The Goal Of Criminal Law Vs. Civil Law

Great Essays
The goal of civil law is to resolve disputes between parties (individuals or entities).2 For example, in the preceding illustration, you had a dispute with a fellow student. The civil law system allows you, the injured party, to resolve your dispute in a civilized, orderly fashion. Without this option, you might be tempted to ‘‘take matters into your own hands.’’ The defendant in a civil case does not have to worry about the possibility of incarceration. On the other hand, incarceration and fines represent the goals of criminal law. The court in a civil case may require the defendant to compensate the injured party for damages suffered at the hands of the defendant.
The party who initiates a legal action in a civil suit is either a private citizen or a business entity, such as a corporation or a partnership. Conversely, a public employee (usually a prosecutor) initiates a criminal proceeding on

2The term civil law is also used to describe one of the two established legal systems in the Western world. The two systems are the common law legal system and the civil legal system. The common law system is a system of laws based on judicial decisions, rather than on statutes or constitutions. The United States adopted the English version of the common law system during the colonial years. The
…show more content…
Criminal intent deals with a defendant’s state of mind when committing a crime. Criminal act refers to the specific acts performed by a defendant in carrying out a crime. Criminal intent is often referred to as the mens rea, which is the Latin term for ‘‘guilty mind.’’ For most crimes, the prosecution must prove ‘‘beyond a reasonable doubt’’ that the defendant intended to commit the crime for which the defendant has been charged. In practical terms, a person’s ‘‘intent’’ relates to that person’s state of mind while performing an accompanying

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Definition The common law was originally developed in historical England and is the result of judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom, and precedent (Satterlee, 2014, p. 86). Summary The article “Oregon Occupiers Call for Common Law Grand Jury” written by Steve Almasy and Sara Weisfeldt, CNN states that Ammon Bundy, the man leading a group of armed protesters who have taken over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, called for a common law grand jury to examine what he called violations of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statute Law In Australia

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A verdict is rendered after the case is heard by a Judge. This verdict sets a precedent for all future similar cases; therefore common law is formed on the basis of previous judgments. There are some examples, negligence, torts, fiduciary duties and other equitable rights and contracts that come under common law jurisdiction. Common Law precedents can also result from interpretations of statute law. Common law can become statute law by the power of the day, (Parliament) turning a common law precedent into statutory…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Cases Civil cases are generally brought by private citizens or corporations seeking to collect money owed or collect monetary damages. Some examples of civil case include landlord/tenant disputes, divorce proceedings, child custody proceedings, property disputes, personal injury, etc. Civil cases settle personal or business matters when an individual or group feels wronged by a defendant or can’t come to an agreement on a legal matter.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court’s system began when the Norman conquered England, the establishments of courts was a way of unifying the country. Their intentions were to establish a common, or uniform, set of rules for the whole country. The body of judge-made laws that was developed under the system is still used today, which is known as the common law, applying decisions to similar situations. With newer cases, they relied on precedents in deciding the case. As for the United States, the United Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, sees that precedent are bind on all lower courts.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Definitions 1. Plain view is a legal term that describes the ready visibility of objects that might be seized as evidence during a search by police in the absence of a search warrant specifying the seizure of those objects. To lawfully seize evidence in plain view, officers must have a legal right to be in the viewing area and must have cause to believe that the evidence is somehow associated with criminal activity pg. 205 2. Terry Stop is a brief detention of a person by police on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity but short of probable cause to arrest.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A person’s life has been heinously taken due to no fault of their own. Family and friends of the deceased have mourned, children have lost a parent, parents lost a child, and wives lost a husband. There is no way to ease their pain but, all they want is justice but, will they get it? When the murderer is finally caught the family is elated with joy and anticipate justice will prevail. But, there’s a catch, as the suspect’s defense attorney is claiming he was insane at the time the crime was committed and intends to plead just that.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whincup, 1992). The Normans introduced the institution of jury and the absence of the written letter of the law. Common law is laws that are known widely but may not be written down just common sense laws. Stare decisis is an important feature that developed from common law. British colonies adopted the common law as the law of the land.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are not really many similarities and differences between a criminal and civil case. First of all the difference between the two cases in general would be that in a criminal case, the government brings suit against a person who they believe has broken the law. The judge or a jury must consider the evidence presented during a trial to decide whether the accused is guilty or innocent. A crime can occur even if there is no instant victim. In a civil case a person or company asks a judge to settle their problems.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction My argument is that the law of intention is clear, simple, and still fit for purpose. Intention is one of the categories falling under the mens rea of murder. The law uses intention as one of the main methods of classifying offences, such as deciding between murder or manslaughter. The presence or absence of intention is what the law is interested in, not the motive behind the actions in question.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics