Explain Why My Government Will Not Have A Senate

Decent Essays
My government will not have a senate body. The senate includes a group of people that are appointed by the Governor-General on the advice of the Prime Minister. There are very few requirements needed to become a senator and they remain in this position until the age of seventy-five years. The reason my government won't have a senate is because it does not give fair opportunities to all the citizens as most are chosen by the PM based on his associations. Additionally, the senators are paid a high salary, but are not very accountable for their tasks because most of them are certain to remain in power till they retire. I feel that the country is better off with people that are well- educated and committed to their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This opinion piece, written by Senator Leo Housakos and published earlier this year in the Montreal Gazette, talked about the Senate’s attempt to improve the connection between this parliamentary institution and the Canadian citizens. As stated in the article, the Senate tried to deepen the connection between citizens and the institution by cultivating a better communication amongst them. According to Senator Housakos, transparency and accessibility go hand in hand with good governance, meaning the main purpose behind the Senate’s actions was their desire to be more open about their committee meetings and about the decisions that were taken. At the same time, Senator Housakos highlighted the Senate’s significance in the Canadian constitution…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this being said, there are changes that need immediate attention. A basic education should be provided in impartial manner to every American regardless of socioeconomics reasons, only then students will have a better quality of life and a tool to get out of poverty conditions. However, this is not accomplishable if this educational system does not change because a better education empowers good results for the individual and for this…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    at the constitution convention, a pre-republic group led by Malcolm turnbull, the current member for Wentworth, Wanted a prominent citizen appointed by parliament as the president. The danger in this is that the power to remove a corrupt government that cannot get taxation bill through the senate for example supply, is obliged to go to the people to either to erected or voted out. If Australians refuse to go to the pole and they run out money then the GG would have to order them in or a president which would be once it is a republic nation. If Australia becomes a republic it will benefit our businesses and the economy.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This government would listen to the people, help maintain natural rights and defeat anything that tried to take away these rights. Government should be put in place only to secure the rights of all man kind and never to pose any threat towards the rights of humans. If any type of government does go against independence and freedom, the people under that threatening government are allowed to abolish it and replace it with a new form of government. A famous line “that all men are created equal” is the start to the reasoning of becoming an independent state with a “for the people”…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Welcome to the Pledis Islands! The Pledis Islands are comprised of two main islands and twelve smaller islands in the Pacific Ocean, specifically at 42 degrees latitude and 162 degrees longitude. These islands where man made in 2012 by architect Sabine Toews, and have the smooth lines of traditional man made islands, as well as many natural features that truly make it unique. These islands generally experience a climate similar to that of the marine west coast, with warm summers, cool winters, and rainfall all year.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government not being regulated and no established checks and balances, could result in the in government being too powerful and leading to the government not being for the people. Also if the government is not established by the composition of a diverse people from many backgrounds and ideas, the government may be comprised by too many of the similar group of individuals with alterative motives and interests. We see this in certain groups in the Middle East and South Africa. Where a certain group of people with religious of social similarities have obtained virtually all the positions in government. This has created a stronghold of the government, and only those who align with their views and ideology receive benefits from the decisions made by them.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the idea of a more representative us senate as stated by Sabato. Sabato proposes, “First, we need a larger, more representative U.S. Senate that better fits the massively increased population of…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catherine Rampell

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This poses an even bigger problem, because the people without as high of education now have an even yet tougher time landing a job. Not only can they not get a job, but they probably…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are many people with power to influence parliament, I heavily considered three members to address my submission too. Firstly, Stephen Parry is the President of the Senate, thus he presides over proceedings and can be hugely influential on senate decisions. However, he does have the same voting power as all other Senate members (Parliament of Australia, 2015). Secondly, Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, recently called for an Australian republic by 2025, further reinforcing the labor government’s intentions for promoting a republic (Ireland, 2015). While this provides hope for the future, there is no certainty that the labor government will come into power within an appropriate time frame.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With no power to levy nor enforce taxes, the federal government were struggling to accumulate a national budget. This particular point really emphasize the defects of central government and presented its inconsistency. The general legislative branch with only thirteen members prove to be an inefficient elements. The limit upon votes, regardless of size, concluded in long delays and simple no results. Problems over having only one branch of government, the legislature, averted to the issue of lacking both a solid leader and national judiciary court.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it takes place everywhere, unemployment rates would increase as an effect of those new professionals seeking for a better job prospect. New presidential candidates’ proposals may become a reality and revolutionize the system again and…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having a representative government is crucial to maintain control over our country and over every state. It can be contradicting when we see the news and how the government is handing every problem, but if we didn't have someone to make laws and control the country everything would be chaotic. There is the thought that this is a free country, and many people try to take advantage of that. Having the employment of rational legislators act as the deputies of us (the people) represent our will in the halls of government is the best thing to do in my opinion. We have check and balances that keep the three branches of government (the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches) from getting too powerful of one another.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays