Mill Absolute Moral Rule

Improved Essays
The question for this both Kant and Mill focus on is: is there absolute moral rule? Kant and Mill provide different perspectives on this question. Kant is a believer in absolute moral rule, whereas Mill is not a believer in it as he believes there are exceptions to moral rule if it maximizes happiness. I agree with Mill, I do not think there is not absolute moral rules and to determine if something is right dependent on the consequences.
When coming up with this view, I based it on my own profession of teaching. Would it be ok for me to lie to a student if the consequences of lying are greater than those of lying. My first reaction tells me that lying is always wrong, but I can of a variety of examples in my life where I have lied to avoid
…show more content…
The United States Constitution is a very successful and organized document who’s original rules of government are generally followed, however there are amendments that have changed or altered those rules as well. Moral rule is no different, although we can make general moral rules such as: do not lie, do not cheat, and do not steal. There are certain exceptions to these rules that result in the greatest happiness overall. I like the example the text gave us about President Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb, although the bomb would kill many people it would also save many people. Killing innocent people is considered wrong but if it saves more people than it kills that results in greater “happiness” for a greater number of people. This is an example of a generally accepted moral rule having an exception. I think it begs the question of if being moral hurts more people than it helps is it actually moral? Morality to me is based on how can the greatest number of people achieve happiness, and for the most part I think the absolute moral rules accomplish this but there are also exceptions from those rules to achieve the same result. Therefore I agree with Mills’ that there are no absolute moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lying Is such an important part of life itself today, that it just seems like a normal thing to do all the time. Some people even lie when it isnt necessary because theyre so used to telling lies, it comes naturally. lying may definitely get u out of trouble and even save u from a few situations. Imagine someone commitied a murder. Would you believe theyre going to admit it ?…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s view on duty has to do with duty for the sake of the law but Mill’s view is that one duty is increasing happiness among large numbers of people. They both feel that a person has a duty to fulfill whether it is self-sufficient or because they are following rules. A similarity that follows both Aristotle and Mill is that they both founded their views on happiness even though they might disagree on their understanding of the subject. Aristotle vies happiness as an “end in itself”, whereas Mill sees happiness as both quality and quantity. Mill has many similarities with both Kant and Aristotle.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people will say that lying is never the answer, but they don’t always tell why. Lying often ends unethically, not only the can the lier be punished or feel guilty in the process, but it often goes further than anticipated. When looking back there seems to be more consequences on the result of the pretense than what the reward would have been if everything worked out and there was no lying. The Salem Witch Trials, the McCarthy Trials, and the McMartin Trials all proved that it is important to always be honest, regardless of the sacrifice.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The fact of comparison is the beginning and the persistence placed on the devotion of moral obligations Kant’s categorical imperative is indeed categorically imperative. Mill also has an outset of morality to be the responsibility of fulfilling one’s duty and succeeding following rules, but in a completely different logic. In the circumstance of Kant, duty must be done for duty’s sake, for Mill, duty must obey the happiness principle, preserving the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. In this approach of contrast, Aristotle varies due to him not viewing morality as duty for its own sake, or obedience of laws, for some idea of larger good, but in its place the protection of a balanced value controlling oneself between extremes. Aristotle values the fulfillment of the singular; both Kant and Mill are more apprehensive with the concentration of the…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. According to Ericsson, we all lie because we want to avoid confrontation, spare people’s feelings, and to get out of particular situations. To avoid confrontations, sometimes it is necessary to lie, for example, if you were talking about someone behind their back and they hear about it, you are going to deny that you ever talked bad about that person to avoid getting into an alteration. If someone is wearing an ugly outfit that they are real proud of, you are most likely going to lie to them by telling that someone that you love their outfit just to avoid hurting their feelings.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think Mill’s moral principle is more liked and easy to follow among most people. This is because people like the freedom to do what they please. Being told what to do is just going to cause…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consider the following situations. In the first, you are an educator at the local university. You hear there is a crazed man demanding to see one of your students. Upon hiding the student in the room, you tell the man that the student did not attend class today and you don’t know where he is. Conversely, you work for a large company in New York, and it is your secretary is leaving in a few days for maternity leave.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Lying Acceptable

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Lying Acceptable? You know your friend cheated on the state test, and you know if they fail the test her or his dad will beat them, what do you do? Simple you lie, lying can save people from dangerous situations or harm such as that one. Everyone lies, from kids to adults…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states, “if the greatest happiness of all is the end of human action, it must be the standard of morality.” (11) Opponents to this theory state that happiness is unattainable, and humans can do without it. Mill responds to this by clarifying that utilitarianism is not only the pursuit of happiness, but “the prevention of lessening happiness.” (11) Therefore, Mill concludes that utilitarianism is more necessary if happiness is unattainable.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality as used in the context is defined as the principles revolving around the differentiation between wrong and right behavior of the human. As the last thinker of the enlightenment, Kant was a philosopher that believed that reason was the only thing that morality can come from. In contrast Mill was a philosopher who believed that morality is utility, meaning that something is moral only if it brings happiness or pleasure. In looking at both Kant ’s…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honesty is the quality that many people look for in a person. Being honest brings upon positive and virtuous qualities in a person. Honesty in a most literal sense means not lying but it also includes being straightforward, sincere and trustworthy. William Shakespeare said, “No Legacy is so rich as honesty”, this is because honesty leaves lasting impressions on society and other individuals. Straightforwardness will make individuals not beat around the bush and be confident in their opinions.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays