Lon Luvois Fuller was a legal philosopher, he was born in June 15, 1902, Hereford, Texas, United States and died in April 8, 1978, Munich, Bavaria, Germany. He supported the view of morality, and argued inside of that. His book The Morality of Law, 1964, is one of his great creations where he elaboratly explaind about morality of law, spacially the internal morality of law. He is consider as a philosopher of contemporary natural school of law, though he rejecte1. Theory :
A. The Two Moralities :
The moralities of duty and the morality of aspiration, are the two moralities fuller did talk about in his The Morality of Law book. To explain the relation between law and morality fuller said about these set "one set contains the 'morality of aspiration' …show more content…
Failure to achieve any rules at all
2. Failure to publicize rules expected to observe. 3. abuse of retroactive legislation: doesn’t allow guide and also undercuts prospective rules since it threatens to change them 4. Failure to make rules understandable
5. Enactment of contradictory rules
6. Rules that require conduct beyond the powers of the affected party
7. Introducing too many and frequent changes in rules that subject cannot orient his action by them
8. Failure of congruence between rules as announced and their actual administration." 13 failure in only one of these eight points, results in, not just a bad legal system but not a legal system at all.
Aspiration toward Perfection in legality :
So far we got eight routes to fail to establish a legal system, so these are the eight legal excellence by obtaining them the legal system can excist as fuller said, and it is the utopia in words of fuller. But obtaining the perfection is far more complex. These eight standerd is the objects of gaining only legality of a legal system not perfection. So inner morality of law starts from the bottom point of morality of duty and goes till morality of aspiration. And obtaining morality of aspiration can lead perfection in
A. The Two Moralities :
The moralities of duty and the morality of aspiration, are the two moralities fuller did talk about in his The Morality of Law book. To explain the relation between law and morality fuller said about these set "one set contains the 'morality of aspiration' …show more content…
Failure to achieve any rules at all
2. Failure to publicize rules expected to observe. 3. abuse of retroactive legislation: doesn’t allow guide and also undercuts prospective rules since it threatens to change them 4. Failure to make rules understandable
5. Enactment of contradictory rules
6. Rules that require conduct beyond the powers of the affected party
7. Introducing too many and frequent changes in rules that subject cannot orient his action by them
8. Failure of congruence between rules as announced and their actual administration." 13 failure in only one of these eight points, results in, not just a bad legal system but not a legal system at all.
Aspiration toward Perfection in legality :
So far we got eight routes to fail to establish a legal system, so these are the eight legal excellence by obtaining them the legal system can excist as fuller said, and it is the utopia in words of fuller. But obtaining the perfection is far more complex. These eight standerd is the objects of gaining only legality of a legal system not perfection. So inner morality of law starts from the bottom point of morality of duty and goes till morality of aspiration. And obtaining morality of aspiration can lead perfection in