General Intent Definition

Decent Essays
Frequently, statutes don’t clearly state whether the offenses they describe require specific or general intent. Rather, courts determine a crime’s intent element by following the general rule that terms like “knowingly” and “voluntarily” denote general intent (as in "knowingly and voluntarily use force against another"). Terms that describe something more than knowledge and voluntariness, like purpose, tend to indicate specific intent (as in "knowingly and voluntarily use force against someone with the intent to disable him or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: Jim, who lives in Detroit Michigan, had a few drinks at a local bar but was not intoxicated. Before he left he asked the bartender for a drink of water, who in error gave him a 6oz cup of 40% Vodka. Jim drank it quickly noticing the strength of the liquid but figured it was his imagination as he had requested water. The Vodka went straight to his head and he became intoxicated, causing him to lose control of his car which jumped a curb and killed two people. Jim was arrested and put on trial under Michigan’s “causing death while operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated” statute which carries a 15 year prison sentence.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction When it comes to Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments, perceptions of others can sometimes vary. Some may agree that the punishment goes with the crime, while others may argue that there are stipulations that can be enacted due to extenuating circumstances for the defendant of the crime. In this body of work, the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force, the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and the stand your ground law, the overall role in the double jeopardy clause, the basic features of the adversarial system and lastly the authors’ opinion in the speedy trial section of the sixth amendment, if it is necessary or not and the reasons why will be…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Thursday, November 12th, I visited the Fredericksburg General District Court of the 15th Judicial District of Virginia to observe cases beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Virginia General District Court is the lowest level of the Virginia court system and is the most common court citizens of Virginia have contact with. The General District Court is a limited jurisdiction trial court that conducts trials involving traffic infractions and other criminal misdemeanor offenses, hears civil cases involving amounts of under $25,000, and holds preliminary hearings in felony cases. They do not conduct jury trials and all cases are heard and decided by the judge. There are 32 judicial districts of the General District Court serving…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this scenario I have found that the partner was very wrong for attacking the prisoner. Furthermore, he should have never been in the back sit with the prison because he did not give him any reason to be there. Although, the guy is a criminal who was molesting children it is not his job to be the judge and jury. He was risking the chance of this known molester getting off with his crimes because he decided to take the law into his own hands without follow procedures. Therefore, he was wrong and the partner was wrong because he should have stopped the car when he hit the guy the first time and made him get in the front with him.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Probable Cause

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasonable suspicion and probable cause can each play a role in making an automobile stop, however the terms are used interchangeably. The term, probable cause” is used to “support” a traffic stop, whereas the term “reasonable suspicion” is used as a standard that complies with the Fourth Amendment; the right against “unreasonable” searches and seizures. So if officers are within the rights, he may then proceed to stop a vehicle; that is if he has “reasonable suspicion” to believe that a traffic violation or crime has occurred. In an investigatory stop, the stop must be temporary and not last any longer than what is necessary for the purpose of the stop.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment was put into place to protect the rights of the American people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. Constitution specifically states “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…” (U.S. Constitution – Amendment 4). Additional, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that some searches and seizures may be classified as constitutional based on reasonable suspicion and not justified as probable cause. (Lushbaugh, C. A. and Weston, P. B. (2012) Probable cause is a discretionary law that is left up to the officer to determine if he/she has adequate information to entertain probable cause.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deterrence is a way of using punishment to threaten, discourage, or divert people from committing further crimes. There are two key categories of deterrence: general deterrence and specific deterrence. General deterrence targets potential offenders, aiming to discourage individuals from committing similar offences as past offenders. General deterrence can also be thought of as a threat to the whole public, it would occur when an individual sees the consequences of another; therefore, does not engage in the same behavior. Specific deterrence, on the other hand, is a punishment to the individual person because of a crime they committed.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the mission of corrections? The mission of the corrections has traditionally been to implement court-prescribed sentences for criminal violators or to carry out the sentence of the court. 2.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The four Philosophies of Punishment (1) Retribution: It is a hypothesis of equity that considers proportionate punishment an adequate reaction to wrongdoing. This retribution theory essentially fit the ethical gravity of a wrongdoing committed and, to a lesser degree, the qualities of the guilty party. Furthermore, it is utilized as the premise for discipline which includes compulsory sentencing strategies and sentencing rules frameworks. These disciplines are a social articulation of the individual retaliation the criminal 's casualties feels, reasonably kept to what is best for society all in all. This basically suggests "eye for eye" judgments.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Labeling theorists and deterrence theorists both have a particular view with their theories when it comes to criminal punishment. To understand those views it is essential to first understand both the labeling and the deterrence theory. Labeling theory looks into labels that are placed on individuals based off of certain characteristics or attributions that they posses. This can be seen as a form of control to weaken another by giving them a particular label. With this being stated labeling theory can be associated with social control as labeling another individual can be viewed as a social control.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tertiary prevention focuses on the offender after crime has happen, with the main focus being on deterrence and rehabilitation to prevent from re-offending. Tertiary prevention reduces the recidivism rate and insures that appropriate steps are taken so that the victim is not re-victimized. In the United States the primary form of tertiary prevention is incapacitation. Tertiary prevention does not stop criminals from committing crimes after their release but protects the population from victimization of criminals. Specific deterrence is achieved by instilling fear into individuals that are being punished with the prevention of the individual from future violations of the law.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction My argument is that the law of intention is clear, simple, and still fit for purpose. Intention is one of the categories falling under the mens rea of murder. The law uses intention as one of the main methods of classifying offences, such as deciding between murder or manslaughter. The presence or absence of intention is what the law is interested in, not the motive behind the actions in question.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays