Compare And Contrast Federalist No. 51 And 10

Decent Essays
For the primary sources federalist No.51 and federalist No.10, there's differences and similarities. They also include information that evaluates each other. To know what it is, that is included in the the primary sources it has to be explained. To begin with, the similarities of the primary sources federalist papers No.51 and 10 is that they both were written from the same person, which was James Madison. In the federalist paper No.51 it states that, “it was published under the pen name publius” and so was federalist No.10. Federalist No. 51 and 10 were also published in the same state, New York. In federalist paper No.51 it also states that “it was urge of New York to support the approval of the proposed U.S. Constitution”. In federalist paper No.10 it states, “they were written to urge of New York to support the ratification of the proposed United States Constitution”. So both were written in order for the New York citizens to support the ratification. Both were also explained in detail. …show more content…
In the past it had been really hard and needed to break it down. It actually helped them and the whole thing turned into the United States Constitution. The members were also responsible for writing the constitution. In present time, the members of the constitutional convention, helped the people who are going to use the federalist papers, will help them understand the intentions of the writers of the constitution. In conclusion, federalist paper No.51 has some same information than federalist paper No.10 doesn't . It has helped other people who works in the constitutional convention today, know the intentions of writing the constitution. The essays explains the sections of the constitution in detail. To sum it up, the federalist No.10 and No.51 were all for the New York

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How did the constitution guard against tyranny, in the government, and in the states? The 55 delegates who attended the Constitutional Convention were a distinguished body of men who represented a cross section of 18th-century American leadership. Almost all of them were well-educated men of means who were dominant in their communities and states, and many were also prominent in national affairs, met to write the new constitution, that would change the way that we lived forever. Led by the chief executive, the delegates all got together to write the new constitution, the articles of confederation were not keeping peace in the states or the government as well. The delegates wanted to guard against tyranny, as well as build a new frame for our government, and states.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first man to ease the fears and concerns of the people was James Madison. He promised that a Bill of Rights would be added to the Constitution as individual amendments if they would, in turn, be ratified. The greatest dissension and opposition towards the Constitution was in New York. In order to counteract the anti-federalists present in New York, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote a conglomeration of essays called “The Federalist Papers”. These essays discussed the positive reforms that the Constitution would make, and how they would better the states as a whole.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The contrasts between these two documents are, all in all, more critical than the similarities. That is the reason the general population who composed the Constitution felt that it was so imperative to have another constitution instead of basically altering the old one. Be that as it may, there were a couple of similarities. The most imperative similarity was that the nation set up by every document was to be a vote based nation.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance of the Constitution The United States Constitution: A Graphic Adaptation written by Jonathan Hennessey and illustrated by Aaron McConnell describes the events and documents leading up to the Constitution of the United States. There was tension between many countries about the land on the continent of America. The English colonies wanted freedom to own the land without authority of the British king, but the king did not agree (Hennessey 8). After many fights, riots, uprisings, and disagreements, the colonies’ elite men came together as the Continental Congress, and Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence to declare freedom from Britain’s tyranny and misrepresentation (Hennessey 13).…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, Jefferson and Madison wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which spoke out against the Federalist Government. In these resolutions the duo claimed that the federal government had too much power, and that it (the power) must be returned to the states. In a similar letter to a future member of Jefferson’s cabinet, Jefferson wrote that according to the principles on which the Constitution was received, the states’ rights should be preserved (Doc A). The purpose of this letter was to persuade the audience, who was the future cabinet member, to support strict constructionist of the constitution, and to advocate for states’…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalist felt greatly upset by the Federalist ratification of the Constitution, which had shifted state power into federal hands, while the Federalists wished to keep a Bill of Rights out of the Constitution, because they believed that they could not list each right, and that the rights unstated would be broken and abused. The Federalists eventually won the ratification of the Constitution in large part because they set up the ratification process in a way that would be favorable to them. They had new conventions which were held in states that were favorable to their position first, and they required only 9 of the 13 states to ratify, although the Articles of Confederation had clearly stated that all 13 states would be required in order to agree to any amendments to the…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is federalism? Federalism “is a unique relationship between all levels of government that gives each some degree of independence from each other but definitely binds them together through the United States Constitution.” (pg. 69) 2.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays