44. The applicant’s case also relied solely on hearsay, Magistrate’s Courts (hearsay evidence in civil proceeding) rules 1999.
45. These are the conditions The Appellant was placed under and are for the whole of the UK:
46. The defendant is prohibited from:
A. Attending a rave as defined by s.63 (1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
B. Being concerned in the organisation of a rave as defined by s.63(1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
C. Knowingly using or supplying property, personal or otherwise, for use in a rave as defined by s.63(1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
D. Entering or remaining in any disused or abandoned building unless invited to do so in writing by a registered …show more content…
Points to address regarding the conditions the Appellant is prohibited from doing.
50. Clearly, the conditions the Appellant was put under are a breach of the Appellant’s human rights, and disproportionate due to the fact it would breach:
A. Article 3 freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment:-
B. Article 5 right to liberty and security:-
C. Article 8 respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence:-
D. Article 23.1 of the universal declaration of human rights states: (1) everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. 51. Condition E states entering or remaining on a non-residential private property on an industrial estate between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am without the written permission from the owner of that land and/or leaseholder of the property.
52. With this condition in place, it makes it so that the Appellants life is left in term while as for it leaves him in a state of confusion as to what he can and can not do as he has been left not equal to others.
53. Any non-residential property the Appellant would like to attend such as where house night club or any friends or families private parties he is not able to …show more content…
These are just two more of the concerns within the conditions that the Appellant is under.
60. Some of our other concerns within the conditions set by the Courts are that the Appellant’s Human rights are even further breached, this includes:-
A. Article 6 right to a fair trial:-
61. The Appellant had to go ahead at the hearing without the barrister having any other paperwork other than the application to strike out, which was not allowed.
62. Also on this date, the police officers did not attend when they knew they should.
63. The Appellant was so unwell at this hearing, he was not coping he should never have had to discharge himself from hospital to try to defend himself.
64. The police have it on the police systems who done what they say the Appellant has done and have not disclosed that information when requested.
65. The following directions were made:
66. The parties to exchange any additional evidence on which they seek to rely by 20th January 2015, this is to include any witness statements from any witness, including the defendant himself; and:-
67. The parties are prohibited from relying on any evidence not already served or served in accordance with paragraph 1 of these directions, without the permission of the
45. These are the conditions The Appellant was placed under and are for the whole of the UK:
46. The defendant is prohibited from:
A. Attending a rave as defined by s.63 (1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
B. Being concerned in the organisation of a rave as defined by s.63(1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
C. Knowingly using or supplying property, personal or otherwise, for use in a rave as defined by s.63(1) of the criminal justice and public order act 1994;
D. Entering or remaining in any disused or abandoned building unless invited to do so in writing by a registered …show more content…
Points to address regarding the conditions the Appellant is prohibited from doing.
50. Clearly, the conditions the Appellant was put under are a breach of the Appellant’s human rights, and disproportionate due to the fact it would breach:
A. Article 3 freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment:-
B. Article 5 right to liberty and security:-
C. Article 8 respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence:-
D. Article 23.1 of the universal declaration of human rights states: (1) everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. 51. Condition E states entering or remaining on a non-residential private property on an industrial estate between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am without the written permission from the owner of that land and/or leaseholder of the property.
52. With this condition in place, it makes it so that the Appellants life is left in term while as for it leaves him in a state of confusion as to what he can and can not do as he has been left not equal to others.
53. Any non-residential property the Appellant would like to attend such as where house night club or any friends or families private parties he is not able to …show more content…
These are just two more of the concerns within the conditions that the Appellant is under.
60. Some of our other concerns within the conditions set by the Courts are that the Appellant’s Human rights are even further breached, this includes:-
A. Article 6 right to a fair trial:-
61. The Appellant had to go ahead at the hearing without the barrister having any other paperwork other than the application to strike out, which was not allowed.
62. Also on this date, the police officers did not attend when they knew they should.
63. The Appellant was so unwell at this hearing, he was not coping he should never have had to discharge himself from hospital to try to defend himself.
64. The police have it on the police systems who done what they say the Appellant has done and have not disclosed that information when requested.
65. The following directions were made:
66. The parties to exchange any additional evidence on which they seek to rely by 20th January 2015, this is to include any witness statements from any witness, including the defendant himself; and:-
67. The parties are prohibited from relying on any evidence not already served or served in accordance with paragraph 1 of these directions, without the permission of the