Summary Of Judith Thomson's Defense Of Abortion

Superior Essays
Abortion is a growing controversial issue in the world today, mainly in the United States. “Abortion is one the most common medical performed in the United States each year” (Suzann, 1). The issue has become more prominent as years’ progress for a variety of reasons, to include the fact that the “traditional” family’s existence is fading. Abortion became legalized during the Roe v Wade case in 1973, now a little over one million abortions are performed each year. Women are becoming undesirably pregnant at alarming rates, many who feel they are unable to effectively take care of a child. My thesis is that Thomson argues that abortion is permissible is some cases, however, her examples provided, do not always properly support her argument. Thomson makes a variety of arguments during Defense of Abortion that mostly combat the view that all abortion is morally impermissible. She believes that in most cases people decisions of whether abortion is morally permissible versus impermissible is dependent on whether a person believes that an embryo is a person. This suggests that since the embryo is a person then …show more content…
In the case of the violinist she neglects to address the age difference between a fetus and the violinist, fails to make the fetus equal with that which represents it in story, and does not take into account the different emotional connections that take place with a stranger versus a fetus. Thomson’s case about Henry ford did not accurately represent the choices that the mother makes in an abortion oversimplifying, and adding details that lead the reader to be less sympathetic towards one side. Although she did not cover all bases on those tow arguments the chocolate box argument was a great example to support her idea that the right to life is not just about being killed, but contrarily in the right to not be killed in an unjust

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In this argument, the limitation placed on the right to life is taking resources from others. One example would be needing an organ transplant. Needing an organ to survive does not entitle you to take it from someone else, and it does not entitle you to certain other resources, like the best hospital or the soonest transplant time. Thomson follows this argument to its logical conclusion. If a fetus has a right to life, but the right to life has limitations on what resources you can take from other people, then the fetus has no right to the body of the woman carrying it.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I make the start of a rational and mature argument, Thomson would respond in the following way. She acknowledges that her argument can be found unsatisfactory “ First, while I do argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that it is always permissible” (Thomson, J. Judith). Thomson agrees that if the minimal requirement is to carry the fetus to term then the minimally decent mother shall not fall below. There are certain circumstances that she deems abortion to be impermissible.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson, believes; in her own way that abortion is okay. And while there is some certain aspects where I would agree, her main argument is something I could never stand firm in. In her paper “A Defense of Abortion” Thomson…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her article, “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thomson maintains that there are instances where a woman might engage in voluntary and mutually consensual sex, but it does not give the fetus the right to inhabit a woman’s body. In a comparison, she points out the absurdity to allow a burglar to stay in your house, even though you might be partially to blame for their presence through a window left open. In this paper, I will reconstruct her argument using the analogy that an unplanned pregnancy is as akin to an open window as an invitation to an unwanted intruder and argue how it falls short of the mark and does not consider or take into account the responsibility attached as the consequence of one’s actions. In Thompson’s view, it is…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, him being a famous violinist he will be able to provide comfort by using his music and his talent for other people. Likewise, would be described for the mother, fetus, and abortion. If the mother lets the fetus live in her body, then she is doing it for the greater good of the fetus. If the fetus is aborted, then it is committing an act of greater good for the mother. This metaphor is an example of when abortion is permissible.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    -Judith Jarvis Thomson is a moral philosopher, who wrote A Defense of Abortion in1971. This piece of writing is still causing uproar even in the present time over the continuous argument of abortion. She is for abortion in the right circumstances, and in order to fight the people against her, she wrote this piece of writing. In this text, she states that a fetus is not a person and does not have the right to life, but in order to fight against objections towards her she agrees that a fetus is a person, only for the sake of this argument. She is saying that the usual argument against abortion is “all persons have a right to life, a fetus is a person, therefore they have right to life, therefore abortion is wrong.”.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of the argument, we consider the fetus to be a person and have the right to life. Opposed to Thomson, I believe that aborting the fetus should be considered unjust killing because it is being deprived of the right to use the mother's body. My first and obvious premise are that the mother is causally responsible for the existence of the fetus. By casually responsible I mean to say that the mother partially caused the fetus to exist, while performing sex.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the piece written by Thomson she spoke about the mom having a cardiac condition. This is an example as to why a woman would want to get an abortion for her health and also ensuring that when she does choose to have a child she will be there for her baby and love he or she unconditionally. An example of over using abortions is just simple not using contraceptives and aborting the baby because you chose not to use protection. This is a reason that some may feel the need to get rid of abortions altogether but in the end there will always be exceptions to…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Permissibility of Abortion: Noonan V. Thompson The topic of abortion has been of much dispute throughout time. Some seeing abortion as the mother’s right to choice, others as murder. Most pro-life supporters argue that fetuses have the right to life and to aborting it is murder. Judith Thompson concedes that fetuses may have the right to life but that only gives the fetus a right to not be unjustly killed.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Thomson Abortion

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is abortion defendable? So many different view and opinions arise from this question. Who are we to say that it is morally right or wrong? Judith Thomson has formed the people seeds analogy that supports the woman 's right over her body. Altogether, Judith Thomson has valid and controversial arguments.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thompson uses the example of a famous violinist in dire need of medical attention, where the reader is the only possible remedy so and is forcefully captured without consent, so that they may be connected to the violinist through a lifeline to cure his disease. The reader is told they must remain in their bed for however long as it takes for the violinist to recover, even if that means the reader must sacrifice their own life in order to save the famous violinist. Thompson is pro-choice advocate, this analogy supports her argument because the reader has absolutely no obligation to the violinist, but is forced to become subject to him anyway. This can relate similarly to if a woman who were raped, she has no obligation to a child she would…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The separation between morally acceptable and morally wrong makes it difficult for individuals to generate a potential decision of whether or not an abortion is permissible. Special cases change the structure in which a moral decision can be made as failed contraception was implemented to tilt the balance of a moral decision. Also, special cases that involve the mother and fetus give added tension of determination of life and to who has the rights to live. Thomson’s challenge of morality enables us to examine abortion from different views. It is not of how life beings, but when life…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would base their moral stance on abortion on exactly when they believe ‘life’ begins; and when a foetus consequently becomes a person. However, the absence of an empirically determined timescale means that anybody’s guess is valid here, and so unless one side can produce an argument that is equally relevant regardless of whether the foetus is human yet, debates on the topic are essentially reduced to ‘yes-no’ level quarrels. Thompson (A Defence of Abortion, 1971) made an attempt at such an argument with her violinist example. Here she argues that one would not be morally obliged to spend nine months plugged into a strangers’ circulatory system to prevent them from dying of kidney failure, and that it therefore follows that a woman…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Creating such a framework in 1971 may have been somewhat ahead of its time, but might have aided the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973. A moral framework of this nature would have been instrumental in developing the associated legal framework. As it stands, the legal status of abortion in the United States suffers from grave constitutional concerns and periodic attacks. Thomson’s argument is not incorrect, but suffers from the fatal flaw of being too narrow in scope. If she had considered rights other than the fetus’ right to life and the mother’s right to her bodily integrity, she would not have needed to resort to a rather non-intuitive argument that one’s right to life is simply the right not to be killed unjustly.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays