Mens Rea Definition

Improved Essays
In the United States, citizens “can be found criminally responsible if he performs a prohibited act intentionally and with a statutorily specified mental state (which may span such things as ‘purpose’, ‘knowledge’, ‘recklessness’, or ‘negligence’)” (Mobbs et. al., 2007, p. 697). As such, the foundation for a diminished capacity defense is effectually divided by two important factors that establish the physical and mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime: actus reus (meaning “guilty act”) and mens rea (meaning “guilty mind”). The term actus reus simply refers to the fact that a defendant effectually committed the crime as accused (Edersheim, Brendel, & Price, 2012). Mens rea, on the other hand, is defined as “a principle of criminal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” the defendant is appealing his sentence of 111 years and eight months. The defendant was charged and pled guilty to four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, in 1998. During the sentence hearing, the defendant claimed that his actions were caused by a mental disease, and that this…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bsbwor501 Part 1

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    PART 1: SHORT RESPONSE 1. The steps in which the defendant is found guilty is a process of eleven steps. The first step there will be an investigation, shortly after the second step would be too arrest the suspect. When the suspect is escorted to the police station he/she will going through the third step booking into the system. After he/she is booked they will go through the fourth process of attending an initial appearance.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sane Enough to Die Imagine a state of paranoia so great that it starts to seem as if one’s own thoughts are not their own, or auditory and visual hallucinations that continuously speak of the inferiority of the masses, creating an intense sense of superiority in oneself. Such experiences are just a few of the possible symptoms of schizophrenia, a fairly well recognized psychological disorder present in today’s society. Psychological disorders are an incredibly real issue in the modern world that do not receive nearly enough consideration and understanding. It is this issue of mental illness that creates much controversy and indecisiveness in establishing legal guidelines for determining mental competence in the eyes of the law. Specifically, the Supreme Court case of Ford versus (v) Wainwright attempted to establish the constitutionality of executing someone deemed psychologically unfit after the trial process, as well as adequate procedures for doing so.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mens rea required to convict Hutt of first-degree murder is the mens rea of intent plus planned and deliberate. Mr. Hutt threw boiling water on his wife and decided to instead put her in the basement and not aid her with her injuries which resulted in her death. This demonstrates Mr. Hutt’s intention of exercise of free will, the use of particular means to produce a particular result. When an accused is certain or substantially certain that their actions would lead to particular prohibited consequence then in law the accused is held to have intent of the crime.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 a) There are significant charges that could be laid against Alfred, Emily, and Buzfuz. The charges of failure to preserve their child’s life are laid against Alfred and Emily because the parents showed disregard for the safety of their son Job. Alfred and Emily have a duty imposed by the law as parents to provide the necessaries of life to their son under “s. 215(1)” to ensure that their young son Job receives his daily insulin injections in order to benefit his health. This implies that the failure to implement the duty disregards the health of their son to whom the duty is owed, and causes Job to be in a state of unconsciousness. The charges of manslaughter by criminal negligence [s. 222(5)(b)] will also be laid against Alfred and Emily due to their reckless disregard against their son Job.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore V. Texas Case Study

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Health and medical institution have defined mental retardation as the brain development disability. It is the intellectual functioning level of a person that is below average and has significant limitations on decision making. Therefore, a person with a mental retardation should not face the same conviction and penalties as normal individuals. The Texas judicial system should apply the clinical practice’s standards when placing the intellectual impairment of the defendant.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For an individual to be blameworthy and criminally responsible for their actions, the accused person must have committed the actus reus and the mens rea. In the case of the accused pleading Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD), the court focuses on whether the accused had the mens rea while committing the alleged offence (Verdun-Jones, 2015). If the accused person did not know what he or she was doing was wrong, or did not appreciate the conduct or omission, the accused will not be found criminally responsible (Verdun-Jones, 2015). Overall, if the accused is found NCRMD, he or she will most likely be apprehended in the hospital, or supervised in the community to keep the citizens safe from a possible reoccurring…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Although criminal justice requires the correct label to be attached to the defendant’s misconduct, the wide scope of behaviour covered by the Homicide Act 1957 often results in the unfair, and thus harsh, labelling of offenders. This essay will sought to prove that the law of homicide is often too harsh in its assignation of labels to those who cause the death of others, by concentrating on the examples of murder with oblique intent, involuntary manslaughter and the partial defence of infanticide. It will conclude by determining the extent to which the existing law assigns the correct labels to those who commit a homicide, and whether there is thus a need for reform within the law.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mens rea – examines the person’s mental ability, state of mind once a crime has been committed. Once, Mens rea has occurred, the prosecution is liable to prove without admissible evidence that criminal intent was exemplified in order to convict the defendant. The significance of Actus reus and Mens rea in criminal law is based on the difference of crime and the conviction or being not guilty once proof of either act is attained.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham were the founders of the classical theory phenomenon (Piliavin, 1986). The concept was based on several principles, which entailed three main ideologies; free will, where actions are based on one’s own rationality (Burke 2014), more so punishment should apply to the crime as opposed to the criminal, as the theorists believed that a certainty in punishment would deter both the public and criminal (Akers 1999). The perspective adopted throughout will focus on the theories inability to justify the actions of violent homicide offenders, such as Jeffrey Dahmer, and how the high recidivism rates fail to support specific deterrence, even when making the punishment fit the crime. Free will assumes that all individuals…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The meaning of mens rea to me is the intention or knowledge of doing something wrong but not always doing it on purpose (Toney, 2009). Mens rea has some form of intent either general where the person made a conscious decision to commit a crime for whatever reason, specific intent, or negligence intent which in the case of the truck driver was negligence intent, he failed to use reasonable care or caution before he switched over into the other lane (Siegel, Schmalleger, and Worrall, 2014). Yes, he should be convicted if the prosecutor uses the negligence intent because he failed to follow the rules of the road and checking your blind spot is a big issue when teaching truck drivers. It is a flaw that he may get off on it does not mention if…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays