Now that framing of homosexuals is no longer overtly negative, when the media talk about homosexuality it is typically framed using terms such as rights or lobbying, this is done to fit within the two most quoted sides of the debate (Sollis, 2000). These two frames are popular amongst the debate over Davis. Those against Davis believe allowing Davis to have a religious exemption to not issue marriage licenses would further exacerbate the inequality already experienced by the group. Furthermore, when the issue of gay rights is covered in the media typically there are conservatives quoted who look at homosexuality negatively and liberals who still differentiate gay people from others (Sollis, 2000). These same groups then attempt to compare homosexuals to
Now that framing of homosexuals is no longer overtly negative, when the media talk about homosexuality it is typically framed using terms such as rights or lobbying, this is done to fit within the two most quoted sides of the debate (Sollis, 2000). These two frames are popular amongst the debate over Davis. Those against Davis believe allowing Davis to have a religious exemption to not issue marriage licenses would further exacerbate the inequality already experienced by the group. Furthermore, when the issue of gay rights is covered in the media typically there are conservatives quoted who look at homosexuality negatively and liberals who still differentiate gay people from others (Sollis, 2000). These same groups then attempt to compare homosexuals to