Kant's Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals

Improved Essays
In chapter one of Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues that human’s purpose is not happiness, mainly in order to further defend his previous claim that a good will can be considered good without any necessary qualification.
Kant agrees with the principle that no instrument for any purpose would be found in a being unless it was the most appropriate instrument for that purpose. This is why he claims that nature would have made a grave mistake if it burdened reason with finding happiness. Happiness, he writes, could be “attained far more surely by instinct than it ever could be by reason”. Instinct seems to mesh much better with finding happiness than reason does, as reason can cause desires to be skewed, while instinct

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    art IIII: Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant published A Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) five years after Bentham’s Principles of Morals and Legislations, launching a scathing critique of utilitarianism. Kant proposed that a moral action does not suggest treating individuals as a means to an end. What Kant means by this is that we treat individuals for the sake of something else (means), such as Dudley and Stephens treating Parker as a means to maximise happiness. Instead, a moral action is one that treats individuals as ends in themselves, one that does not account for external influences such as happiness. Individuals are worthy of dignity and respect not because we own our bodies and minds but because we are rational beings, capable of reason and conscious thought.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Happiness I: Kant’s view of the Concept (or Idea) of Happiness In this section, through an analysis of Kant’s Groundwork, Critique of Practical Reason, and The Metaphysics of Morals, I will demonstrate: (1) The elements of happiness and what happiness is about; (2) The concept of happiness is different for different humans; (3) The principle of happiness is the same for different humans; and (4) Why having the same content and principle of happiness for all humans is not a principle of the categorical imperative (CI).…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fundamental idea that Kant introduces in the second half of Chapter 2 is that rational beings are "ends in themselves. " When you settle on a course of action, Kant notes, you do not think of yourself as a means to some other purpose; you think of yourself as the purpose or "end" to which all your actions are directed. If you expect other people to accept your motives, you must respect the fact that other people also think of themselves as more than mere means to other goals. Thus your motives will lack universal validity unless you respect the fact that all rational beings have intrinsic worth, just as you do. The categorical imperative requires you to treat all your fellows as "ends in themselves"--that is, as objects of intrinsic value--and…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who was born on April 22, 1724. He is a central figure in modern philosophy. One of his biggest works is “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” that was written in 1785. Kant argued that right actions are only right if those actions are not instigated by impulses or desires, but by practical reason. He believes that actions are only right if it fulfills one’s duty.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hume Vs. Kant: Morality

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hume's position in ethics, which is based on his empiricist theory of the mind, is best known for asserting four theses: (1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (see Section 3) (2) Moral distinctions are not derived from reason (see Section 4). (3) Moral distinctions are derived from the moral sentiments: feelings of approval (esteem, praise) and disapproval (blame) felt by spectators who contemplate a character trait or action (see Section 7). (4) While some virtues and vices are natural (see Section 13), others, including justice, are artificial (see Section 9). There is heated debate about what Hume intends by each of these theses and how he argues for them. He articulates and defends them…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s Ethics- Morals, Happiness, and Human Life Kant’s Ethics is a work that reflects how Immanuel Kant perceived ethics through morals and happiness and painted a picture of human life through these things. Ethics is what is defined as things that guide a person’s actions or their behavior. In Kant’s Groundwork, he discusses morals- what we consider to be right and wrong, and how we feel or duty, good will, or inclinations influence our morals which in turn influence our actions. Another thing that is crucial in Kant’s ethics is the role of happiness- are we selfish all of the time or do we ever want to do for others?…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism and Kant are two branches of philosophy that differ greatly between them. The former evaluates the morality of an action depending on the consequences. Utilitarianism is mainly concerned with producing a greater amount of happiness over unhappiness. Considering how they evaluate the morality of an action, we can assume that utilitarian’s’ moral status is make up of individuals that do feel unhappiness as well as happiness. On the other hand, and the other one believes that actions are bad or good by themselves.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Ethics of The Stranger Meursault follows the doctrine of Kantian ethics. Followers of Kant believe that you should act in a way you expect others to act. He helps people out in their time of need, he conforms to his sense of duty when making important life decisions, and he assumes responsibility for his actions when he does not adhere to his principles. In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant spoke of the categorical imperative.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “For the sake of its own security, each nation can and should demand that the others enter into a contract resembling the civil one and guaranteeing the right of each (Kant pg 115).” Immanuel Kant has the idea of perpetual peace that could only be obtained through our universal morality. He writes a lot about morality to try and inform his readers that internationally, morality within humans needs to be acted on in a way other humans would agree with. Kant wants humans to act in a universally accepted manner. For example, if you believe stealing is okay, then you should think it is okay when someone steals from you.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to what the book and Kant say, happiness is not a product of reason but rather reason actually reduces people’s happiness. Instead, reason produces good will. Another thing Kant talks about is the relationship between a good will and duty. A good will is a will that acts for duty and actions are only moral if they are driven by duty, good will in turn. Acting when duty is the only reason to act is morally right.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After laying out his most widely known iteration of the categorical imperative, [“Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law” (Kant 37)], Kant establishes some universal laws that follow from it. In light of his previous discussion of the importance of good will—namely that a good will is the only thing good without limitation, Kant additionally considers the relationship between our will and the universal laws that spring from the categorical imperative. Kant suggests the will “as a faculty of determining itself to action in accord with the representation of certain laws” (45) and makes a distinction between means and ends. Rational beings, for Kant, are to be treated as ends in themselves. That is to say, it is…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Metaphysics

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout history the discipline of metaphysics is not able to answer the rebuttal of nihilism, but through the lens of Heidegger, the field undertakes a metamorphose into a phoenix by going back to its core. Metaphysics is arguably a failure of a philosophy because it is never answers the question of how does it(existence) stand with being. However, that is not the only goal of metaphysics just pure speculation and observation of it will continue to advance the field. Consequently, metaphysics must be brought back to the beginning, to show the fruits of metaphysics and its success, through Desein, the historical implications of how Desein impacts Western thought, the bridge Heidegger forms with Aristotle through Desein. These observations…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant has defined a will so good that it does not have to by entirely good, but it needs to be the highest of all goods. This good will, as defined by Kant, is not good because of its effects but as itself. Reason, in this manner, is almost not needed for certain tasks as instincts are perfectly capable of replacing reason. Furthermore, the concept of one’s duty goes hand in hand with Kant’s good will. Goodness is not a result from acting on an impulse of an individual’s belief of Mother Nature.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant And Obligation

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For Kant, the goodness of an action is not determined by the consequences or outcomes of an action. Kant has decided that the intention that one possesses behind their action is how we measure whether the action is bad or good. Kant has determined that in order to intend a good action a rational agent must possess the good will to do the action. This is a measure of whether you are dealing with an individual that possess good morals within themselves. Kant has gone on to say that possessing good will is one thing, but the reason we go on to do a good action is the result of a sense of obligation.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays