Judicial Tyranny Review

Improved Essays
Judicial Tyranny Review

Name: Institution

Introduction
This books gives insights on the situation of judicial system of America. It enlightens on how the court system has become corrupt gradually since it was granted its mandate. The court has been used for personal matters and too much affiliated to politics. Robertson notes that, morals and libertinism has been corrupted by over use of power. Judicial system has surpassed its constitutional roles and rights and it has taken over other arms of the government. It is evident that, practice of the law has fringed the rights of American citizens. It has even enshrined its rules and powers into the church commanding its authority which is against Christianity belief and practices.
…show more content…
Federal and supreme courts have gradually acquired powers and radicalised the system of justice to suit their selfish gains. It is no longer liberal and people centered, but a threat to liberty of Americans, (Merril, T, 1985). It has grown powerful and has the audacity to perform its activities no matter how much unconstitutional they are. Its powers has become unrestricted because not even any arm of the government can hinder their functions. Right from its enactment, the judicial system became perverted to justice. It continuously grew out of control and started to radicalise other courts. The outcome has brought adverse effects to the government of America, ( Boudin, L, 1990).The form of government has been altered since judiciary has expanded its authority to other arm of the government. It has affiliations to the legislature and executive bodies of the government, it is not a solitary body as it was …show more content…
It has grown powerful at the same time uncontrollable. This unrestricted power has resulted to consequences that have been felt to date. The court system has become more hostile to religions especially Christianity. It has propelled the enactment of laws that very contrary to the beliefs and practices of Christianity. Robertson observes that, legalisation of gays is just too much for Christian religion. The church does not allow gay marriage and it is even an abomination to other religions. Despites this prior knowledge, the court system has prevailed in making sure gay is legal despite outcry from religious groups. It has played a role is supressing some church activities and beliefs hence it undermines freedom of religion. According to the constitution, the court has its limits in affairs concerning faith and religion. However, the judiciary has assumed some roles that contrary to the constitution. It has entrenched the church with policies and laws that are against the faith. Mark you, these laws have resulted into a corrupt society. The court has catapulted erosion of morals in the society due to the rules it passes, (Robertson, P, 2004). Society is more corrupt and immoral than it was before. Legalisation of same sex marriages has resulted to an era which does not regard marriage sacred as it was meant to be. Other laws that have been enacted include legalisation of abortion. This law is a contradiction to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison” (McBride). This case answered the question that the Courts do have the authority to interpret the Constitution and declare acts by Congress and the President unconstitutional. When laws are in contrary to the Constitution, it is the duty of the Courts to review and resolve the issues and apply a decision correct to the law. Lastly, the case set a precedence and brought forward with emphasis that the Constitution is the law of the land and the Supreme Court decision is the final arbiter of the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    b. Social Reform in Women’s Rights & Abortion Roe v. Wade, a case regarding a pregnant single woman, Roe, challenges the constitutionality of Texas criminal abortion laws, which would not perform abortions unless the pregnancy would put the mother’s life in risk or if medical advice is given to the mother to not carry out her pregnancy. The rulings of this case was 7-2 in favor of Roe, the court states that it was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th Amendment for Texas’ state abortion laws to only allow forth abortions only when the mother’s life is at stake(Roe v. Wade). The court ruled that women have the right of privacy when it came to deciding whether they should bear children. The court also decided that the woman’s health is in the interest of the state, that the woman can decide up to the second trimester whether or not to undergo an abortion, but when the third trimester start, the state has the right to preserve the fetus’ life unless…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Vs Dynamic Court

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dynamic v. Constrained Courts When it comes to the American court system, there are two predominant but opposing viewpoints: the constrained and the dynamic court views. While both views relate to the power the court system holds, the constrained view takes the stance that the court’s power is limited, while the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Schechter Cultry Case

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    U.S. Supreme Court Institutional Legitimacy It is rumored that in reaction to a ruling from the Supreme Court in 1832, President Andrew Jackson stated, “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!” This quote highlights a problem with the Supreme Court in which it can neither create nor enforce legislation. Because it has ”no influence over either the sword or the purse,” the Court must rely on its institutional legitimacy to ensure its rulings are respected (Hamilton 1788). There have been cases in which the Court has self-consciously preserved its institutional legitimacy and cases in which the Court went too far from the preferences of the other branches or public opinion that put its institutional legitimacy on the line.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The system of checks and balances of power in our political system is essential and judicial review is but one assurance that no single person or group can make a determination to override the Constitution. Members of the Supreme Court must police themselves from within through educated and powerful discussions. It is unlikely that a majority of the group would ever become despots, unchecked by the larger group. In all, there must be checks and balances in our system and the power of judicial review stands as a very critical aspect of this process, while maintaining the equitable balance of power between our branches of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the United States feared the development of an oppressive government. To counter this, the founding fathers developed a system of checks and balances that directly includes the people. The right to a jury trial has a central role in the American justice system that prevents unlawful acts from being continued. Thus, juries have a political significance outside the judicial branch. The jury system acts as a check on government power preventing government officials from making laws that are morally wrong.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I disagree with Hamilton’s description of the judiciary being the “least dangerous” and “weakest” branch. Although the courts themselves may not have the reach that the executive and legislative branches do, it still has its own place of significance by influencing the course of American history. Through the system of checks and balances, the judiciary has the power to overrule state legislators, congress, and even the president, with the authority to strike down laws. The courts have displayed their power of reach several times in the form of judgments. Such as, when it struck down a law that would protect slavery in the Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857, or when the courts thrust America into a time where segregation was to be an anomaly, with…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judicial Independence

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages

    To be responsible means to be answerable for something within one's power or control. The single most important aspect of our current system is the concept of judicial independence. Judicial independence is critical to the functioning of any democracy – as evidenced by its incorporation into the structure of our nation’s government established by the federal constitution. The concept of judicial independence is one of the key factors that distinguish our system of government from others around the world. It protects the weak from the powerful; the minority from the majority; the poor from the rich; yes, even the citizens from excesses of government.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers Separation of powers is a basic doctrine in modern democratic government. It originated from the writings of a French philosopher named Montesqieu who in 1748 published a book entitled “The Spirit of the Laws”. He introduced the idea that power of government were three of kinds: the legislative, the executive and the judicial power.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays