Prompt: Do you agree or disagree with the following: “Evil means justify honorable ends.” Using your knowledge of the text, write a well thought out analysis relating to the quote. In Catch-22, the definition of terms such as ‘evil’ and ‘honorable’ are as warped and contorted as possible. As a result, there is an unethical solace found in the ruling of the bureaucracy, who, as stated in the journal prior, are the clear antagonists.…
Natural Law vs. Positive Law In spite of the personal opposition to the issue of slavery, President Abraham Lincoln took office in 1861 citing his constitutional duty of keeping the nation together rather than abolishing slavery. Lincoln intended to reunite the Union. Nonetheless, there were critical issues during the war, which compelled him to contend with slavery under his leadership.…
The “Just War” theory was created with the intent of helping determine whether someone could justify war ( jus ad bellum), what the conduct during war should be (jus in bello), and if the end goal was for peace or termination of the war (jus post bellum). Before the Crusades, Pope Urban II gave speeches to rally up support for war against Muslims who had taken control of Christian land. Although Urban II’s ideas seem reasonable, they actually contradict the “just war” theory. He uses any means to make war justifiable, but his speech was missing a few aspects to make it so.…
1A Aquinas’ three conditions that make war “just” are: Proper authority, Just cause, and the right intention (PP. 4). The first condition states that war can only be declared by the highest authority in government, the head of state. The purpose of declaring war is to give the other state a chance to make peace. If the parties involved are not able to reach a peaceful settlement, then the head of state of of the second nation must refuse to resolve. At this point, both sides have tried to come to peace and haven’t and are aware that war is coming.…
The third reason Dr. Land proposes for a justifiable war is last resort. When a war is entered because peaceful reasoning, among other peaceful methods, has been exhausted, war is justified (Land). Before the Israelite Exodus from Egypt, Moses asked multiple times for Pharaoh to set the Israelites free. Pharaoh consistently refused, occasionally allowing the Israelites to leave but retracting this release before they got away.…
In In Defense of War, Nigel Biggar argues that war can be a just means to correct acts of injustice taken by many countries, and that it is the duty of other countries to defend those who cannot defend themselves; just war, therefore, must be a humanitarian, defensive action. Biggar supports this thesis by first explaining the two basic principles of just war: jus ad bellum-- regarding the justice of going to war in the first place-- and in bello-- regarding justice in the course of fighting while in war. Within these two categories are multiple subtopics. In order for a war to be considered just with regards to its initiation-- jus ad bellum-- the war must first have just cause.…
Introduction Through the existence of humans—and their evolution of civilization—war has been an unavoidable action. Throughout time, blood has been shed, cries have been shouted, and conflict has soared with some plummeting; however, the powers of war have been a long lasting concern on the social, political, and even moral levels. That most climacteric issue of war power to researchers, political scientists, and social scientists is the dilemma of who should have the power to bring a nation to war. More specifically to America, who should have the conclusive voice to bring the United States of America to a position of war with other parts of the world—Congress or the Commander in Chief?…
The principles of jus ad bellum (“justice of war”) and jus in bello (“justice in war”) are the fundamental principles of the Just War Theory, which is the military ethical doctrine that justifies the reasons and methods of war. Each principle has a set of criteria that must be met in order for the act of war and conduct in war to be considered morally justifiable. Ethicists and historians question whether the use of the nuclear bombs in Japan met the necessary and reasonable criteria of the jus ad bellum principle as well as the discrimination and proportionality criteria of jus in bello. As nuclear proliferation continues to be one of the greatest threats to international security, President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima…
The fundamental objective of international law, to regulate the relations between sovereign states, has become a standard to evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to international law. Various philosophical disciplines have interpreted the importance and usefulness of international law in order to establish a better understanding of how international law is to be executed. This paper will take a thorough look at how two different philosophers have explained the concepts and principles that make up international law. Specifically, analyzing how Niccolò Machiavelli and Hugo Grotius present contrasting ideas of the original principles of international law and propose different ways through which international law should be justly…
Just war is not considered a sin under the 5th commandment because every effort has been made to avoid war. The Catechism says a war is considered just if “the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave and certain, all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective, and there must be serious prospects of success” (Catechism…
War is brutal way to solve a world problem, but sometimes necessary. Wars have been happening for years and centuries, for many different reasons. Many people have fought for love, religion, ideology, and land. The great ancestor of America, the land of the free, had snatched from the indigenous people now known as Native Americans. So in what situations can war be allowed?…
2. I believe that there are a few reasons a war would be considered just. A fight for freedom and independence from a tyrannical government that is oppressing its people would be a valid reason to wage war. I also…
When exactly is military force justified? Is it ever justified? The answer lies, of course, in the eyes of the beholder. But when one considers…
Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…
The principles relating to the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in general, are well settled and applied consistently. The maxim Res Ipsa Loquitor, allows the claimant to succeed in action for negligence even when there is no evidence as to what caused the accident and whether it was attributable to negligence on the part of the defendant. It shifts the onus of burden to the defendant.…