Is Killing Worse Than Letting Die Analysis

Improved Essays
Is killing worse than letting die or is letting die worse than killing? That is the question that has been posed in the last module of this course. The natural view is that killing is worse than letting die. Phillipa Foot and Judith Thomson both give their points of view of the topic. The issue with this topic is that everyone including Foot and Thomson have their own opinions as to which one is worse. We are also presented with positive and negative duties which can help influence what we think when it comes to killing versus letting die. We can have the positive duty of not letting someone die and we can have the negative duty of not killing. Negative duties are more stringent than positive duties. I personally feel that killing is worse …show more content…
This shows us that Thomson is more focused on the act itself. Which makes me think that Thomson wants us to have a reason or justification as to why we should kill or let die. Thomson wants that person to have a claim as to why they are for or against something. Debating the issue of killing versus letting die is interesting to me because I feel that it really depends on the situation. I agree with Judith Thomson’s views because she feels that the person has to have a reason behind their actions. I honestly feel that letting die can be just as bad as killing and killing can be just as bad as letting die it just depends on the situation. I have had the decision with a group of peers on euthanasia, assisted suicide, is ethical or not and after having the debate I honestly felt like it would have to be up to that person or that family member. Although I feel this way I think that there would be the issue of someone feeling guilty because they feel responsible for that person’s death. It is just so many factors that can go into this subject, but if I had to pick a side I would say that killing is worse than letting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomson’s and Marquis’ Views on Abortion The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that the decision should be up to the terminally ill patient’s family on whether they should die by the use of certain medicines instead of natural causes. I don’t feel it’s right to be up to the doctor or the patient because sometimes patients get misdiagnosed. Richard Brant mentions that euthanasia is a way of relieving the pain someone is feeling and defines suicide as doing something that results in one’s death. Moreover, Dan Brock argues that euthanasia is not a bad thing especially active euthanasia. Daniel Callahan is against euthanasia because he thinks it will leads in the wrong direction.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout this research paper I will be discussing the different views, attitudes and opinions about physician assisted suicide. This discussion will first include a summarization of journal articles that discuss an ethical issue in health care which in this case is physician assisted suicide. Second, include a description of the portions in SALPNs code of ethics and how and why they relate to the chosen issue. Next, after taking everything into consideration with the articles and SALPNs code of ethics I will discuss how assisted suicide relates to the nursing profession. Lastly, I will discuss my position as a student practical nurse on assisted suicide and how this research has influenced my opinion.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is illegal and needs to be legalized to help the patients who are in pain. The patient should have more of an opinion in this than the family. The patient's family might want them to keep them alive, not realizing how much pain the family member is in. There are many reasons why these people deserve to have a choice, some of which include; It saves lives, It opens up spaces in the hospital for curable, serious disease patients, and these patients could be used…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rachels and Brock” Rachels thesis is active euthanasia is morally permissible under conditions when passive euthanasia is morally permissble and the patient wants active euthanasia. Rachels argue there is not a difference between killing someone or letting one die( Rachels pg 649). Rachels makes reference to patients with terminal illness. Once treatment is no longer allievate pain, the patient and family is requesting help because of the suffering. Rachels introduce another point the Conventional Doctrine makes decisions concerning life or death on irrelevant grounds( Rachels pg. 650).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, by killing we are taking away a fundamental right we are born with: the right to live. Burns is stuck on this idea that by being angry, we show that we care; he states “ if someone does not become angry with an insult or an injury suffered…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “ Active and Passive Euthanasia,” by James Rachel he makes the argument that there is nothing morally wrong with Passive Euthanasia that’s given to be acceptable. Passive Euthanasia letting someone die becoming permissible is an acceptance Rachel proves from the behalf standards of medical reasons. Medical reasons doctors can take out tubes, respirator, etc.. “Letting go” is a decision making doctors do for the patient to die having no pain of suffrage anymore. It’s not a consequence for causing a death on purpose, “ the matter of life and death is being decided on irrelevant grounds.” (Rachel, p.290).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson Abortion Analysis

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For Judith Jarvis Thomson abortion is something that should be a negative right, provided that it has certain guidelines. One in which abortions are neither a right that should be given nor taken away. Thomson begins by arguing that there is no right time to mark the point in which a person should begin to be considered a person. She then gives an example of an oak tree and how it is not called an oak tree at the beginning, but goes through stages to become an oak tree. Nevertheless, Thomson does agree that a fetus becomes a person at some point before it’s born, even though there is no indication to when this occurs.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is a growing controversial issue in the world today, mainly in the United States. “Abortion is one the most common medical performed in the United States each year” (Suzann, 1). The issue has become more prominent as years’ progress for a variety of reasons, to include the fact that the “traditional” family’s existence is fading. Abortion became legalized during the Roe v Wade case in 1973, now a little over one million abortions are performed each year. Women are becoming undesirably pregnant at alarming rates, many who feel they are unable to effectively take care of a child.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She isn’t claiming that abortions are always permissible or that it is permissible to secure the death of an unborn child. I do not believe in abortion for reasons I will not address at this time and therefore am not claiming to feel the same Thomson does about all of her arguments, but I do agree that the “right to life” argument is not a solid one. With the analogies Thomson set out, it is clear that cases must be looked at individually because the details make all the difference. I feel she succeeds in her goal. She challenges the way I feel about abortion and requires that I justify my reasons for or against it for more than just the fetus’s “right to…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Smriti Kochhar James Rachel in “Active and Passive Euthanasia” tells us the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the role it plays in medical ethics. Being directly involved in the killing of an individual is more socially unacceptable than withholding treatment and watching someone die. However, according to Rachel, both are equally reprehensible. Rachel’s views on active and passive euthanasia are predominantly neutral.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This asserts that the wrongness of killing drives from the unproblematic assumption that killing you or me is prima facie wrong. Furthermore, the reason killing you or me is wrong is because, as victims of death, we would assume the greatest possible loss of any conceivable crime. That is the loss of our future; our future holds every activity, project, experience, and enjoyment that we will ever have. Marquis continues that the…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The advantages of euthanasia is helping some people from suffering illness to a person. The benefits are shared mainly by the family of the patient since it saves the health costs and reduces the financial burden on them. It would be a great strain for the friends and family to look after someone who is terminally ill so Euthanasia benefits in this way too. The truth we need to accept is that, the medical supplies being used on a terminally ill patient could be used for a patient who is more likely to recover sooner or later.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays