Compare And Contrast Alien And Sedition Acts

Improved Essays
A few months ago, the final part of the Alien and Sedition Acts was passed by the Federalist Congress and signed into law by President John Adams. Rumor is that the acts were made to prepare for a battle with France, our current enemy as of their hostility at sea. The Acts are a grave mistake by the Federalists, for they could lead to the downfall of our country.
The Alien and Sedition Acts consists of four sinful laws. The first law is the Naturalization Act, which demands a minimum residency of fourteen years. There is only one word to describe this-Outrageous! How is a person supposed to wait for fourteen years before being allowed to become a citizen. The act additionally prevents any people from ‘enemy’ nations to apply for naturalization. Not everyone in the ‘enemy’ country is harmful, and they even help the economy by taking more jobs. The law that follows is The Alien Enemies Act. It states that once war has been declared, all male citizens of a foreign nation could be arrested or deported. Afterwards, the Alien Friends Act was passed, being the third law. This law authorizes the president to deport any non-citizen suspected of plotting against the government during either wartime or peacetime. The last
…show more content…
They violate the First Amendment in the constitution: the freedom of speech. Moreover, it also violates the Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Obviously, the alien and sedition act violates the constitution making them illegitimate. Passing the Alien and Sedition Acts was not the brightest decision made by the government. It is unconstitutional, breaking even more than one amendment. Furthermore, the Federal government misuses the acts to abuse the power they have control over. Therefore, all bills of the Alien and Sedition Acts should be revoked from the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Espionage Act DBQ

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The government says we can’t get our natural or unalienable rights taken away. They have basically lied to us the WHOLE ENTIRE TIME. In Document A talks about the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act was past in 1917 when people were calling our government bad because the government had no power and the people of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA had the freedom of speech. The Sedition Act was past in 1918 when the Espionage Act wasn’t working out , so they had to make another law that was more strict.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalists would have countered the authors view by stating that the Act was for the betterment of the country. The Alien and Sedition acts helped protect the country from French nationalists by allowing the President to deport anyone that was dangerous. It also helped keep journalists from creating lies that would hurt the country by creating instability. The Whiskey Rebellion erupted the tensions between the two parties.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At a time when the nation was struggling to repay itʻs war debts as well as re-establishing itʻs trade market, the restrictions the Articles placed on itʻs governing body, impacted 3 vital areas of the economy: trade, currency, and taxes. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Continental Congress had no ability to regulate trade, except with Native Americans, as long as they did not impinge upon a stateʻs interests. Although Congress could negotiate treaties with foreign countries, which the states could not do, they could in no way influence trade deals, foreign or domestic. This led to each state having their own system of trade policies. (Brackemyre, n.d.)…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On February 8, 1887, Congress passed the Dawes Act as a solution to the "Indian Problem." Congress viewed this conflict similar to Americans Richard H. Pratt and Carl Schurz. They had noticed the Westward Expansion campaign had become an "invasion," particularly for Native Americans. Both men believed the Natives could be saved be integrating them into western society, to "individualize them in the possession and appreciation of property," as Mr. Schurz claimed. Mr. Pratt had seen the harsh conditions of Native reservations himself, which lead him to conclude they were in desperate need of civilized education.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The four laws lengthened the residency requirement for citizenship, limited the number of new voters, allowed for the president to deport or detain non-citizens insofar as they threatened national security, and banned subversive communication. ”(Macy, pp.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alien Acts Dbq Analysis

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Adams stated, "The speech of the President [ of the French Directory]...evinces a disposition to separate the people of the United States from the government...whom they themselves have chosen to manage their common concerns” (Document J). People like Adams who didn’t trust immigrants prompted the passing of the Alien act that required a fourteen year residency period for aliens prior to naturalization as a citizen, allowed the restraint and removal in time of war of resident adult aliens of the hostile nations, and gave the President power to deport the aliens he thought could be a threat to America. The Democratic-Republicans thought passing the acts was an attempt to strengthen the federal government overthrow the power of the states. A republican congressmen from New York, Edward Livingston, said in a speech to the House of Representatives in June of 1798: "...by this act [i.e., the Alien Act]... the president alone is empowered to make the law, to fix in his mind what acts, words, what thoughts or looks, shall constitute the crime contemplated by the bill, that is the crime of being ‘suspected to be dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States….’ ” (Document Q).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For the primary sources federalist No.51 and federalist No.10, there's differences and similarities. They also include information that evaluates each other. To know what it is, that is included in the the primary sources it has to be explained. To begin with, the similarities of the primary sources federalist papers No.51 and 10 is that they both were written from the same person, which was James Madison. In the federalist paper No.51 it states that, “it was published under the pen name publius” and so was federalist No.10.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Alien and Sedition Acts are four laws enacted by the Federalist-controlled U.S. Congress, allegedly in response to the hostile actions of the French Revolutionary government on the seas and in the councils of diplomacy, but actually designed to destroy Thomas Jefferson's Republican party, which had openly expressed its sympathies for the French Revolutionaries (Alien and Sedition Acts). I personally think John made a good move signing this. By signing the this, he gave the power to himself to incarcerate or deport immigrants that were thought to have been involved in activities posing a threat to our national government. I also agree with the signing of this because the Sedition Act ceased all Republican opinions of the federalists. This nullified the First Amendment freedoms of speech and the press.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    President John Adams has just passed a new act, the alien and sedition act. The Alien act makes it much harder for anyone it become a citizen. To become a legal citizen you have to have lived here for fifteen full years instead of five years like it has been in the past. This act also gives our president the power to kick any illegal alien out of the country, in simple terms making immigration illegal. The Sedition part of the act means this, that we have lost our freedom of speech.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result, Madison and Jefferson directed their opposition to the new laws to state legislatures” (U.S. History “The Alien and Sedition Acts”). The Sedition Act created the most controversy because it was unconstitutional, but the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts at the time can be viewed as…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas Bill of Rights is significantly more specific than the American Bill of Rights. It is less vague and allows less room for interruption. It gives defined examples and conditions for each section. Look at Article 1 Section 11a, it explicitly defines what constitutes a violent offense and what constitutes a sexual offense. The Texas Bill of Rights also expands on certain things mentioned in the American Bill of Rights.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, known as IRCA, is related to racialized sentiments. According to Golash-Boza, the discussions of implementing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 raised racialized sentiments about Mexicans. Mexicans were thought to be a threat as they were seen as “taking jobs from Americans, overusing welfare, and refusing to assimilate” although that was opposite of what was actually happening (Golash-Boza 374). The time when Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was being discussed was the time when the economy was bad and so blame went to Latin Americans, whom at the time were moving to the United States in a great number while “[generating] waves of nativism and anti-immigrant sentiment”…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I. Incitement of imminent violence The first issue is what constitutional argument could be made against Tax’s conviction under the Sedition Statute. Under the US constitution First Amendment, laws that limit freedom of speech are unconstitutional. However, certain types of unprotected speeches that advocate violence, fighting words, hostile audience speech, obscene speech and defamatory speeches can be regulated.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and Contrast United States Constitution and Iroquois Constitution The Iroquois Constitution and the United States Constitution are very different yet very similar. They relate to each other on many different levels. They both serve as foundations for constitutions all over the world. Other constitutions that have been made presently look back on these two constitutions and kind of use them as a guideline.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays