Lone Star Republic Essay

Improved Essays
What was the Significance of the Lone Star Republic?

Texas is one of the two states to be an independant country. For nearly a decade, Texas was a lone star republic, officially named the Republic of Texas. This all started in 1821, when mexico became independent from spain, with Mexico controlling Texas. When Mexico banned slaves, Texas felt, Which started a big war between them. The Lone Star Republic was significant becau

Texas pursued independance all because of how Mexico treated them. It all started when The Americans were expected to become Mexican. The Texans didn’t want this, but they grudgingly agreed. Then, Mexico passed a law that all travelers from the United States had to change their religious beliefs to catholic. When slavery
…show more content…
“When Texas got their independence from Mexico in 1836, they wanted to join the U.S. However, they wouldn’t become a state for almost a decade. There were a few reasons they had to wait so long . One reason was slavery. There had been a balance between free and slave states, and if they added texas, the balance would be unset. Northerners were concerned this would allow for slavery policies and laws to be made”(enotes.com. enotes.com, n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .). There was also concern that letting Texas in immediately would have led to a war with mexico. Santa anna gave Texas freedom, but the government didn’t accept the status of Texas. There was some concern, as Mexico had said that if Texas was annexed, they would go to war. This is another reason the Union did not annex Texas right away. Texas was an independent republic called The Lone Star Republic from 1836-18450. Naturally, There was another side of the argument. The south of the United States. The Southern States wanted to annex Texas because they believed it would enter the Union as a Slave State increasing the power of southern members in the senate(Drayer, David. socratic.org. Socratic, 16 Aug. 2016. Web. 20 Nov. 2017.). They also believed in manifest destiny. Manifest Destiny was the belief that American expansion was destined to expand across the continent. Since Texas …show more content…
After Texas went independant, They joined the United States. The war was a territory grab by the U.S. Although President James Knox Polk made sure that the Mexicans shot first, by purposefully placing American troops in contested territory. In the 1844 campaign President Polk did not promise he would not seize California from Mexico with force, as his major mission was to Expand the U.S., as the major plank of his platform was U.S. expansion across the continent. Also, Polk had also called for the annexation of all of the Oregon country, which was also claimed by Britain and Russia. One of his campaign slogans had been "54-40 or fight!", referring to the northern boundary of the Oregon territory. In the end, the U.S. and Britain compromised, with the U.S. taking the parts of Oregon that now comprise the states of Idaho, Oregon and Washington, while Britain took what is now the Canadian province of British Columbia, while Russia kept the edge of Alaska. This was probably because America was scared of Britain more than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In February 2, 1848 a treaty was signed that treaty was signed in Villa de Guadalupe Hidalgo, that treaty was then called the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was a peace treaty to gain peace between Mexico and the United States, the U.S. and Mexico had been having some problems between each other like wars and a lot of bad things. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American war(war between the U.S. and Mexico!) This treaty would forever change the way that the Mexicans and the Americans would look at each other. Before the treaty started Mexico was having some government problems, Santa Anna(Mexico’s president) was elected in 1833.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    North and South, each side fighting for what they believe in. Since the North did not want slavery and the South did, they began arguing about either to have slaves or not. Six states in the southern part of the U.S. seceded and formed “The Confederacy,” against the North. Later, Texas became the seventh state to join the Confederacy. Then began the Civil War.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After this Texas became part of United States as there were more immigration from other parts of America to Texas. So, on 1836 a new constitution was formed under U.S. Constitution; The Texas Republic in the Constitution and other remaining Constitution are ; Texas State Constitution of 1845, The…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas gained independence from Mexico and soon after joined the…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a distinct nation, Texas believed to have held a different scope of sovereignty. According to “The Declaration of Causes”, Texas stated that they interpreted their annexation into the United States as one free, sovereign, and independent nation joining a union with other co-equal states. Texas thought of themselves as a central authority with more sovereignty over their nation than the Federal Union. Texas, therefore, regarded themselves as nation that formed a continental partnership among other nations that were free and sovereign within their respected borders. Each state was essentially separate and equal and had no control of the other.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe Texas wouldn’t even make it in a week they would need a lot of help in every way possible, financially, with the military or army, with their own currencies, and with political loss. If Texas even tried to become its own country they will lose money, no citizens would get any help from the government and some families would starve to death, they might lose jobs even people for example some immigrants help us financially and if they see a big change they would either move to a different state from the United States, or they would go back to their own country. Some companies or business people could lose their customers because of this, a lot of people only like to deal with people from the United States, but the moment they see Texas…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quick war was fought and Mexico lost, as terms of their surrender Mexico essentially gave the United States the West Coast, which includes California, New Mexico, and Arizona. The war between the Mexico and United States could be connected to Manifest Destiny because people in Texas did not want to abide by the Mexican laws because they felt they did not have to follow because it was not in God’s will. For Manifest Destiny gave them the right to settle as far west as they want and not follow any other rules except for America, because America was permitted by God to settle west. Manifest Destiny and westward expansion was also a political factor because it allowed for President James Polk to come to power, and spur on westward expansion. Under James Polk, the victory of…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Annexation Of Texas Essay

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Annexation of Texas The annexation of Texas by the United States remains a controversial topic to this day. Occurring in 1845, it caused a great uproar amongst the citizens of the United States and Texas. The main question when debating the annexation of Texas is how it affected slavery. Indeed, and because the annexation of slavery served to extend the area in which slavery would be allowed, this caused a situation in which it shifted the balance of power away from the North and towards the South in relation to the question of slavery.…

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Secession

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the past century, states’ rights has become an idea more than an actual right given to the people. The Central Government has gradually gathered more power for itself and, as a consequence, leaving states wanting. In December of 1860, South Carolina tried to solve this problem by seceding from the union. While it would be unfair to say that this caused the civil war, it defiantly was a factor. But since then, the problem has only grown worse.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whenever there is a conflict or situation with territorial more than likely there a fight or war involved. The Westward expansion was no different. While there was people like John O’Sullivan who was advocates for westward expansion, there where people like W.E. Channing who did not agree with the concept of westward expansion or Manifest Destiny. In W.E. Channing editorial Denouncing Expansion he wrote “Having unfolded the argument against the annexation of Texas from the criminality of the revolt, I proceed to second very solemn consideration, namely, that by this act our country will enter of a career of encroachment, war, and crime, and will merit and incur the punishment and woe of aggravated wrong-doing. The seizure of Texas will not stand alone.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays