeable person – a ghost, a non-existent person – for stealing, or anything for that matter. There would not be any evidence that could prove they are guilty. Therefore, there is no longer any reason to act legally, morally, or justly, except for their own conscience. They would know whether what they are doing is right or wrong, and they have to battle with that before they can act against their conscience. This inner voice is what is standing in their way. Some people have the ability to cope with themselves after doing something against their principles while some do not. There is also the thought that their action could hurt others in the process. This also comes into factor when they consider and calculate whether their wants and needs are of greater importance to them than others’ well-being. If they think their benefit is greater than others’ losses, they will do what they plan to do, and if they can live with themselves knowing they have done wrong and give away their sense of integrity, then there is nothing else that is keeping them from doing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I wish people then and now possessed more dignity than to stoop so low as to steal from others. What is so terrible about asking for permission from the person who first obtains the certain item? Then if the answer is negative, people should be willing to accept it. The idea about cognitive dissonance also infuriates me. People ought to be willing to face the consequences of their wrongdoing.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Study Guide, Midterm Exam PH 480 A Fall 2016 Seven potential essay questions—choose any four (4) to complete: 1) What is the Ring of Gyges? Why does Glaucon bring it up in his conversation with Socrates about justice? What does he think we are led to believe by thinking about the story of the ring, and how does Socrates argue against this?…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will argue that in Plato’s Republic, Socrates shows the Ring of Gyges teaches us that morality would disappear if there were no consequences to the actions taken by the one who possessed the ring. First, I will explain what he means by morality would disappear. Then I will show why I feel morality would not disappear. Finally, I will conclude that morality will not disappear.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They did not care that what they were doing was harming others and would lead to their ultimate demise. The status they could reach by performing these unethical actions far out weighed the morality of their…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Looking back on how people thought they had to do things are so upsetting and makes individuals wonder, what made them come to conclusion to make the actions they did? Why betray the…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pleasure can come from stealing if someone has a psychological issue, like kleptomania. (Psychological studies on shoplifters, shoplifting and kleptomania. 2014.) A sociological issue can also explain why these three men succumbed to stealing from people’s homes. Psychological explanations for becoming unethical is less common, while sociological explanations for unethical behaviors are more common. If people have been raised to think stealing things because you need it or because it is there and easy to grab is “fine” then they are going to grow up doing the same thing.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nobody’s an impeccable being, so of course eventually everyone will commit a wrongdoing. I think people are generally good-natured and the reason for their complicity is due to their short sighted nature. They fail to consider outcomes and…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One with good character will do the right thing even when nobody's watching. The reason for doing their actions is because it is simply the right to do. There are many important decisions that people face day to day. Before making a decision it is important to think about the long lasting effects and the pros and cons. Examples of decisions that I made was to choose to do push myself harder in school by taking high school courses in middle such as Earth Science and Algebra 1.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Deterrence Theory

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They don’t care if they get caught or killed because they believe they are doing it for a higher power. Next lets see how the social learning theories apply. Social Learning theory states, “People develop motivation to commit crime and the skills to commit crime through the people they associate with.” (Barkan,…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But these actions are ones that individuals ought to do for the good of everyone; although one is degrading their integrity, they are upholding outcomes that are necessary for the good. On the other hand, not acting against moral beliefs can produce negative consequences that one is responsible for that erodes personal integrity. In Williams’ example of George not wanting to accept his job offer to work for chemical and biological warfare research to support his family, George choosing his morality maintains his integrity, but does not produce a consequence of good for his family or for someone who will receive the job with higher aspirations in the field (664). In a utilitarian response, it would require George to take the job. But based on Williams’ claims, he should not because the moral implications of working a job would degrade his integrity by essentially aiding in the killing of numerous people (664-665).…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At that point the righteous may risk their own wellbeing to oppose or help the other escape injustice. This idea of righteousness of what your society or your religion dictates is right which defines half of what the notion of justice means. The other half is morality. “The Selling of Joseph” Samuel Sewall wrote: “And yet ‘tis to be feared, we have no other title to our Nigers. “These Ethiopians, as black as they are; seeing they are the Sons and Daughters of Fist Adam, the Brethren and Sister of the Last Adam, and the Offspring of GOD; They ought to be treated with respect agreeable” (Sewall 4).…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics