Difference Between Common Law And Civil Law

Superior Essays
The common law and civil law legal systems have been described as two of the major legal systems of the world. What are the main distinguishing features? Are these differences of any significant importance to the Ghanaian legal system? Your answer should not be more than 1200 words.

With no doubt it is widely known that Common legal system and civil legal system are the two major legal systems in the world. Most of the countries in the world practice either one of them that is not to say that there are no other legal systems. Ghana practices the common law system of government which they adopted through colonialism by England. This essay is centred at the major difference between common and civil legal system. And also looking
…show more content…
To elaborate more, in an adversarial model, responsibility for gathering evidence rests with the parties – police and defense – and an independent evaluation of that evidence by a neutral judge is left to the trial. In an inquisitorial model, criminal investigation, at least in serious cases, is typically overseen by either an “independent” prosecutor or an examining magistrate (in France termed a “juge d’instruction”). The prosecutor or examining magistrate can seek particular evidence; direct lines of inquiry favorable to either prosecution or defense; interview complainants, witnesses and suspects; and ultimately determine whether there is sufficient evidence to take a case to trial . The adversarial system applies in Ghana, were by the judges are neutral and the lawyer appear before the court to present their case and …show more content…
The common law consists of received English common law and the doctrines of equity. Ghana’s common law has acquired a meaning far removed from the English common law received into Ghana after Bond of 1844. The doctrine in common law has not been removed completely from the system but has been shaped to fit the values and culture of the Ghanaian citizens this was seen in the case of Re Abotsi; Kwao v Nortey were the court acknowledged the common law. Just as Ghana will continue to evolve, the common law tradition will fade away and the Ghanaian people’s way of live will become the new precedent of the land.

References
Berkeley. The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from https://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/robbins/pdf/CommonLawCivilLawTraditions.pdf

Dainow (1967): Civil Law and the Common Law, p.424, vol. 15. Retrieved from http://www.fd.unl.pt/docentes_docs/ma/wks_MA_22856.pdf

Common Law and Civil Law: A Brief Comparison. Retrieved from www.legallanguage.com/legal-articles/common-law-and-civil-law-a-brief-comparison/
Law commission: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems: A Brief Overview of Key Features. Retrieved from

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hammurabi's Twelve Tables

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While the law codes are comparative as it were, they additionally share a few contrasts. A typical subject that goes through…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Introduction Focusing on the case of Daniel Garcia, this paper examines the limits of a universal individualist legal framework for the rights of undocumented migrant children in Canada. Daniel Garcia was an eighteen-year old when he was apprehended by police in Toronto and deported from Canada in 2011 (CITE). As the analysis will show, this case exemplifies the problems of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (2001) and sheds lights on how the law breaches children’s rights as defined by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is an exemplary case of how a universal rights framework has serious limitations for undocumented migrants, including children, arguably the most vulnerable undocumented migrants of all.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years throughout history, much debate and controversy has been sparked with respect to Canada’s correctional system and criminal justice system. Canada’s criminal justice system has thrived/strived to work as a consolidated unified entity aimed at reducing, maintaining, and preventing crime and criminal activity. However, great controversy remains as to whether or not Canada’s criminal justice system is effective. It can be argued, for example, that Canada’s system of criminal justice is aimed at striving to achieve and meet specified goals, entities, or principles. In terms of sentencing a criminal offender, for example, sentencing can either be based on the principles of crime control or due process.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial systems of various countries operate in such a manner where the fundamental belief of justice is carried out based on the code of law. Since every country is governed by its own set of laws and rules, due process for such criminal acts will not have the same punishment or consequences like those here in the United States. As such, the country of Australia will be analyzed in order to understand how the judicial system and the application of criminal responsibility work. The Australian legal system is based upon the fundamental belief of the rule of law, justice, and independence of the judiciary (Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2012).…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Law? The foundation of the Anglo-American Law is dated back to the Norman Conquest in 1066. William the Conqueror was the first king in England to establish courts and laws that were common throughout the land. The common laws, originally from England are still in effect today.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts as property is an initially perplexing notion. Published in a 1977 issue of The British Journal of Criminology, “Conflicts as Property” is an article criticising industrialised legal criminal systems and proposing a new, reformed system. Nils Christie suggests that conflicts are entities that are taken from their rightful owners. He later describes a hypothetical legal system where “professional thievery” of conflicts is nonexistent. By use of an analogy and several sub-ideas he deconstructs the concept.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts has the furthest conceptual distance to travel to become community oriented and it may be attributed to the fact that the courts is criminal matters and not problem places. They maintain the traditional values of detachment and impartiality, in which tend to disconnect judges and lawyers from their clients and their communities. The community court has changes how the criminal court work, it address the problems in the community. Over the past few years, courts have been involved with some interesting experimentation with community justice concepts and strategies. Courts have two main responsibilities adjudicate disputes and determine sanctions in cases that have been adjudicated.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Customary law is a system based on the interpretation of a court case, based on prior cases. This approach is called stare decisis (Scalia 4) which is deciding a case based on precedent. The practice of stare decisis is highly criticized by Scalia. Justice Scalia explains that the system of case precedent or common law review, has two main problems. The first one cited by Justice Scalia is that, common law review applied the law to the fact of a case.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whincup, 1992). The Normans introduced the institution of jury and the absence of the written letter of the law. Common law is laws that are known widely but may not be written down just common sense laws. Stare decisis is an important feature that developed from common law. British colonies adopted the common law as the law of the land.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The need for police ethics and accountability is very important in public sector. Accountability refers to an obligation of an individual or organisation to account for its activities, accept responsibility for them and to disclose the results in a transparent manner (Prenzler, 2013, p. 27). The role of police is usually summarised in terms of enforcing the law, preventing crime, maintaining order and providing emergency assistance. They are responsible of protecting people from assault, sexual assault, murder, robbery, theft, extortion, kidnapping, fraud and many other types of threats to their property and wellbeing, as well as assisting at accidents and other emergencies. They also have a duty to assist in minimising people’s fear of crime…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The common law system is a system of laws based on judicial decisions, rather than on statutes or constitutions. The United States adopted the English version of the common law system during the colonial years. The…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays