Covering Societal views on gender have shifted and turning for generations now. The biggest icons even make impacts of gender identity and gender roles in the United States. The likes of Jaden smith, Young Thug, and Lady GaGa all appear on the media to showcase their taste in clothing and style. Some of these are gender bending and have influenced many people across the nation. Is this really a valid example for the future of our nation exposing them to gender bending media that influences parents into choosing the gender for their babies. This is an act of covering in which a person hides a disfavored trait to fit into the mainstream. The Author Kenji Yoshino expresses his concern of covering and how it’s a breach to our civil
…show more content…
Leading in to Jayme Poisson’s article about how genderless babies are becoming more relevant and how certain parents raise children with no gender. This leaves it to the baby to decide what they want to do about their gender. This raises the question, should covering be something good for society at all? Or is it just another way to suppress the true nature of generational evolution? By covering the gender of an infant and allowing them to choose what gender they would like to belong to, a person would be raising them with ignorance. There is no escaping how the world runs daily. With gender roles intact people are obliged to be conscious of how they raise their children, even if we are covering their gender from them to give them freedom, parents would be condemning them to a life of ridicule. Kenji Yoshino makes a very valid point …show more content…
People should abolish covering because of the fact that it takes away the walls made by society and doesn’t take people with different values seriously. This concept allows people to interact well with each other but that shouldn’t be the case, this should minimize the amount of slander and hate we see going on with woman who enjoy dressing as men, or little toddlers who love playing with dolls despite the sex they were born into the problem with covering should not be made to have the babies lead their lives and the parents should not teach their kids to be as they
Leading in to Jayme Poisson’s article about how genderless babies are becoming more relevant and how certain parents raise children with no gender. This leaves it to the baby to decide what they want to do about their gender. This raises the question, should covering be something good for society at all? Or is it just another way to suppress the true nature of generational evolution? By covering the gender of an infant and allowing them to choose what gender they would like to belong to, a person would be raising them with ignorance. There is no escaping how the world runs daily. With gender roles intact people are obliged to be conscious of how they raise their children, even if we are covering their gender from them to give them freedom, parents would be condemning them to a life of ridicule. Kenji Yoshino makes a very valid point …show more content…
People should abolish covering because of the fact that it takes away the walls made by society and doesn’t take people with different values seriously. This concept allows people to interact well with each other but that shouldn’t be the case, this should minimize the amount of slander and hate we see going on with woman who enjoy dressing as men, or little toddlers who love playing with dolls despite the sex they were born into the problem with covering should not be made to have the babies lead their lives and the parents should not teach their kids to be as they