Why Is Concurrence So Significant?

Improved Essays
Actus reus – a Latin term, “the guilty act”. Proper identification of the act is often the most difficult. (Wright, R., 2013). A judge or jury has to determine what specific acts were prohibited by the statue and if the defendant engaged in those specified acts.
Mens rea – examines the person’s mental ability, state of mind once a crime has been committed. Once, Mens rea has occurred, the prosecution is liable to prove without admissible evidence that criminal intent was exemplified in order to convict the defendant.
The significance of Actus reus and Mens rea in criminal law is based on the difference of crime and the conviction or being not guilty once proof of either act is attained.
Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is concurrence so significant?
…show more content…
For example, my neighbor was at a local park in 2009 playing basketball, had a few altercations with some neighborhood kids. While at the park playing basketball, the opposing dudes passed twice and the third time they passed, the driver stopped and went on the court and shot him 6 times in the back. He seen my neighbor turn and run away when he heard the first shot not paying attention that the bullet hit him and the shooter ran behind him and continued to shot. In Louisiana shooting someone constantly or being present at the scene and to leave and come back to the location is considered pre-mediation murder,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Murder is defined as “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.” During the early morning of August 6th, 1996 three men were brutally murdered at a house on Semple Avenue in Winnipeg, also known to have the highest rates of both gang-related and firearm homicides. (Perreault, 2012) On June 26th, 1997, the accused, Robert Tews, Roger Sanderson, and Robert Sanderson were brought into court on the allegations that they had committed the murders of Stefan Zurstegge, Jason Gross, and Thomas Russell Krowetz. On August 5th, 1996, many persons were at the Grant Hotel in Winnipeg, including Krowetz and Gross.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Essay

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 1920s in Burma, a boy in his mid-twenties whom was raised within a brothel as put on trial for the crime of raping and possible murder of a local girl. To the villagers it was an open-and-shut case of a young girl, a virgin, being found naked and injured in the arms of the brothel boy, as he did not flee the scene of the crime. The scene and the victim showed apparent signs that the girl had struggled during the rape, which had caused her to hit her head on a sharp rock. The girl was rushed to her home to seek treatment. The village men beat the boy until he was unconscious and bleeding from several wounds from being repeatedly kicked.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bsbwor501 Part 1

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    PART 1: SHORT RESPONSE 1. The steps in which the defendant is found guilty is a process of eleven steps. The first step there will be an investigation, shortly after the second step would be too arrest the suspect. When the suspect is escorted to the police station he/she will going through the third step booking into the system. After he/she is booked they will go through the fourth process of attending an initial appearance.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    UNITED STATES v. SALERNO, 481 U.S. 739 (1987) History: Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno, a supposed member of the La Cosa Nostra crime family, was detained by the federal courts before the actual trial due to the 1984 Bail Reform Act. The federal court system believed that Salerno was not only a part of a prominent crime family in New York, but that he was potentially dangerous to the community. Facts: Salerno was indicted for several different charges due to the Racketeering, Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act also known as “RICO”. This also included other allegations of mail fraud, wire fraud, extortion, and multiple gambling violations.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidence with the Appalachian School of Law in 2002 where the shooter got stop by a classmate who happened to conceal a gun at the time and was able to took the shooter out by putting a bullet in his back. Another case was the Pearl…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mens rea required to convict Hutt of first-degree murder is the mens rea of intent plus planned and deliberate. Mr. Hutt threw boiling water on his wife and decided to instead put her in the basement and not aid her with her injuries which resulted in her death. This demonstrates Mr. Hutt’s intention of exercise of free will, the use of particular means to produce a particular result. When an accused is certain or substantially certain that their actions would lead to particular prohibited consequence then in law the accused is held to have intent of the crime.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the textbook “Criminal Law in Canada” by Simon Verdun-Jones, there are various types of significant cases that provide insight towards the actus reus elements of a criminal offence. For example, Codlin’s case conveys that Codlin drank alcohol at a party and decides to go home in his car, but he noticed that he was too drunk to drive so he called a taxi to pick him up (Verdun-Jones, 2014, p. 49). However, Codlin decided to sit in his car while waiting for the taxi and removed his key from the ignition to prevent any car mobility, but a police officer noticed Codlin sitting in his car with 150 milligrams of blood alcohol level so he was charged with being in “care or control” of a vehicle while being “over 80” under section 253(1) of the Criminal…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States legal system, people see justice in terms of punishment. A criminal can receive countless years in prison or even be assigned the death penalty. In the article, “The Restoration of faith,” Amitava Kumar shows how forgiveness and understanding can be a better solution than punishment when it comes to criminals. Kumar uses solid evidence and reasoning in his article to show the benefits of Restorative justice. Therefore, Kumar achieved his goal in writing a convincing argument for restorative justice in his article “Restoration of faith.”…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Although criminal justice requires the correct label to be attached to the defendant’s misconduct, the wide scope of behaviour covered by the Homicide Act 1957 often results in the unfair, and thus harsh, labelling of offenders. This essay will sought to prove that the law of homicide is often too harsh in its assignation of labels to those who cause the death of others, by concentrating on the examples of murder with oblique intent, involuntary manslaughter and the partial defence of infanticide. It will conclude by determining the extent to which the existing law assigns the correct labels to those who commit a homicide, and whether there is thus a need for reform within the law.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu expresses in the following simple yet elegant phrase the philosophies inherent in restorative justice, “…true reconciliation exposes the awfulness, the abuse, the hurt, and the truth…”. The frank exposure of emotional, physical and psychological injury may, however, adversely impact the victim(s) or alleged perpetrator in the short term. While restorative justice can be a risky undertaking, “only an honest confrontation with reality can bring real healing”. In the criminal justice system today in the United States, “real healing” seems to be a secondary principle; priority is given to proving the innocence or guilt of the accused in a trial conducted by a judge with the services of lawyers and the jury. The main stakeholders,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All victims and co-victims in any crime are consumed by a strong need to regain control over their own lives and the need for vindication of their rights. Restorative justice needs to find justice for the victims and help them in their healing process. This can be done through the participation of the victim, community and the offender’s active involvement within the justice system. In this theory issues can discussed and are being resolved, all taking place in a safe environment. The goal would be to assure the victim that it is not their fault for what has taken place, the offender’s needs to hear that they’re the ones who were in the wrong and need to take full responsibility for their actions.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mens Rea Definition

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term actus reus simply refers to the fact that a defendant effectually committed the crime as accused (Edersheim, Brendel, & Price, 2012). Mens rea, on the other hand, is defined as “a principle of criminal…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal justice is often centered around simple punishment for the offender. In a situation where a crime creates harm, justice is often synonymous with revenge. Restorative justice and rehabilitative therapy are two different approaches to justice that offer different perspectives and understanding of reconciliation. Both of these approaches allow for healing but the two different theories complete this objective in different ways. Restorative justice and rehabilitative therapy offer different in depth lenses of reconciliation in criminal justice through multi layered perspectives, while also sharing some concepts.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays