In the book of Back to the Lake, there are two articles that share the same topic of education. However, both articles were written differently and have a different purpose. One of the articles titles is called “Higher Education: Not What It Used to be” is an article that discusses the problems of how universities are highly expensive for students to go to. Meanwhile, the second article, “How to Pull an All-Nighter” is a process article that discuss how to study better during the night. Both articles are too have different methods to explain their topic, but both do share a common interest. “Higher Education: Not What It Used to be”, is an article written for The Economist which is a British magazine. In the article it explains the how
…show more content…
The book it self presents situations that can be solve from there book. The authors from the book stated, “"How to Pull an All-Nighter" is from that collection and deals with a process that some might actually engage in-staying up all night to study" (Piven, Borgenicht, & Worick 307). The article is written in a process and informational article for students that what to pull a long night of studying, which is different from “Higher Education: Not What It Used to Be” because its audience is for those who want to know more about the college expenses problems. The article is written in small paragraphs highlighting different steps, it also gives one illustrate picture. For example, The article is written as a process, it mentions that we should not skip a meal and select foods with proteins that provide you with energy and stamina for a long night (307). The tone that the article gives is a relax and informational tone to the readers. Both articles have there own characteristics that define their ways of writing, but both share common topics and writing …show more content…
“How to Pull an All-Nighter” is a process article to explain how to do a night study using a relax tone and diction to get there point across. “Higher Education: Not What It Used to be”, gets their point across with a strong use of diction and providable facts that support their answers. These articles are examples of literature that can be differently written for a different purpose. However, both use common ideas and rhetorical devices to get there point across in different
The book it self presents situations that can be solve from there book. The authors from the book stated, “"How to Pull an All-Nighter" is from that collection and deals with a process that some might actually engage in-staying up all night to study" (Piven, Borgenicht, & Worick 307). The article is written in a process and informational article for students that what to pull a long night of studying, which is different from “Higher Education: Not What It Used to Be” because its audience is for those who want to know more about the college expenses problems. The article is written in small paragraphs highlighting different steps, it also gives one illustrate picture. For example, The article is written as a process, it mentions that we should not skip a meal and select foods with proteins that provide you with energy and stamina for a long night (307). The tone that the article gives is a relax and informational tone to the readers. Both articles have there own characteristics that define their ways of writing, but both share common topics and writing …show more content…
“How to Pull an All-Nighter” is a process article to explain how to do a night study using a relax tone and diction to get there point across. “Higher Education: Not What It Used to be”, gets their point across with a strong use of diction and providable facts that support their answers. These articles are examples of literature that can be differently written for a different purpose. However, both use common ideas and rhetorical devices to get there point across in different