Jury Trials Research Paper

Decent Essays
Operation of Jury Trials
By Runi Latham
What is a jury?
The jury is the tribunal of fact, made up of 12 adult citizens whom are selected randomly from the electoral role in accord with the requirements of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW). This process is called empanelling.
The role of the jury is to consider the evidence presented during an indictable trial and then determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty based upon the evidence presented at trial. The jury’s decision may be challenged in two ways: pre-emptory (no reason needs to be given) or cause (a reason must be given). Juries do not play a role in determining a sentence.
What stage of the trial process does this issue occur?
Juries for criminal cases are available in the District
…show more content…
The jury act made every person enrolled as an elector in New South Wales responsible to serve as a juror, and reduced the grounds of exclusion.
The jury act has been reformed since 1977. The Jury (Amendment) Act 1987 made adjustments such as reducing the number of peremptory challenges available to the defence and prosecution in criminal proceedings and making it an offence to solicit information from a juror/former juror about the deliberations of a jury. In 2004, The Jury Amendment Act 2004
Made amendments prohibiting jurors from making inquiries about the accused or issues in the trial, except in the proper exercise of juror
…show more content…
Gittany pleaded guilty and the case was heard in the Supreme Court. However on application, it was ordered that the trial be heard by judge alone. This raised questions as to why a high-profile defendant facing a murder charge was to be tried without a jury. Trials without jury are usually held when excessive media coverage may influence juror’s opinion and cause an unfair trial. However when a trial is expected to be lengthy and evidence is extremely complex an application for a trial by judge alone may be made. This is an example of how access to technology is leading to less reliance on jury

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Duty Case Study

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although some find this an unreasonable task to ask of anyone, these people do not want to take the time to learn about community news and issues. Allowing oneself to be involved in the community gains friends, knowledge, and joy. Jury duty should be viewed as another opportunity to experience these aspects of life and not as a…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury nullification provides the power necessary to prevent manic judges and prosecutors from abusing their power. Judge Bazelon agrees the jury should be told of their…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this means that there may also be a prodigious amount of room for mistake in convictions. Therefore, the jury system is not as effective as a bench trial due to it not being judged by a professional on the subject of law, the manner in which the court selects jurors is unfair, and the way that the jury is forced to decide can cause some poor judgment. Judges are given the powers they have because they are professionals on their subject matter; however, a jury is not quite the same. A jury trial is a trial that has twelve randomly selected citizens coming to a verdict instead of a judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, jurors should be aware of their right to determine what they think should happen, no matter what the law states. In the video, judges decide if the jurors get to know their right as a jury member. They will not do it because they do not want the jury members to overrule the judge’s opinion. On the other hand, people would take advantage of this. People who are rich could easily pay off some of the jury members to walk away from a situation clean.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juries face aggravated murder, racketeering, aggravated bribery, and crimes against justice. When the jury trials were first reinstated, the majority of the cases heard by juries were of murder with aggravating circumstances and rapes. Only 20% of the cases considered by jury trials were for civil crimes. When deliberating, jurors fill out a questionnaire with questions along the lines of; had sufficient evidence been provided to suggest a crime was committed, are they guilty or innocent, and should the defendant receive a harsh or less harsh punishment?…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Trial For Juveniles

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For this assignment, I chose two articles that studied jury trials for juveniles. The first article; “The Verdict on Jury Trials for Juveniles: The Effects of Defendant’s Age on Trial Outcomes” studied the effect that the age of the defendant has on the jury’s verdict. The second article; “Jurors’ Perceptions of Juvenile Defendants: The Influence of Intellectual Disability, Abuse History, and Confession Evidence” studied the perception jurors have towards juvenile defendants. Both of these research studies, studied the relationship between juvenile defendants and the jury’s’ opinion of the juvenile defendant based on specific criteria.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is A Jury Trial

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages

    A jury trial is a trial in which a group of random people chosen from the community, decides whether the evidence presented to them is valid. Based on the evidence, the jury reaches a verdict and decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty and the judge will decide the appropriate sentence. The purpose of a jury trial is to address the issues of a dispute between two or more parties.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics